Michigan Senate Bill SB0849

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/1/24
• Refer: 5/1/24

Caption

Health: occupations; annual report on reciprocity for certain health occupations under the public health code; require the department to submit. Amends 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.1101 - 333.25211) by adding sec. 16186b.

Impact

The bill has the potential to significantly impact occupational licensing regulations within Michigan. It seeks to guarantee that qualified health professionals with licenses from other regions can have their credentials recognized more readily, thereby addressing workforce shortages in the health sector. However, this change also underscores the necessity for the state to ensure the quality and qualifications of those who are licensed, which could necessitate statutory reviews and updates to existing licensing processes.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 849 aims to amend the Public Health Code to include a new section that mandates the Michigan Department of Health to post an annual report online starting June 1, 2025. This report will detail licenses granted based on reciprocity from other states and countries. The intent is to enhance transparency around the licensing of health professionals and facilitate easier access for individuals with equivalent licenses from different jurisdictions. The focus is on streamlining the licensing process for health professionals entering Michigan from other states and countries, ensuring that they can practice effectively without unnecessary barriers.

Contention

While the bill is generally aimed at improving access to health care through easier licensure for out-of-state professionals, some may raise concerns about the implications of reciprocity on state standards. Critics could argue that permitting licenses based on reciprocity might lower the bar for professional qualifications in Michigan, especially if not all states uphold the same rigorous standards. The bill also places a burden on the Department of Health to analyze and report on licensing applications from individuals with out-of-state credentials, which could raise operational questions about the capacity and resources needed to effectively implement this reporting requirement.