Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF255 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
11 1.1 A bill for an act​
22 1.2 relating to competency attainment; making certain technical changes; appropriating​
33 1.3 money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2022, sections 611.41, subdivisions 2, 5, 6,​
44 1.4 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, by adding a subdivision; 611.42, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 611.43,​
55 1.5 subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 611.44, subdivisions 1, 2; 611.45, subdivision 3; 611.46,​
66 1.6 subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 611.47; 611.48; 611.49; 611.51; 611.55; 611.56;​
77 1.7 611.57; 611.58; 611.59; Laws 2022, chapter 99, article 3, section 1.​
88 1.8BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:​
99 1.9 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
1010 1.10 Subd. 2.Alternative program."Alternative program" means any mental health or​
1111 1.11substance use disorder treatment or program that is not a certified competency restoration​
1212 1.12attainment program but may assist a defendant in attaining competency.​
1313 1.13 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, is amended by adding a subdivision to​
1414 1.14read:​
1515 1.15 Subd. 4a.Competency."Competency" means the ability to understand criminal​
1616 1.16proceedings, consult with counsel, and participate in the defense.​
1717 1.17 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 5, is amended to read:​
1818 1.18 Subd. 5.Competency restoration attainment program."Competency restoration​
1919 1.19attainment program" means a structured program of clinical and educational services that​
2020 1.20is certified and designed to identify and address barriers to a defendant's ability to understand​
2121 1.21the criminal proceedings, consult with counsel, and participate in the defense.​
2222 1​Sec. 3.​
23-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​
23+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL
2424 SENATE​
2525 STATE OF MINNESOTA​
2626 S.F. No. 255​NINETY-THIRD SESSION​
2727 (SENATE AUTHORS: DRAHEIM and Latz)​
2828 OFFICIAL STATUS​D-PG​DATE​
29-Introduction and first reading​175​01/12/2023​
30-Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety​
31-Comm report: To pass as amended and re-refer to Finance​02/01/2023​ 2.1 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 6, is amended to read:​
29+Introduction and first reading​01/12/2023​
30+Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety​ 2.1 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 6, is amended to read:​
3231 2.2 Subd. 6.Competency restoration attainment services."Competency restoration​
3332 2.3attainment services" means education provided by certified individuals to for defendants​
3433 2.4found incompetent to proceed provided by certified individuals using the approved curriculum​
3534 2.5to address barriers to a defendant's ability to understand the criminal proceedings, consult​
3635 2.6with counsel, and participate in the defense. Educational services must use the curriculum​
3736 2.7certified by the State Competency Restoration Board as the foundation for delivering​
3837 2.8competency restoration education. Competency restoration attainment services does not​
3938 2.9include housing assistance or programs, social services, or treatment that must be provided​
4039 2.10by a licensed professional including mental health treatment, substance use disorder​
4140 2.11treatment, or co-occurring disorders treatment.​
4241 2.12 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 7, is amended to read:​
4342 2.13 Subd. 7.Court examiner."Court examiner" means a person appointed to serve the​
4443 2.14court, by examining a defendant whose competency is at issue and who is a physician or​
4544 2.15licensed psychologist who has a doctoral degree in psychology.​
4645 2.16 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 8, is amended to read:​
4746 2.17 Subd. 8.Forensic navigator."Forensic navigator" means a person who meets the​
4847 2.18certification and continuing education requirements under section 611.56, subdivision 2,​
49-2.19paragraph (b), clause (3), hired or contracted to facilitate competency attainment services,​
50-2.20supervise certain defendants found to be incompetent, prepare bridge plans, and provides​
51-2.21provide the other services under section 611.55, subdivision 3.​
52-2.22 Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 9, is amended to read:​
53-2.23 Subd. 9.Head of the program."Head of the program" means the head of the competency​
54-2.24restoration attainment program or the head of the facility or program where the defendant​
55-2.25is being served.​
56-2.26 Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 10, is amended to read:​
57-2.27 Subd. 10.Jail-based program."Jail-based program" means a competency restoration​
