Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF2092

Introduced
2/20/23  
Refer
2/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  

Caption

Metropolitan governance task force created.

Impact

This legislation is poised to impact the governance of the Metropolitan Council significantly by allowing for a collaborative evaluation of potential reforms. By including diverse stakeholders such as city representatives, county commissioners, and public members, the task force aims to create recommendations that reflect the needs of the metropolitan area. The final report on the task force’s findings is due February 1, 2024, which is expected to provide legislators with informed recommendations for possible changes to the council's structure and authority.

Summary

HF2092 establishes a task force on metropolitan governance in Minnesota, aiming to evaluate and recommend reforms related to the Metropolitan Council. The bill is intended to facilitate a comprehensive review of the current governance structure and explore alternatives for improving the effectiveness of the council. The task force will analyze different governance models, including options for direct election of council members, and assess the benefits and drawbacks of these alternatives to the existing system.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HF2092 appears to be generally positive among supporters who view the formation of the task force as a timely and necessary step toward improving governance in the metropolitan area. Proponents believe that evaluating various governance structures could lead to more representative and accountable decision-making. However, there are concerns from some stakeholders about the implications of potential changes and the need to maintain local control over regional issues.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HF2092 include debates over the composition of the task force and the methods of governance proposed for the Metropolitan Council. Some advocates argue for a fully elected council as a means to enhance accountability, while others suggest that a mix of appointed and elected officials may offer a balanced approach. The discussions are likely to reveal differing philosophies about how best to govern the metropolitan area while considering the unique challenges facing local governments.

Companion Bills

MN SF1624

Similar To Election provision of Metropolitan Council members

Similar Bills

CO HB1219

Requirements for Better Understanding Metropolitan Districts

CA AB580

Surface mining: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

TN HB0471

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 7; Title 13 and Title 66, relative to regulation of development.

CA AB442

Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975: exemption: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: master reclamation plan.

CA AB1060

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

MD HB887

St. Mary’s County – Metropolitan Commission – New Facilities

TN HB0048

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2; Title 5; Title 6 and Title 7, relative to local government.

CO HB1267

Metropolitan District Covenant Enforcement Policy