Michigan House Bill HB5437

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/14/24

Caption

Taxation: hotel-motel; stadium and convention facility tax; clarify application to short-term rentals and make other modifications. Amends title & secs. 1, 2 & 6 of 1991 PA 180 (MCL 207.751 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5438'24

Impact

The revenues collected from this excise tax will be directed into a special fund, and the funds can be used specifically for the costs associated with stadium and convention facility development, as well as related improvements. The eligible municipalities can utilize these revenues to fund the acquisition and construction of facilities, cover the expenses for elections related to the tax, and to support other necessary programs. The bill specifies that municipalities cannot impose the tax on businesses already taxed by another municipality, aiming to maintain a fair system among local governments.

Summary

House Bill 5437 aims to amend the Public Act 180 of 1991 to provide eligible municipalities in Michigan the authority to impose an excise tax on specific businesses operating within their jurisdictions. This excise tax would apply to businesses engaged in the preparation and delivery of food and beverages, renting motor vehicles, and providing accommodations for transient guests, including those managing short-term rentals. The bill outlines the procedures for the collection, administration, and enforcement of this tax while mandating that the tax must receive voter approval through a single ballot question.

Contention

While HB5437 establishes a framework that could enhance local revenue generation for significant projects, it may also face opposition from local businesses that could be burdened by the additional tax. Those against the bill may express concerns regarding the financial implications for restaurant and hospitality sectors, particularly in areas where competition is intense. Additionally, utilizing taxpayer funds for such developments raises debated questions about priorities and the economic impact on residents and local businesses, echoing larger disputes over public investment in sports and entertainment infrastructure.