58-2.28attainment program that operates within a correctional facility licensed by the commissioner​
59-2.29of corrections under section 241.021 that meets the capacity standards governing jail facilities.​
60-2.30A jail-based program may not be granted a variance to exceed its operational capacity.​
48+2.19paragraph (b), clause (3), hired or contracted to facilitate competency examinations and a​
49+2.20defendant's participation in competency attainment services, supervise certain defendants​
50+2.21found to be incompetent, prepare bridge plans, and provides provide the other services under​
51+2.22section 611.55, subdivision 3.​
52+2.23 Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 9, is amended to read:​
53+2.24 Subd. 9.Head of the program."Head of the program" means the head of the competency​
54+2.25restoration attainment program or the head of the facility or program where the defendant​
55+2.26is being served.​
56+2.27 Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 10, is amended to read:​
57+2.28 Subd. 10.Jail-based program."Jail-based program" means a competency restoration​
58+2.29attainment program that operates within a correctional facility licensed by the commissioner​
59+2.30of corrections under section 241.021 that meets the capacity standards governing jail facilities.​
60+2.31A jail-based program may not be granted a variance to exceed its operational capacity.​
6161 2​Sec. 8.​
62-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 3.1 Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 13, is amended to read:​
62+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 3.1 Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 13, is amended to read:​
6363 3.2 Subd. 13.State-operated treatment program."State-operated treatment program"​
6464 3.3means any state-operated program, including community behavioral health hospitals hospital,​
6565 3.4crisis centers center, residential facilities facility, outpatient services service, and or other​
6666 3.5community-based services developed and program operated by the state and under the​
6767 3.6control of the commissioner of human services, for a person who has mental illness,​
6868 3.7developmental disability, or substance use disorder.​
6969 3.8 Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 14, is amended to read:​
7070 3.9 Subd. 14.Suspend the criminal proceedings."Suspend the criminal proceedings"​
7171 3.10means nothing can be heard or decided on to cease all hearings and decisions regarding the​
7272 3.11merits of the criminal charges except that but not terminate the jurisdiction of the court​
7373 3.12retains jurisdiction in all or prevent hearings or decisions in any other matters, including​
7474 3.13but not limited to establishing or modifying bail, conditions of release, probation conditions,​
7575 3.14no contact orders, and appointment of counsel.​
7676 3.15 Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.41, subdivision 16, is amended to read:​
7777 3.16 Subd. 16.Treatment facility."Treatment facility" means a non-state-operated hospital,​
7878 3.17residential treatment provider, crisis residential withdrawal management center, or corporate​
7979 3.18foster care home that is not operated by the state and is qualified to provide care and treatment​
8080 3.19for persons who have mental illness, developmental disability, or substance use disorder.​
8181 3.20 Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.42, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
8282 3.21 Subd. 2.Waiver of counsel in competency proceedings.(a) A defendant must not be​
8383 3.22allowed to waive counsel if the defendant lacks ability to:​
8484 3.23 (1) knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive the right to counsel;​
8585 3.24 (2) appreciate the consequences of proceeding without counsel;​
8686 3.25 (3) comprehend the nature of the charge;​
8787 3.26 (4) comprehend the nature of the proceedings;​
8888 3.27 (5) comprehend the possible punishment; or​
8989 3.28 (6) comprehend any other matters essential to understanding the case.​
9090 3.29 (b) The court must not proceed under this law section before a lawyer consults with the​
9191 3.30defendant and has an opportunity to be heard.​
9292 3​Sec. 12.​
93-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 4.1 Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.42, subdivision 3, is amended to read:​
93+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 4.1 Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.42, subdivision 3, is amended to read:​
9494 4.2 Subd. 3.Competency motion.(a) At any time, the prosecutor or defense counsel may​
9595 4.3make a motion challenging the defendant's competency, or the court on its initiative may​
9696 4.4raise the issue. The defendant's consent is not required to bring a competency motion. The​
9797 4.5motion shall be supported by specific facts but shall not include communications between​
