Michigan Senate Bill SB0471

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/7/23
• Refer: 9/7/23
• Report Pass: 10/3/23
• Refer: 10/3/23
• Report Pass: 10/11/23
• Engrossed: 10/11/23
• Refer: 10/11/23
• Report Pass: 10/17/23
• Enrolled: 11/2/23
• Chaptered: 12/29/23
• Passed: 12/29/23

Caption

Crimes: weapons; possession of firearms and ammunition by persons convicted of misdemeanor involving domestic violence; prohibit. Amends sec. 224f of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224f). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0528'23

Impact

The enactment of SB 471 would significantly modify how Michigan law treats firearm possession for those with felony or domestic violence convictions. The bill seeks to enhance public safety by reducing the potential for individuals with violent backgrounds to access firearms. This regulation could also align Michigan with other states that have taken similar steps to restrict firearm access among certain individuals, thereby potentially impacting gun-related crime rates and domestic conflict incidents in the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 471 aims to amend Michigan's firearm laws, specifically regarding the possession of firearms and ammunition by individuals with felony convictions, as well as certain misdemeanor convictions involving domestic violence. Under the proposed amendment to section 224f of the Michigan Penal Code, individuals convicted of a felony would be prohibited from possessing a firearm for three years after fulfilling specific conditions, such as completing imprisonment and paying fines. For specified felonies, this prohibition period extends to five years. Moreover, those convicted of domestic violence-related misdemeanors would be barred from possessing firearms and ammunition for eight years following similar conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 471 appears mixed, with supporters arguing that the bill is a necessary measure to prevent gun violence and enhance community safety. Advocates of stricter gun control laws have praised the bill for its intention to restrict firearm access for those with violent criminal histories. Conversely, opponents express concerns about the potential overreach of the state into personal rights, viewing these restrictions as punitive measures against individuals who may have served their time and sought rehabilitation.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 471 include debates over the fairness of barring individuals from firearm possession for extended periods, particularly in cases where the offenses may not directly relate to gun violence. Critics argue that the bill may disproportionately affect marginalized communities and contribute to ongoing cycles of disadvantage for those trying to reintegrate into society post-conviction. The bill's practical implications on the legal rights of citizens who have completed their sentences and the enforcement of these restrictions also raise questions about implementation and constitutional rights.