Michigan House Bill HB4114

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Report Pass: 5/8/25
• Engrossed: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/10/25

Caption

Liquor: liquor control commission; certain liquor code violations not held against a licensee after a certain time; provide for. Amends 1998 PA 58 (MCL 436.1101 - 436.2303) by adding sec. 910.

Impact

If passed, HB4114 would alter the current practices under the Michigan Liquor Control Code, allowing for a more lenient review process for those with previous violations that have aged beyond three years. This could result in more businesses being able to retain their licenses, fostering a more supportive environment for existing liquor licensees across the state. Furthermore, it would encourage rehabilitation and second chances for businesses that may have made mistakes in the past, aligning regulatory practices with contemporary views on accountability and recovery.

Summary

House Bill 4114 aims to amend the Michigan Liquor Control Code of 1998 by adding a provision that restricts the liquor control commission from considering specific violations against a liquor licensee if at least three years have elapsed since the incident. This measure is intended to provide a pathway for licensees to keep their licenses even if they had past violations, thereby potentially reducing the lifetime impact of such violations on their ability to operate legally.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB4114 appears to be favorable among business owners and those advocating for less punitive measures against liquor licensees. Proponents argue that it is a necessary reform that acknowledges growth and change, allowing operators to move forward without the constant shadow of past mistakes. However, there may be concerns regarding public safety and the integrity of regulations, as some argue that ignoring past violations could jeopardize compliance and accountability within the industry.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from stakeholders who are concerned about the implications of allowing past violations to fade into irrelevance over time. Critics may argue that this leniency could lead to a negligent approach to licensing, wherein serious violations are overlooked simply due to the passage of time. Additionally, there may be ongoing debates about how this law impacts community safety standards and the overall credibility of the liquor control commission's enforcement capabilities.