Michigan House Bill HB5466

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/22/24
• Refer: 2/22/24

Caption

Crimes: other; legal resident status; require to be present in this state. Amends 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.1 - 750.568) by adding sec. 410d.

Impact

The enactment of HB5466 is poised to have considerable implications for state laws regarding immigration and public safety. By establishing penalties for being unlawfully present, the bill aligns Michigan's laws with stricter immigration enforcement policies. Proponents argue that such measures are necessary to uphold the rule of law and deter illegal immigration. However, they may also heighten tensions surrounding immigrant communities and contribute to increased scrutiny and potential criminalization of individuals based on their immigration status.

Summary

House Bill 5466 introduces significant amendments to the Michigan penal code, specifically by adding section 410d. This new section criminalizes the presence of individuals who are not 'lawfully present' in the United States. It defines lawful presence as being either a citizen of the U.S. or possessing appropriate documentation that allows legal travel within U.S. borders. Violating this provision is categorized as a felony, carrying a potential sentence of up to five years in prison, a maximum fine of $50,000, or both.

Conclusion

Ultimately, HB5466 initiates a complex conversation around state enforcement of immigration laws. The bill's supporters frame it as a necessary measure for public safety and legal integrity, while opponents warn of the societal costs associated with increased criminalization of individuals based on their residency status.

Contention

Notably, the bill presents points of contention among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Critics express concern that criminalizing unlawful presence could exacerbate fear within immigrant communities, leading to reduced cooperation with law enforcement and other governmental entities. Advocacy organizations argue that the bill perpetuates negative stereotypes about immigrants and undermines community trust. Supporters, particularly those emphasizing law and order, assert that it is a crucial step towards immigration accountability.