9898 4.6the defendant and defense counsel if disclosure would violate attorney-client privilege. By​
9999 4.7bringing the motion, the defendant does not waive attorney-client privilege.​
100100 4.8 (b) If competency is at issue, the court shall appoint a forensic navigator to provide the​
101101 4.9forensic navigator services described in section 611.55 for the defendant, including​
102102 4.10development of a specific bridge plan to identify appropriate housing and services if the​
103103 4.11defendant is released from custody or any charges are dismissed.​
104104 4.12 (c) In felony, gross misdemeanor, and targeted misdemeanor cases, if the court determines​
105105 4.13there is a reasonable basis to doubt the defendant's competence competency and there is​
106106 4.14probable cause for the charge, the court must suspend the criminal proceedings and order​
107107 4.15an examination of the defendant under section 611.43.​
108108 4.16 (d) In misdemeanor cases, other than cases involving a targeted misdemeanor, if the​
109109 4.17court determines there is a reasonable basis to doubt the defendant's competence competency​
110110 4.18and there is probable cause for the charge, the court must suspend the criminal proceedings.​
111111 4.19The court may order an examination of the defendant under section 611.43 if the examination​
112112 4.20is in the public interest. For purposes of this paragraph, an examination is in the public​
113113 4.21interest when it is necessary to assess whether the defendant has a cognitive impairment or​
114114 4.22mental illness; determine whether a defendant has the ability to access housing, food, income,​
115115 4.23disability verification, medications, and treatment for medical conditions; or whether a​
116116 4.24defendant has the ability to otherwise address any basic needs. The court shall order the​
117117 4.25forensic navigator to complete a bridge plan as described in section 611.55, subdivision 4,​
118118 4.26and submit it to the court. The court may dismiss the charge upon receipt of the bridge plan​
119119 4.27without holding a hearing unless either party objects.​
120120 4.28 Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.42, subdivision 4, is amended to read:​
121121 4.29 Subd. 4.Dismissal, referrals for services, and collaboration.(a) Except as provided​
122122 4.30in this subdivision, when the court determines there is a reasonable basis to doubt the a​
123123 4.31defendant's competence competency and orders an examination of the defendant, a forensic​
124124 4.32navigator must complete a bridge plan with the defendant as described in section 611.55,​
125125 4.33subdivision 4, submit the bridge plan to the court, and provide a written copy to the defendant​
126126 4.34before the court or prosecutor dismisses any charges based on a belief or finding that the​
127127 4​Sec. 14.​
128-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 5.1defendant is incompetent. The court may dismiss a case where the most serious charge is​
128+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 5.1defendant is incompetent. The court may dismiss a case where the most serious charge is​
129129 5.2a misdemeanor, other than a targeted misdemeanor, without holding a hearing unless either​
130130 5.3party objects.​
131131 5.4 (b) If for any reason a forensic navigator has not been appointed, the court must make​
132132 5.5every reasonable effort to coordinate with any resources available to the court and refer the​
133133 5.6defendant for possible assessment and social services, including but not limited to services​
134134 5.7for engagement under section 253B.041, before dismissing any charges based on a finding​
135135 5.8that the defendant is incompetent.​
136136 5.9 (c) If working with the forensic navigator or coordinating a referral to services would​
137137 5.10cause an unreasonable delay in the release of a defendant being held in custody, the court​
138138 5.11may release the defendant. If a defendant has not been engaged for assessment and referral​
139139 5.12before release, the court may coordinate with the forensic navigator or any resources available​
140140 5.13to the court to engage the defendant for up to 90 days after release.​
141141 5.14 (d) Courts may partner and collaborate with county social services, community-based​
142142 5.15programs, jails, and any other available resource available to the court to provide referrals​
143143 5.16to services when a defendant's competency is at issue or a defendant has been found​
144144 5.17incompetent to proceed.​
145145 5.18 (e) Counsel for the defendant may bring a motion to dismiss the proceedings in the​
146146 5.19interest of justice at any stage of the proceedings.​
147147 5.20 Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.43, subdivision 1, is amended to read:​
148148 5.21 Subdivision 1.Competency examination.(a) If the court orders an examination pursuant​
149149 5.22to section 611.42, subdivision 3, the court shall appoint a court examiner to examine the​
