Michigan House Bill HB4401

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/29/25
• Refer: 4/29/25
• Report Pass: 5/21/25
• Engrossed: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/10/25

Caption

Natural resources: hunting; pheasant hunting licensing; eliminate sunset. Amends sec. 43525c of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.43525c).

Impact

The introduction of a mandatory pheasant hunting license is expected to impact the management of state resources by ensuring that a portion of the fees collected is allocated to the pheasant subaccount. This fund is intended for expenses related to the purchase and release of live pheasants on state-owned land suitable for their habitat. With a effective date set for January 1, 2026, this bill represents a legislative response to improve the regulation of hunting practices while promoting the sustainability of wildlife populations.

Summary

House Bill 4401 aims to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act in Michigan by establishing an annual pheasant hunting license fee of $25, required for individuals 18 years or older. This requirement is in addition to existing hunting license regulations. The bill outlines exemptions for specific individuals such as those hunting at licensed game bird preserves, on private land (unless it's part of the hunting access program), public land in the Upper Peninsula, and those with certain lifetime licenses. This amendment seeks to regulate pheasant hunting to enhance oversight and conservation efforts.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 4401 have been generally positive among those advocating for wildlife management and conservation, as it represents a proactive approach to ensuring sustainable pheasant hunting in Michigan. Supporters argue that the fees collected will aid in habitat restoration and wildlife management. However, there may be concerns from some hunters regarding the additional fee, which could be seen as a financial burden or an unnecessary regulatory step.

Contention

A point of contention may arise regarding the necessity and the implications of requiring an additional license for pheasant hunting. Some stakeholders might argue that hunters already face numerous regulations and fees, and this could deter participation in the sport. There could also be debates about how the funds from the licensing fees will be managed and whether they will effectively contribute to conservation efforts. The anticipated repeal of the section effective January 1, 2026 adds another layer of discussion about the long-term sustainability and effectiveness of the proposed licensing scheme.