Human services: services or financial assistance; low-income water residential affordability program task force; create. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding sec. 14q. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0248'25, SB 0250'25, SB 0252'25
The establishment of this task force is designed to address the affordability of water services for low-income households, thus playing a critical role in enhancing public welfare and social equity. The task force will work on developing guidance and educational materials, seek additional funding, and explore ways to expand affordability programs. This may lead to significant changes in how water and sewer services are provided and funded in Michigan, especially for vulnerable populations. The initiative highlights a commitment to ensuring every resident has access to necessary utility services without financial hardship.
Senate Bill 249 aims to amend the 1939 Public Act 280, also known as 'The Social Welfare Act', to establish a low-income water residential affordability program task force. This bill requires the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to create this task force within 30 days of the bill's effective date. The task force will consist of a diverse group of stakeholders, including representatives from small water providers, consumer advocacy groups, community action agencies, municipal governments, and environmental groups. The goal is to advise the department on best practices to administer the program aimed at making water and sewerage services more affordable for low-income residents.
While the bill shares a common goal of enhancing water affordability, it is tied to the enactment of other related bills (SB 248, SB 250, and SB 252). This connection may cause delays or complications in implementation depending on the legislative journey of these associated bills. The diversity of the task force could also lead to varying opinions on the best approaches to address water affordability, especially among different representatives of rural and urban communities. Stakeholders may have differing views on funding allocations, preventive measures, and the scope of services included in the affordability program, making ongoing dialogue essential.