Michigan Senate Bill SB0285

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/7/25
• Refer: 5/7/25
• Report Pass: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/4/25
• Report Pass: 6/5/25
• Engrossed: 6/10/25
• Refer: 6/10/25

Caption

Family law: marriage and divorce; persons authorized to solemnize marriage; modify. Amends sec. 7 of 1846 RS 83 (MCL 551.7). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0286'25

Impact

The proposed amendments to SB 285 significantly affect how marriages can be solemnized in Michigan State. With the inclusion of civil celebrants, individuals who align their services with the wishes of the couple can now officiate marriages, broadening access and offering more personalized wedding experiences. Furthermore, permitting state legislators to solemnize marriages introduces an additional avenue for residents, likely increasing the number of available officiants, especially in underserved areas.

Summary

Senate Bill 285 aims to amend the existing Michigan law concerning the solemnization of marriages as outlined in section 7 of the 1846 RS 83. The bill expands the list of individuals authorized to solemnize marriages, which now includes civil celebrants and state legislators alongside judges, mayors, and ordained ministers. This change is intended to provide couples with more options for who can solemnize their marriage, reflecting contemporary practices and preferences regarding marriage ceremonies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 285 appears to be largely positive among its supporters, who advocate for greater flexibility and choice in marriage officiation. Proponents argue that this bill caters to modern society's diverse values and practices regarding marriage while simplifying processes for couples. However, there are concerns regarding the qualifications of civil celebrants and the potential for inconsistent officiation standards, which may elicit skepticism from more traditional viewpoints.

Contention

While there is general support for expanding who can solemnize marriages, some stakeholders have expressed contention regarding the inclusion of civil celebrants and state legislators. Critics question whether these individuals possess the necessary training or experience to navigate the legal requirements for marriage solemnization, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding the integrity of the marriage institution. This raises issues regarding the legal implications of such changes and their effects on future marriage practices within Michigan.