150150 5.23defendant and report to the court on the defendant's competency to proceed. A court examiner​
151151 5.24may obtain from court administration and review the report of any prior or subsequent​
152152 5.25examination under this section or under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.​
153153 5.26 (b) If the defendant is not entitled to release, the court shall order the defendant to​
154154 5.27participate in an examination where the defendant is being held, or the court may order that​
155155 5.28the defendant be confined in a treatment facility, locked treatment facility, or a state-operated​
156156 5.29treatment facility until the examination is completed.​
157157 5.30 (c) If the defendant is entitled to release, the court shall order the defendant to appear​
158158 5.31for an examination. If the defendant fails to appear at an examination, the court may amend​
159159 5.32the conditions of release and bail pursuant to Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule​
160160 5.336.​
161161 5​Sec. 15.​
162-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 6.1 (d) A competency examination ordered under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure,​
162+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 6.1 (d) A competency examination ordered under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure,​
163163 6.2rule 20.04, shall proceed under subdivision 2 this section.​
164164 6.3 Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.43, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
165165 6.4 Subd. 2.Report of examination.(a) The court-appointed court examiner's written report​
166166 6.5shall be filed with the court and served on provided to the prosecutor and defense counsel​
167167 6.6by the court. The report shall be filed no more than 30 days after the order for examination​
168168 6.7of a defendant in custody unless extended by the court for good cause. If the defendant is​
169169 6.8out of custody or confined in a noncorrectional state-operated treatment program or treatment​
170170 6.9facility, the report shall be filed no more than 60 days after the order for examination, unless​
171171 6.10extended by the court for good cause. The report shall not include opinions concerning the​
172172 6.11defendant's mental condition at the time of the alleged offense or any statements made by​
173173 6.12the defendant regarding the alleged criminal conduct, unless necessary to support the​
174174 6.13examiner's opinion regarding competence or incompetence.​
175175 6.14 (b) The report shall include an evaluation of the defendant's mental health, cognition,​
176176 6.15and the factual basis for opinions about:​
177177 6.16 (1) any diagnoses made, and the results of any testing conducted with the defendant;​
178178 6.17 (2) the defendant's competency to stand trial;​
179179 6.18 (3) the level of care and education required for the defendant to attain, be restored to,​
180180 6.19or maintain competency;​
181181 6.20 (4) a recommendation of the least restrictive setting appropriate to meet the defendant's​
182182 6.21needs for restoration attaining competency and immediate safety;​
183183 6.22 (5) the impact of any substance use disorder on the defendant, including the defendant's​
184184 6.23competency, and any recommendations for treatment;​
185185 6.24 (6) the likelihood the defendant will attain competency in the reasonably foreseeable​
186186 6.25future;​
187187 6.26 (7) whether the defendant poses a substantial likelihood of physical harm to self or​
188188 6.27others; and​
189189 6.28 (8) if the court examiner's opinion is that the defendant is incompetent to proceed, the​
190190 6.29report must include an opinion as to whether the defendant possesses capacity to make​
191191 6.30decisions regarding neuroleptic medication unless the examiner is unable to render an​
192192 6.31opinion on capacity. If the examiner is unable to render an opinion on capacity, the report​
193193 6.32must document the reasons why the examiner is unable to render that opinion.​
194194 6​Sec. 16.​
195-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 7.1 (c) If the court examiner determines that the defendant presents an imminent risk of​
195+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 7.1 (c) If the court examiner determines that the defendant presents an imminent risk of​
196196 7.2serious danger to another, is imminently suicidal, or otherwise needs emergency intervention,​
197197 7.3the examiner must promptly notify the court, prosecutor, defense counsel, and those​
198198 7.4responsible for the care and custody of the defendant.​
199199 7.5 (d) If the defendant appears for the examination but does not participate, the court​
200200 7.6examiner shall submit a report and, if sufficient information is available, may render an​
201201 7.7opinion on competency and an opinion as to whether the unwillingness to participate resulted​
