Fiscal constraints; a resolution memorializing Congress to call a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution to impose fiscal constraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress.
If passed, HF667 could significantly alter the relationship between state and federal authorities, reinforcing the notion of state autonomy in the face of federal activities. Supporters argue that it empowers states to reclaim their rights and responsibilities, potentially enabling mechanisms for immediate redress against federal encroachments. By limiting the federal jurisdiction and imposing fiscal constraints, proponents claim the resolution can help restore fiscal responsibility and accountability within the federal hierarchy.
HF667 is a resolution from the Minnesota Legislature that memorializes Congress to call for a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution. The proposed amendments aim to impose fiscal constraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and define term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. This move is motivated by concerns over national debt and perceived federal overreach into state governance, aligning with a belief that states should guard liberty against federal abuses of power.
Notably, the resolution faces opposition from those who argue that calling a convention carries risks of unintended consequences, including the potential for broader amendments that could undermine essential rights or protections. Critics caution against the dangers of opening the Constitution to amendments that might not align with contemporary federal-state dynamics. This contention suggests a divide in perspectives on governance, highlighting a tension between calls for serious reform and the hesitance to radically alter constitutional foundations.