Michigan House Bill HB5484

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/22/24
• Refer: 2/22/24

Caption

Law enforcement: other; human trafficking health advisory board act; amend to reflect amendments to the public health code. Amends sec. 3 of 2014 PA 461 (MCL 752.993). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5477'24

Impact

This bill signifies a proactive step towards improving the state's capabilities in handling human trafficking cases. By creating an advisory board with a diverse set of expertise, the bill seeks to bring specialized insights into the prevention, intervention, and recovery processes related to human trafficking. The regulatory framework outlined in the amendments also requires public meetings and adherence to the Open Meetings Act, promoting transparency within the board’s operations. Moreover, it establishes clear protocols for the appointment and removal of board members, thereby ensuring accountability in the administration of board functions.

Summary

House Bill 5484 aims to amend existing legislation known as the Human Trafficking Health Advisory Board Act, originally enacted in 2014. The bill specifically targets the structural framework of the health advisory board, making provisions for its membership and operational procedures. It establishes the advisory board as an autonomous entity within the Department of Community Health and Human Services, comprising various appointed members, including licensed medical professionals, mental health experts, and human trafficking survivors. The purpose of this board is to enhance the state’s response and direction in addressing human trafficking, focusing on both prevention and support services for survivors.

Contention

While the bill has been generally well-received for its intent to combat human trafficking, some concerns could arise regarding the representation of survivor voices and the balance of professional expertise on the board. The stipulation that members must be licensed professionals may marginalize individuals who have lived experience without formal qualifications. There is also the possibility that challenges could emerge around the autonomy of the board, particularly in how it might align with existing social service frameworks and funding allocations for human trafficking programs, thus influencing its effectiveness in the long run.