202202 7.8from a mental illness, cognitive impairment, or other factors.​
203203 7.9 (e) If the court examiner determines the defendant would benefit from services for​
204204 7.10engagement in mental health treatment under section 253B.041 or any other referral to​
205205 7.11social services, the court examiner may recommend referral of the defendant to services​
206206 7.12where available.​
207207 7.13 Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.43, subdivision 3, is amended to read:​
208208 7.14 Subd. 3.Additional examination.If either the prosecutor or defense counsel intends​
209209 7.15to retain an independent examiner, the party shall provide notice to the court and opposing​
210210 7.16counsel no later than ten days after the date of receipt of the court-appointed court examiner's​
211211 7.17report. If an independent examiner is retained, the independent examiner's report shall be​
212212 7.18filed no more than 30 days after the date a party files notice of intent to retain an independent​
213213 7.19examiner, unless extended by the court for good cause.​
214214 7.20 Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.44, subdivision 1, is amended to read:​
215215 7.21 Subdivision 1.Request for hearing.(a) The prosecutor or defense counsel may request​
216216 7.22a hearing on the court-appointed court examiner's competency report by filing a written​
217217 7.23objection no later than ten days after the report is filed.​
218218 7.24 (b) A hearing shall be held as soon as possible but no longer than 30 days after the​
219219 7.25request, unless extended by agreement of the prosecutor and defense counsel, or by the​
220220 7.26court for good cause.​
221221 7.27 (c) If an independent court examiner is retained, the hearing may be continued up to 14​
222222 7.28days after the date the independent court examiner's report is filed. The court may continue​
223223 7.29the hearing for good cause.​
224224 7​Sec. 18.​
225-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 8.1 Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.44, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
225+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 8.1 Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.44, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
226226 8.2 Subd. 2.Competency hearing.(a) The court may admit all relevant and reliable evidence​
227227 8.3at the competency hearing. The court-appointed court examiner is considered the court's​
228228 8.4witness and may be called and questioned by the court, prosecutor, or defense counsel. The​
229229 8.5report of the court-appointed court examiner shall be admitted into evidence without further​
230230 8.6foundation.​
231231 8.7 (b) Defense counsel may testify, subject to the prosecutor's cross-examination, but shall​
232232 8.8not violate attorney-client privilege. Testifying does not automatically disqualify defense​
233233 8.9counsel from continuing to represent the defendant. The court may inquire of defense counsel​
234234 8.10regarding the attorney-client relationship and the defendant's ability to communicate with​
235235 8.11counsel. The court shall not require counsel to divulge communications protected by​
236236 8.12attorney-client privilege, and the prosecutor shall not cross-examine defense counsel​
237237 8.13concerning responses to the court's inquiry.​
238238 8.14 Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.45, subdivision 3, is amended to read:​
239239 8.15 Subd. 3.Dismissal of criminal charge.(a) If the court finds the defendant incompetent,​
240240 8.16and the charge is a misdemeanor other than a targeted misdemeanor, the charge must be​
241241 8.17dismissed.​
242242 8.18 (b) In targeted misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor cases, the charges must be dismissed​
243243 8.1930 days after the date of the finding of incompetence, unless the prosecutor, before the​
244244 8.20expiration of the 30-day period, files a written notice of intent to prosecute when the​
245245 8.21defendant regains attains competency. If a notice has been filed and the charge is a targeted​
246246 8.22misdemeanor, charges must be dismissed within one year after the finding of incompetency.​
247247 8.23If a notice has been filed and the charge is a gross misdemeanor, charges must be dismissed​
248248 8.24within two years after the finding of incompetency.​
249249 8.25 (c) In felony cases, except as provided in paragraph (d), the charges must be dismissed​
250250 8.26three years after the date of the finding of incompetency, unless the prosecutor, before the​
251251 8.27expiration of the three-year period, files a written notice of intent to prosecute when the​
252252 8.28defendant regains attains competency. If a notice has been filed, charges must be dismissed​
253253 8.29within five years after the finding of incompetency or ten years if the maximum sentence​
