Michigan Senate Bill SB0288

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/23
• Refer: 4/25/23
• Report Pass: 5/24/23
• Refer: 5/24/23
• Engrossed: 5/24/23
• Report Pass: 6/21/23
• Enrolled: 6/27/23
• Chaptered: 8/22/23
• Passed: 8/22/23

Caption

Human services: services or financial assistance; Michigan energy assistance program sunset; repeal. Repeals sec. 6 of 2012 PA 615 (MCL 400.1236).

Impact

The repeal of Section 6 means that the specific mechanisms or guidelines that were established for the Michigan Energy Assistance Program are being removed. This adjustment could significantly alter the landscape of energy assistance in Michigan, particularly for low-income families who rely on these provisions. Without these provisions, the available assistance might be less structured, impacting the breadth and consistency of financial support offered to vulnerable populations during energy crises.

Summary

Senate Bill 288, enacted as Public Act No. 105, involves the repeal of Section 6 of the Michigan Energy Assistance Act (2012 PA 615). This section previously delineated provisions for energy assistance targeted specifically at low-income households and prescribed certain powers and duties for state departments responsible for administering those programs. The bill's immediate effect indicates its critical importance to state energy assistance frameworks, modifying how the state will distribute energy support to eligible households in need.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 288 seems mixed based on the voting outcome, where 87 members voted in favor and 22 against it during the house's third reading. Proponents likely view the repeal as a way to streamline state programs or adjust fiscal strategies in the face of changing energy needs, while opponents might express concerns about potential gaps in support for low-income households. The overall legislative sentiment suggests a prioritization of immediate action versus comprehensive policy reassessment.

Contention

A notable point of contention stems from the concerns regarding the potential implications for low-income households dependent on energy assistance. The repeal could lead to a scenario where those previously eligible for structured support find themselves without adequate aid, raising worries about accessibility and the adequacy of alternative support mechanisms once Section 6 is no longer in effect. The debate hinges on whether the repeal addresses necessary adjustments in public policy or unwittingly precipitates hardship for at-risk communities.