Michigan House Bill HB5159

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/17/23
• Refer: 10/17/23

Caption

Mobile homes: other; mobile home commission act; revise. Amends secs. 17, 18, 25, 28, 28a & 29 of 1987 PA 96 (MCL 125.2317 et seq.) & adds sec. 28d. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5157'23, HB 5160'23, HB 5158'23, HB 5161'23

Impact

The implications of HB 5159 could be considerable for both mobile home park operators and residents. For tenants, the bill seeks to establish clearer rights and protections, limiting the grounds on which rent can be increased or fees can be imposed. It explicitly prohibits certain unfair practices, such as charging unmeasured utility service fees and levying penalties not related to occupancy costs. In contrast, mobile home park owners may face challenges adhering to the enhanced standards and regulations that require transparency in rental conditions and potential costs associated with compliance, such as conducting inspections and adhering to new fee structures.

Summary

House Bill 5159 proposes significant amendments to the Mobile Home Commission Act, aiming to enhance tenant rights and regulate practices within mobile home parks in Michigan. The bill focuses on revising several sections related to the operational standards of mobile home parks, particularly emphasizing the fairness of rental agreements and protective measures for residents. A notable amendment includes the requirement for owners to offer written lease agreements for no less than one year, ensuring that tenants have clear rental terms, and must provide notification regarding the expiration of leases at least 30 days in advance.

Contention

The bill also introduces a framework for inspections conducted either by the state or local governments, which may lead to contentious discussions about oversight levels and property management autonomy. While proponents argue that thorough inspections can enhance living conditions and tenant safety, opponents may raise concerns about the additional regulatory burden on mobile home park owners. Another point of contention stems from specified tenant protections that some may argue could hinder the operational flexibility of mobile home parks, potentially affecting their financial viability and attractiveness to investors.