A resolution to support the actions of the Governor of Texas in furtherance of his constitutional right and responsibility to protect the citizens of his state and secure the border.
The resolution emphasizes the constitutional rights of states to protect their sovereignty, particularly in light of perceived federal inaction. It asserts that states have a duty to take measures to secure their borders, especially when the federal government is seen as not upholding its responsibilities. The document cites that over twenty-five governors from other states support Texas's initiatives, indicating a broader concern about border security and immigration policy at a national level.
Senate Resolution No. 91, proposed by Senators Runestad, Daley, and several others, aims to support the actions of the Governor of Texas regarding border security. It underscores the belief that the Biden Administration has failed to secure the southern border, leading to an alarming increase in illegal immigration, drug trafficking, and various associated dangers. The bill articulates significant concerns about the escalating rate of illegal border crossings, citing statistics that indicate millions of encounters with migrants and considerable numbers of individuals on terrorist watch lists. This establishes a context of urgency over what proponents perceive as a border crisis.
Critics of this resolution may view it as an attempt to politicize border security while framing the federal government as negligent. The mention of cartels and associated crime raises alarms about public safety that opponents might contest, arguing that such narratives contribute to fearmongering about immigrants. The resolution's framing may create contention between state and federal powers, particularly regarding the resources and measures states are permitted to enact independently to combat illegal immigration.
The resolution culminates in a formal expression of support for the Texas Governor's actions to enhance border security measures. It also suggests that copies of this resolution be transmitted to various federal leadership figures, highlighting a push for federal acknowledgment of state concerns and potentially urging federal policy shifts.