State Board of Investment prohibited from investing in assets that exclude Minnesota-based energy or natural resources companies or Minnesota-based agricultural or livestock companies, divestment of assets required, types of discrimination in financial services prohibited, civil penalties provided, and annual reports required.
Impact
The bill imposes requirements on the State Board of Investment, mandating divestiture from non-compliant assets while ensuring accountability through quarterly reports on the progress made. This initiative could result in significant changes in state investment strategies, compelling financial managers to reconsider their portfolios in light of Minnesota's legislative stance on local investment discrimination. The legislation is aimed at protecting local industries from perceived biases in investment practices, thus providing a safeguard against external pressures that might prioritize environmental or social factors over robust local economic support.
Summary
House File 707 (HF707) is a legislative measure focused on investment prohibitions and discrimination in financial services within the state of Minnesota. The bill is designed to prevent the State Board of Investment from investing in assets that intentionally exclude Minnesota-based energy or natural resources companies and agricultural or livestock companies. The intention is to divest from such assets over a set timeline, ensuring that by the end of 15 months post-enactment, there are no direct state investments in entities that discriminate against Minnesota-based sectors under the guise of environmental, social, or governance criteria.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding HF707 is its restriction on the practices of financial institutions regarding the provision of services based on any type of social credit scores or environmental considerations. Opponents may view this as limiting the ability of financial institutions to engage in socially responsible investing or allocate resources based on sustainability criteria. The bill introduces civil penalties for violations, which could anticipate disputes over interpretations of discrimination in financial services, raising concerns over potential litigation costs for financial institutions that may inadvertently run afoul of the new regulations.
Similar To
State Board of Investment investing in certain assets that exclude Minnesota-based energy or natural resources companies or Minnesota-based agricultural or livestock companies prohibition; divestment of these assets requirement; financial services discrimination prohibition
State Board of Investment investing in certain assets that exclude Minnesota-based energy or natural resources companies or Minnesota-based agricultural or livestock companies prohibition; divestment of these assets requirement; financial services discrimination prohibition
State Board of Investment prohibited from investing in companies that boycott mining, energy production, production agriculture, or commercial lumber production; State Board of Investment required to divest from companies boycotting said industries; state agency contracts prohibited; and certain financial institution discrimination prohibited.
State Board of Investment prohibited from investing in companies that boycott mining, energy production, production agriculture, or commercial lumber production; State Board required to divest; state entities prohibited from entering into contracts; banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions prohibited from discriminating against people based on subjective criteria; and civil penalties provided.
Prohibiting discrimination by financial services companies on the basis of social credit score and requiring registered investment advisers to obtain written consent from clients prior to investing client moneys in mutual funds, equity funds, companies and financial institutions that engage in ideological boycotts.