Michigan House Bill HB4285

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/25/25
• Refer: 3/25/25
• Report Pass: 5/21/25
• Engrossed: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/10/25

Caption

Education: curriculum; firearm safety instruction; provide for. Amends 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.1 - 380.1852) by adding sec. 1163a.

Impact

If enacted, HB 4285 will significantly influence educational policies within Michigan schools by integrating firearm safety instruction into the curriculum. This legislation could also facilitate increased awareness and knowledge regarding firearms among young individuals, potentially fostering a culture of responsibility and safety related to firearm use. Schools will have the flexibility to either incorporate this instruction into existing courses or offer it as an extracurricular activity, further providing options for student engagement.

Summary

House Bill 4285 aims to amend the revised school code by introducing mandatory firearm safety instruction for students in grades 6 to 12 across Michigan. By September 1, 2025, the Department of Education, in collaboration with the Department of Natural Resources, is required to establish and provide a model program for firearm safety education. The proposed curriculum is designed to ensure that students learn proper usage, handling, maintenance of firearms, and safe hunting practices under the guidance of certified instructors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4285 appears to be divided among lawmakers and public stakeholders. Proponents of the bill generally advocate for the importance of firearm safety education and perceive the instruction as an essential component of fostering safe practices among youth. Conversely, some critics argue that firearm education in schools could normalize gun ownership and use at a young age, raising concerns about resulting societal impacts and safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 4285 include debates over the appropriateness of firearm education in the school setting and the potential implications for student safety and community values. Opponents express fears that such programs might inadvertently encourage familiarity with firearms in an educational context where issues of gun violence and safety are already pressing concerns. Furthermore, discussions around parental rights in exempting children from this program highlight the necessity for balancing educational requirements with family values and beliefs.