Michigan House Bill HB5165

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/17/23
• Introduced: 12/20/24
• Refer: 10/17/23
• Report Pass: 2/29/24
• Engrossed: 11/13/24
• Refer: 11/26/24
• Report Pass: 12/20/24
• Enrolled: 12/23/24

Caption

State management: other; denial of certain state economic development incentives for businesses listed on the registry; provide for. Amends 1984 PA 270 (MCL 125.2001 - 125.2094) by adding sec. 15.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5165 would significantly alter existing water quality laws by implementing stricter standards for permissible pollutant levels. This could lead to increased compliance costs for industries and municipalities that discharge waste into water bodies. However, supporters believe that such measures are necessary for the long-term health of ecosystems and that the investment in better water quality management would benefit communities through improved public health outcomes and environmental sustainability.

Summary

House Bill 5165 aims to enhance water quality regulations in the state, focusing on stricter controls over pollutants discharged into water bodies. The bill seeks to provide a more robust framework for monitoring and managing water quality, with an emphasis on protecting public health and the environment. Proponents argue that the legislation is critical for safeguarding water sources against contamination and ensuring safe drinking water for communities across the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 5165 is predominantly positive among environmental advocates and public health officials who view the bill as a necessary step toward improving water safety. However, there is notable concern from some business groups and industry representatives about the potential economic implications of the new regulations. This divide illustrates a broader tension between environmental protection efforts and economic considerations, making the discussions about the bill particularly charged.

Contention

A significant point of contention regarding HB 5165 lies in the debate over the balance between regulatory oversight and economic impact. Critics of the bill express worries that heightened regulation could stifle growth in certain sectors, particularly those heavily reliant on water resources. They argue that while protecting water quality is essential, the regulations must be carefully crafted to avoid unnecessary burdens on businesses. This ongoing discussion highlights the challenge of integrating robust environmental protections with economic viability.