Michigan House Bill HB5559

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/24
• Refer: 3/12/24

Caption

Natural resources: hunting; certain hunting and fishing licenses for law enforcement officers; provide for. Amends 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.101 - 324.90106) by adding sec. 43536b. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5558'24, HB 5560'24

Note

The enactment of HB5559 is contingent upon the approval of other linked legislation, specifically House Bill 5558 and House Bill 5560. This tie-bar provision underscores the interconnected nature of this legislation, indicating that its implementation is part of broader legislative efforts to address related matters within the realm of natural resources and environmental protection.

Impact

By allowing law enforcement officials to obtain hunting and fishing licenses at no cost, HB5559 could potentially enhance their engagement with outdoor activities within Michigan. This may be seen as a recognition of the officers' service, providing them with easier access to recreational opportunities that are often regulated under state laws. However, it also raises questions about the equitable treatment of civilians compared to law enforcement officers, particularly related to access and costs associated with hunting and fishing licenses.

Summary

House Bill 5559 aims to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act of 1994 by adding section 43536b, which provides specific benefits for law enforcement officers in Michigan. The bill stipulates that law enforcement officers may obtain certain hunting and fishing licenses, for which a lottery is not required, at no cost. To avail of this benefit, officers need to present evidence such as their employee identification to a licensing agent. The licenses obtained under this provision will remain valid for the duration of the applicable hunting or fishing season.

Contention

There are several points of contention surrounding HB5559. Critics may argue that providing free licenses solely to law enforcement officers could create a perception of privilege, raising concerns among the general public about equal access to hunting and fishing opportunities. Additionally, opponents might question the implications of this bill on the natural resources available for recreational use and whether the state legislature is prioritizing the needs of law enforcement over its constituents.