Michigan House Bill HB5185

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/19/23
• Refer: 10/19/23

Caption

Health occupations: social workers; social work licensure requirements; modify, and include licensure for licensed clinical social workers. Amends secs. 16177, 16348, 18101 & 18501 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16177 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5184'23

Impact

The bill will create a more structured pathway for social workers seeking licensure as clinical practitioners. By establishing clearer definitions and supervision requirements, it is expected to improve the quality of care delivered by social workers, particularly in clinical settings. This could be particularly impactful in improving accessibility to mental health services in Michigan, as community and individual needs are increasingly recognized as essential to public health outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 5185 aims to amend the Public Health Code of Michigan concerning the licensure requirements for social workers, particularly introducing changes for licensed clinical social workers. This bill seeks to clarify the definition of social work practice at various levels, including the bachelor's, master's, and clinical levels, and sets forth specific guidelines for the training and supervision necessary for licensure. Such amendments are intended to enhance the standards for practice within the state, ensuring that social workers are adequately prepared to address the mental health needs of individuals and communities in Michigan.

Contention

Controversy around HB 5185 includes debates on the sufficiency of the training and supervision mandated for licensure, with some stakeholders expressing concerns that the requirements may not adequately prepare social workers for the complexities of mental health practice. Additionally, there are discussions regarding the costs associated with obtaining licensure, which may present barriers for some prospective social workers. Balancing the need for high standards in practice with accessibility to the profession remains a critical point of contention among legislators and advocacy groups.