Michigan Senate Bill SB1181

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/4/24
• Refer: 12/4/24

Caption

Water supply: conservation; limits on water withdrawals under part 327 of the natural resources and environmental protection act; amend. Amends secs. 32707 & 32723 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.32707 & 324.32723) & adds sec. 32707a.

Impact

The bill aims to enhance transparency regarding water usage, likely making it easier for the state to monitor water resources effectively. By mandating that water withdrawal reports include specifics such as location and usage, it encourages stakeholders to engage with water conservation measures actively. This could positively affect the sustainable management of water resources, aligning with state goals for environmental protection and responsible resource utilization. The requirement to submit reports annually is intended to ensure accountability and enables the state to address potential adverse impacts early.

Summary

Senate Bill 1181 aims to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act of 1994 by modifying sections related to water withdrawal permits and reporting requirements. It introduces a requirement for annual reporting on water use for any individual or entity required to register under section 32705 or hold a permit under section 32723. These reports must provide detailed information about the amount of water withdrawn, the sources, uses, and successfully monitored variables such as groundwater levels. The bill emphasizes regular monitoring and requires compliance with environmentally sound practices, suggesting a proactive approach to water management.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB1181 pertains to the financial implications for users of water resources. A provision in the bill states that if an increase in withdrawal capacity necessitates infrastructure improvements, the costs of these improvements cannot be passed on to the public. This raises concerns among potential permit holders, particularly businesses that may face significant costs without the option to recoup expenditures. The stakeholders may argue that while the bill fosters environmental accountability, it places an uncertain financial burden on water providers. Balancing environmental needs with economic feasibility remains a critical aspect of the ongoing discussions regarding this legislation.