Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SC9

Introduced
3/4/24  
Passed
3/4/24  
Engrossed
3/4/24  
Refer
3/4/24  

Caption

A Senate concurrent resolution relating to adjournment for more than three days

Impact

The passage of SC9 could have meaningful implications for the legislative process within the state. By allowing the Senate and House to agree on longer periods of adjournment, it can facilitate more comprehensive discussions on important legislation. This change reflects a recognition of the complexity of lawmaking, where extended deliberation may be necessary to reach suitable agreements on key issues. Additionally, this resolution could minimize disruptions that typically accompany shorter adjournments, leading to a smoother legislative flow.

Summary

SC9 is a Senate concurrent resolution concerning the schedule for legislative adjournments in the State of Minnesota. Specifically, it allows both the Senate and House of Representatives to adjourn for periods exceeding three days under predefined conditions. The resolution outlines specific adjournment dates, permitting an extension of the legislative session when necessary, which is crucial for ensuring that lawmakers can adequately address pending issues without being constrained by short adjournment periods.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SC9 appears to be generally supportive among legislators who understand the necessity of addressing legislative complexities and the need for more flexible scheduling. Lawmakers expressed a collective acceptance of the resolution as a pragmatic approach to managing the legislative agenda, especially in times when pressing issues and discussions require extended attention.

Contention

While SC9 does not appear to have generated significant contention, it is important to recognize that any changes to legislative adjournment processes can sometimes face scrutiny from minority parties or groups concerned about the implications on governance efficiency and public accountability. Critics may argue that extended adjournment might delay crucial decisions or reduce the time available for public input into legislative processes. However, no specific significant opposition has been documented in this case.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.