Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

Michigan Senate Bill SB0227

Introduced
4/17/25  

Caption

Human services: food assistance; purchase of certain beverages with supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) benefits; prohibit. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding sec. 109s.

Impact

If the waiver is granted, Michiganders using SNAP benefits would be prohibited from purchasing sodas with those benefits. This legislative move is seen as an effort to promote healthier dietary choices among low-income populations who rely on SNAP. Advocates argue that reducing the eligibility of sugary beverages in assistance programs can help combat obesity and related health issues in vulnerable communities. Conversely, if the waiver is not granted, the Department is required to petition for this exclusion annually, indicating sustained efforts to alter the current eligibility standards.

Summary

SB0227 proposes an amendment to the Michigan Social Welfare Act, specifically targeting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. The bill mandates that the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services request a waiver from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to exclude soda from the list of foods eligible for purchase with SNAP benefits. The bill defines 'soda' as any nonalcoholic beverage containing natural or artificial sweeteners, explicitly excluding beverages that contain milk or milk substitutes or those with over 50% vegetable or fruit juice by volume.

Contention

The primary points of contention surrounding SB0227 involve debates over nutritional equity and personal choice. Supporters of the bill argue that limiting access to unhealthy food options for SNAP recipients can lead to improved health outcomes and lower healthcare costs in the long run. However, opponents assert that such measures may unfairly target economically disadvantaged individuals, restricting their freedom to choose what they purchase with their benefits. Critics may also raise concerns about the efficacy of such bans in influencing dietary habits and question whether the government should dictate food choices, even when utilizing public assistance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.