Michigan House Bill HB4048

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/25
• Refer: 1/30/25
• Report Pass: 4/16/25
• Engrossed: 4/24/25
• Refer: 4/29/25
• Report Pass: 8/13/25
• Refer: 8/13/25
• Enrolled: 8/13/25

Caption

Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; guidelines for dissemination of deep fake sexual images; enact. Amends sec. 17b, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.17b). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4047'25

Impact

If enacted, HB 4048 will bring significant changes to Michigan's criminal law, particularly in how certain offenses are categorized and punished. The introduction of specific charges regarding the dissemination of deep fake images signifies a proactive approach in combatting digital forms of harassment and abuse. The bill aligns with broader efforts to modernize criminal law in response to technological advancements, ensuring that outdated laws are not applied to contemporary issues. It is also tied to the enactment of related legislation, highlighting the importance of a comprehensive legal framework addressing these concerns.

Summary

House Bill 4048 amends the 1927 Public Act 175, specifically targeting the code of criminal procedure. The bill introduces updated sentencing guidelines for felonies related to the dissemination of intimate deep fake images with aggravating factors. This legislative measure aims to address growing concerns regarding the misuse of technology to create and distribute non-consensual sexual images, which has gained notoriety in recent years as a severe violation of privacy and emotional safety for individuals. By creating specific guidelines, the bill intends to ensure that the law can adequately punish offenders of this new type of crime.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 4048 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for privacy rights and victims’ advocacy groups. Many stakeholders express appreciation for the bill’s proactive measures, viewing it as a necessary step in enhancing legal protections against newly emerging threats. However, there are also concerns raised by civil liberties groups regarding potential overreach and the implications of classifying certain behaviors under criminal statutes. This tension illustrates the complexities of addressing modern criminal behavior while safeguarding individual rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention raised in discussions around HB 4048 include the balance between creating appropriate penalties for offenders and ensuring that legitimate forms of expression are not unduly penalized. Critics may worry about definitions within the bill, questioning exactly what constitutes an intimate deep fake and where the line lies between acceptable digital content and illegal harassment. Additionally, the reliance on tied legislative measures, such as the contingent enactment with Senate Bill 4047, indicates the need for a cohesive approach, which might be a point of contention during final discussions.