Michigan Senate Bill SB0502

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/13/25
• Refer: 8/13/25

Caption

Crimes: terrorism; crime of making terrorist threat or false report of terrorism; modify. Amends sec. 543m of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.543m).

Impact

The proposed legislation carries significant implications for state law, as it aims to create a more stringent framework to combat and penalize terrorist threats and false reports. If enacted, the modifications could enhance the ability of law enforcement to address such incidents, reflecting a zero-tolerance approach towards threats of terrorism. The penalties under this bill categorize making terrorist threats as a felony, punishable by imprisonment for up to 20 years and/or hefty fines. This aspect of the bill signals a serious approach to ensuring public safety while responding to the ever-evolving landscape of security threats.

Summary

Senate Bill 502 aims to amend the Michigan penal code concerning terrorist threats and false reports of terrorism. The bill expands the definition of making a terrorist threat or falsely reporting an act of terrorism, establishing clear language that outlines what constitutes a violation. It specifies that a person can be charged if they threaten to commit an act of terrorism and communicate that threat in such a way that it would be understood as a threat of violence or if they communicate a false report knowing that it is untrue. This section solidifies the accountability of individuals in making threats or false claims related to terrorism.

Contention

Notably, the bill may provoke discussions regarding the balance between public safety and the potential for overreach in law enforcement practices. Critics may argue that broad definitions of threats could lead to disproportionate punishments for individuals who may not be serious or capable of committing terrorist acts. The concerns center around the possible chilling effects on free speech and the risks of misinterpretation of communications that could be deemed threats under the new provisions. This contention highlights the delicate line that lawmakers must navigate in creating effective yet fair legislation.