Michigan House Bill HR0142

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/24/25
• Refer: 7/24/25

Caption

A resolution to urge the federal government to ensure continued funding, and reinstate staff, of the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) as they negotiate the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” so that Michigan can continue its Home Heating Credit Program.

Impact

This resolution mainly affects the residents of Michigan who qualify for the Home Heating Credit Program, particularly targeting low-income families, deaf or disabled individuals, and veterans. It underscores that approximately 248,765 Michigan taxpayers benefitted from LIHEAP in 2022, demonstrating the significant reach of the program. The representatives appointed to testify emphasized that without continual federal assistance, the Home Heating Credit Program could face severe operational challenges, potentially leading to increased hardships for a significant portion of the population.

Summary

House Resolution No. 142 advocates for the continuation and reinstatement of funding and staff for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) as the federal government negotiates the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' The resolution highlights the importance of the program in ensuring that low-income Michigan residents can receive assistance with their heating expenses, especially critical during energy crises and seasonal demands. The LIHEAP program provides essential support, including weatherization and home energy repairs, which are vital for maintaining safety and health in households reliant on these services.

Contention

Issues arise from the overall threat posed by potential cuts to LIHEAP funding recommended by federal authorities, specifically pointing out that eliminating such funding could have disastrous consequences for those who rely on these funds for heating assistance. Furthermore, the potential job losses caused by the firing of LIHEAP staff could result in payment delays for eligible individuals, compounding the already dire financial situations of many recipients. While supporters of the bill argue for the necessity of preserving this assistance, critics express concerns about the federal government's commitment to maintaining essential social programs amid broader budgetary negotiations.