Michigan House Bill HB4425

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/6/25
• Refer: 5/6/25

Caption

Corporate income tax: other; sustainable aviation fuel incentive program; create. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4424'25

Impact

The implementation of HB4425 is expected to positively impact Michigan's energy policy and climate change initiatives by encouraging more businesses to produce and utilize SAF. The bill sets a structured approach in awarding tax credits, thus potentially leading to increased investments in clean energy technologies. Moreover, it aligns Michigan's aviation sector with broader national and international sustainability goals, aiding in the transition towards lower-emission aviation systems. The framework of this program may also provide a template for future state-level environmental policies aimed at carbon reduction.

Summary

House Bill 4425, known as the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Incentive Program Act, aims to establish an incentive program to encourage the production and usage of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) within the state of Michigan. The bill's primary goal is to support tax deductions for businesses engaged in producing or blending SAF, thus promoting environmentally sustainable practices in the aviation industry. By defining sustainable aviation fuel as those derived from biomass or waste streams that achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional fossil fuels, HB4425 sets clear standards for eligibility in the tax credit program.

Contention

While HB4425 generally promotes sustainable practices, there could be points of contention among stakeholders regarding compliance and administration of the incentive program. The details of application processes, criteria for certification, and penalties for fraud could lead to debates on whether the regulations are too lenient or overly burdensome for small firms. Additionally, there may be concerns about the adequacy of funding for such tax credits, with initial funding capped at $4.5 million in the first fiscal year and $9 million in subsequent years, which some may argue is insufficient to drive significant change in the aviation fuel market.