Michigan Senate Bill SB0214

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Report Pass: 5/8/25
• Refer: 5/8/25

Caption

Economic development: other; strategic advisory board; create, and provide for the development of strategic plans. Amends 1984 PA 270 (MCL 125.2001 - 125.2094) by adding secs. 9a & 9b. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0213'25

Impact

The introduction of SB0214 will centralize strategic planning for economic development in Michigan, intending to streamline processes and increase collaboration among stakeholders. By creating this advisory board, the bill seeks to unify different sectors, including transit, small business, and community organizations, in order to effectively address economic challenges and explore new opportunities for growth. However, this change may also raise concerns regarding local governance as some stakeholders might perceive it as an encroachment on local decision-making processes.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 214 aims to amend the Michigan Strategic Fund Act (1984 PA 270) by establishing a Strategic Advisory Board dedicated to promoting economic development and planning within the state. This board will be responsible for developing strategic plans to advance economic opportunities, thereby enhancing the state's ability to attract and retain businesses. The bill outlines the composition of the board, specifying voting and non-voting members who bring various expertise in areas such as business, transportation, and community development, ensuring a comprehensive approach to economic strategy.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB0214 is its potential implications for local control and decision-making authority. Critics may argue that centralizing economic development strategies diverts power away from local governments and communities who understand their unique needs best. The structure of the advisory board, comprising various experts appointed by the governor, might also lead to biases towards specific regional interests, thereby challenging equitable representation across the entire state. Additionally, the balance between voting and non-voting members raises questions on how effectively diverse opinions will be integrated into the strategic planning process.