Michigan Senate Bill SB0927

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/20/24
• Refer: 6/13/24
• Report Pass: 6/20/24
• Engrossed: 6/20/24
• Refer: 6/20/24
• Report Pass: 12/11/24

Caption

Worker's compensation: other; issuance of policy; modify. Amends sec. 625 of 1969 PA 317 (MCL 418.625).

Impact

The changes proposed by SB 927 are expected to enhance regulatory compliance within Michigan's workers' compensation system. By establishing clearer guidelines for notification of insurance policy issuance, the bill seeks to improve the communication process between insurers and regulatory authorities. This is likely to reduce delays in policy awareness among stakeholders and facilitate smoother claim processing, ultimately benefiting workers dependent on these protections.

Summary

Senate Bill 927 aims to amend the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act of 1969 by modifying Section 625, which pertains to the issuance of worker’s compensation insurance policies. The bill mandates that insurers file a notice of policy issuance with the director within 30 days after the policy's effective date. It allows insurers to submit notices both in writing and via agency-approved electronic filing, streamlining the process for insurance providers and enabling more efficient communication with the state’s regulatory body.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 927 appears to favor modernization and efficiency within the workers' compensation framework. Legislators supporting the bill argue that electronic filing and clearer requirements will alleviate administrative burdens for insurers. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders about the potential implications for worker protections and whether the focus on procedural efficiencies might overshadow the need for comprehensive oversight in the insurance market.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 927 may surface during discussions about the potential impacts on small businesses and workers. Critics might raise concerns that while the bill seeks to streamline processes, it could inadvertently lead to decreased oversight or reduced engagement from insurers. Ensuring that necessary protections remain in place while modernizing the filing and issuance processes will be key to addressing any opposition and ensuring broad legislative support.