Michigan Senate Bill SB1109

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/13/24
• Refer: 11/13/24
• Report Pass: 12/10/24
• Refer: 12/10/24
• Engrossed: 12/11/24
• Refer: 12/11/24

Caption

Elections: petitions; petition circulator to read the summary of the purpose of the petition to the petition signer; provide for. Amends 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.1 - 168.992) by adding sec. 482g.

Impact

The primary impact of SB1109 is that it formalizes a requirement aimed at improving the informed consent of individuals who sign petitions. By mandating that circulators provide or read the summary, the bill ensures that the purpose of each proposed amendment is clearly communicated. Noncompliance with this requirement could lead to civil penalties for the sponsors of petitions, aiming to deter any negligent behavior by circulators. This legislative change will enforce higher standards for accountability and clarity within the petition process, aligning with broader efforts to bolster election integrity.

Summary

Senate Bill 1109 seeks to amend Michigan's election laws, specifically by introducing a requirement for petition circulators to either indicate the location of the summary of the purpose of the proposed amendment or read it aloud to each individual signing the petition. This bill adds section 482g to the existing framework established by the 1954 PA 116 law. The intent behind this legislation is to enhance transparency and ensure that signers are fully informed about the proposals they are endorsing, which is seen as a necessary step in upholding the democratic process.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB1109 is largely positive, especially among those advocating for more rigorous election integrity measures. Proponents argue that the enhanced requirements help protect the rights of voters and ensure they are not misled when supporting ballot measures. On the other hand, critics may view additional requirements for circulators as burdensome, potentially complicating the process of gathering signatures. However, the feeling is predominantly supportive within the legislative discussions, citing the importance of informed participation in the electoral process.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB1109 include the implications of imposing civil fines on petition sponsors for circulator noncompliance. Some legislators expressed concern that these penalties might disproportionately affect grassroots initiatives or smaller organizations that may struggle to comply with the new requirements. Advocates for and against the bill discussed the balance between maintaining robust election safeguards and not encumbering genuine efforts to gather public support for legislative changes. This ongoing discussion reflects the tension between regulatory measures and grassroots democracy.