Michigan Senate Bill SB0171

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/9/23
• Refer: 3/9/23
• Report Pass: 9/26/23
• Refer: 9/26/23

Caption

Labor: other; local government labor regulatory limitation act; repeal. Repeals 2015 PA 105 (MCL 123.1381 - 123.1396).

Impact

The repeal of the Local Government Labor Regulatory Limitation Act is anticipated to significantly impact state laws regarding labor regulations. Supporters of SB0171 argue that local governments should have the autonomy to address labor issues that directly affect their communities. This change could lead to increased diversity in labor regulations across different localities, potentially allowing for enhanced worker protections and benefits tailored to local needs.

Voting

SB0171 has been reported favorably without amendment during a committee vote held on September 26, 2023, with 3 votes in favor and 1 against. This initial step suggests that there is some legislative support for re-establishing local control over labor regulations, although further discussions and debates can be expected as the bill advances through the legislative process.

Summary

Senate Bill 171 (SB0171) aims to repeal the Local Government Labor Regulatory Limitation Act enacted in 2015. This law previously restricted local governments in Michigan from imposing certain labor regulations, effectively centralizing authority over labor laws in favor of state-level governance. By repealing this legislation, SB0171 seeks to restore the ability of local jurisdictions to establish their own labor regulations, which some believe would better represent the needs and circumstances of local communities.

Contention

There is some contention surrounding this bill, particularly regarding the balance of power between state and local governments. Advocates of the repeal argue that local governments understand their workforce better and can create regulations that reflect the unique economic and social landscapes of their areas. In contrast, opponents of the repeal may express concerns about the potential for disparities in labor protections and businesses' responses to varied local regulations.