Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

Michigan Senate Bill SJRB

Introduced
2/16/23  

Caption

Legislature: rules; bills or initiative petitions to take effect upon the expiration of 90 days after the date they are filed with the secretary of state; provide for. Amends sec. 27, art. IV of the state constitution.

Impact

If passed, this amendment will create a uniform 90-day waiting period for most legislation, thereby altering the existing process where certain laws could take effect more quickly under specific circumstances. Proponents argue that this will enhance public awareness of new laws and provide adequate time for citizens and entities to understand changes in regulation. Additionally, it would introduce a level of deliberation, allowing lawmakers to reconsider decisions before they become effective. This change could lead to increased transparency in the legislative process.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution B (SJRB) proposes an amendment to the Michigan Constitution of 1963. This amendment aims to change the current law concerning when bills or initiative petitions adopted by the legislature take effect. Under SJRB, bills would take effect upon the expiration of 90 days after they are filed with the Secretary of State, unless a two-thirds vote in both houses of the legislature grants immediate effect. This amendment is significant as it seeks to standardize the timeline for legislative enactments across the state, potentially impacting how quickly laws can be enacted following legislative sessions.

Contention

Opponents of SJRB may view this amendment as potentially slowing down the legislative process. Critics argue that the immediate effect provision allows for urgent legislative actions, particularly in response to crises or pressing issues, and that restricting these actions could hinder the legislature's responsiveness. There's also discussion around concerns regarding the burden this waiting period might place on urgent statewide needs where rapid legislative response is critical. As debates unfold, the 90-day rule could emerge as a contentious issue among lawmakers and interest groups focused on timely legislative action.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon