Occupations: licensing fees; refrigeration facility and removal service for a dead human body; establish license, registration, and application fees. Amends 1979 PA 152 (MCL 338.2201 - 338.2277) by adding sec. 43a. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0544'23
The introduction of SB 0545 has significant implications for the regulation of refrigeration facilities and removal services in Michigan. By establishing standardized fees, the bill aims to create a more uniform and predictable cost structure for those operating within these professions, potentially encouraging better compliance and oversight. These changes are anticipated to enhance the state's capacity to regulate these fields effectively, ensuring that all practitioners meet the required safety and operational standards. However, it may also lead to increased operational costs for businesses in these sectors.
Senate Bill 0545 aims to amend the 1979 Public Act 152 to establish licensing fees specifically for individuals seeking to operate refrigeration facilities and removal services for deceased bodies in Michigan. This legislative amendment introduces specific fees for various applications and licensing processes, intending to streamline the regulatory framework governing these occupations. The bill sets application processing fees at $225, biannual licensing fees at $300, and initial inspection fees also at $300. Additionally, a $50 fee is included for inspections of additional vehicles used in removal services.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 0545 appears to be largely supportive among legislative leaders and stakeholders in the refrigeration and removal service industries. Proponents see the move as a practical adjustment to enhance regulation and ensure that licensed professionals are equipped to meet state standards. However, there may be concerns from smaller operators regarding the financial burdens that increased licensing fees and inspection costs may impose on their business operations.
While the bill is primarily focused on standardizing fees, there may be contention regarding the necessity of such increases among industry advocates and business owners, especially during economic downturns. Critics might argue that higher fees could limit access to licensure for smaller entities, inadvertently consolidating the industry and stifling competition. Additionally, the requirement for the subsequent enactment of Senate Bill 544 may also complicate the implementation timeline for these new regulations, raising questions about the coordination between related legislative measures.