Constitutional amendment proposal to require a supermajority vote of the legislature for passing laws that increase state revenues
Impact
The proposed amendment, if passed, would fundamentally alter the legislative process related to taxation by establishing a higher threshold for revenue-increasing measures. As a result, this could make it significantly more difficult for future legislatures to increase state funding for public services, infrastructure, and other critical areas reliant on taxpayer contributions. The requirement for a two-thirds majority could lead to stalemates, especially in divided legislatures, and may prompt debates over the ramifications of such a restrictive approach to tax policy.
Summary
SF1838 proposes a significant change to the Minnesota Constitution by requiring a supermajority vote in both houses of the legislature to pass any law that increases state revenues. This includes changes to existing taxes, tax credits, fees, or the introduction of new taxes or fees. The bill is framed as a way to promote fiscal responsibility and limit tax increases without broader legislative consensus, thereby giving more power to a minority of legislators to block tax legislation.
Contention
Notably, the bill has sparked considerable debate among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that it will safeguard taxpayers by preventing hasty increases in taxation, whereas opponents contend that it undermines the legislative process and could jeopardize essential services that depend on adequate funding. Critics suggest that requiring a supermajority may overly politicize tax decisions, making it more challenging to respond to economic needs through government revenue adjustments.
Proposes constitutional amendment to require two-thirds majority vote by Legislature for bills proposing a new or increased State tax, fee, surcharge or civil penalty.
Proposes constitutional amendment to require two-thirds majority vote by Legislature for bills proposing a new or increased State tax, fee, surcharge or civil penalty.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to require a two-thirds vote of the legislature to enact and submit to the voters a law imposing an income tax or increasing that tax.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to require a four-fifths vote of the legislature to enact and submit to the voters a law imposing an income tax or increasing that tax.