Michigan House Bill HB4950

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/7/23
• Refer: 9/7/23
• Report Pass: 9/20/23

Caption

Health: abortion; public health code; amend to reflect repealed abortion laws. Amends secs. 2690, 2803, 2848, 2854, 9141, 10102, 16221, 16226, 16245, 16299 & 20115 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.2690 et seq.) & repeals secs. 2835, 2836, 2837, 17014, 17015,17015a, 17016, 17017, 17515, 17516, 17517 & 22224 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.2835 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4949'23

Impact

The bill could have significant implications for state law as it modifies the framework under which abortion-related services are administered. By creating a grant program, HB 4950 aims to ensure that facilities providing reproductive health services can meet specific requirements for ultrasound availability, potentially expanding access for those in need. This change is seen as a way to help entities comply with legislative mandates while encouraging adherence to existing public health standards. Furthermore, the requirement for a cash match introduces a degree of fiscal responsibility in distributing state funds, aiming to foster sustainable financial practices among recipients.

Summary

House Bill 4950 seeks to amend the public health code to align with recent changes regarding abortion laws. The main provisions of the bill involve the adjustment of existing sections and the repealing of certain obsolete sections related to abortion regulations. Specifically, it addresses the funding and regulation surrounding ultrasound equipment for healthcare facilities, which provide reproductive health services. The bill establishes a grant program aimed at assisting qualified entities in acquiring ultrasound equipment, with a clear focus on making these services accessible, particularly for low-income women.

Contention

Despite its supportive goals, the bill may face contention from various advocacy groups and political factions. Opponents may view the funding mechanisms as an indirect method of regulating abortion services, reflecting broader debates over reproductive rights and healthcare access. Concerns around the stipulations for using ultrasound equipment, such as requiring that it not be used in elective abortions, could also spark discussions on both ethical and healthcare delivery fronts. The balance between state oversight and individual rights remains a critical point of contention within the discourse surrounding HB 4950.