254254 8.30for the crime with which the defendant is charged is ten years or more.​
255255 8.31 (d) The requirement that felony charges be dismissed under paragraph (c) does not apply​
256256 8.32if:​
257257 8​Sec. 20.​
258-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 9.1 (1) the court orders continuing supervision pursuant to section 611.49, subdivision 3;​
258+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 9.1 (1) the court orders continuing supervision pursuant to section 611.49, subdivision 3;​
259259 9.2or​
260260 9.3 (2) the defendant is charged with a violation of sections 609.185 (murder in the first​
261261 9.4degree); 609.19 (murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder in the third degree); 609.20​
262262 9.5(manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in the second degree); 609.2112​
263263 9.6(criminal vehicular homicide); 609.2114, subdivision 1 (criminal vehicular operation, death​
264264 9.7to an unborn child); 609.2661 (murder of an unborn child in the first degree); 609.2662​
265265 9.8(murder of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.2663 (murder of an unborn child in​
266266 9.9the third degree); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first degree); or 609.2665​
267267 9.10(manslaughter of an unborn child in the second degree); or a crime of violence as defined​
268268 9.11in section 624.712, subdivision 5, except for a violation of chapter 152.​
269269 9.12 (e) Nothing in this subdivision requires dismissal of any charge if the court finds the​
270270 9.13defendant competent and enters an order directing that the criminal proceedings shall resume.​
271271 9.14 Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.46, subdivision 1, is amended to read:​
272272 9.15 Subdivision 1.Order to competency restoration attainment program.(a) If the court​
273273 9.16finds the defendant incompetent and the charges have not been dismissed, the court shall​
274274 9.17order the defendant to participate in a competency restoration program to restore assist the​
275275 9.18defendant's competence defendant in attaining competency. The court may order participation​
276276 9.19in a competency restoration attainment program provided outside of a jail, a jail-based​
277277 9.20competency restoration attainment program, or an alternative program. The court must​
278278 9.21determine the least-restrictive program appropriate to meet the defendant's needs and public​
279279 9.22safety. In making this determination, the court must consult with the forensic navigator and​
280280 9.23consider any recommendations of the court examiner. The court shall not order a defendant​
281281 9.24to participate in a jail-based program or a state-operated treatment program if the highest​
282282 9.25criminal charge is a misdemeanor or targeted misdemeanor.​
283283 9.26 (b) If the court orders the defendant to a locked treatment facility or jail-based program,​
284284 9.27the court must calculate the defendant's custody credit and cannot order the defendant to a​
285285 9.28locked treatment facility or jail-based program for a period that would cause the defendant's​
286286 9.29custody credit to exceed the maximum sentence for the underlying charge.​
287-9.30 (b) (c) The court may only order the defendant to participate in competency restoration
288-9.31at an inpatient or residential treatment program under this section if the head of the treatment
289-9.32program determines that admission to the program is clinically appropriate and consents to
290-9.33the defendant's admission. The court may only order the defendant to participate in
291-9.34competency restoration at a state-operated treatment facility under this section if the
287+9.30 (b) (c) The court may only order placement of the defendant to participate in competency​
288+9.31restoration at an inpatient or residential treatment program under this section if the head of​
289+9.32the treatment program determines that admission to the program is clinically appropriate​
290+9.33and consents to the defendant's admission. The court may only order the defendant to​
291+9.34participate placement in competency restoration at a state-operated treatment facility under​
292292 9​Sec. 21.​
293-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 10.1commissioner of human services or a designee determines that admission of the defendant
294-10.2is clinically appropriate and consents to the defendant's admission. The court may require
295-10.3a certified competency program that qualifies as a locked facility or a state-operated treatment
296-10.4program to notify the court in writing of the basis for refusing consent for admission of the
297-10.5defendant in order to ensure transparency and maintain an accurate record. The court may
298-10.6not require personal appearance of any representative of a certified competency program.
299-10.7The court shall send a written request for notification to the locked facility or state-operated
300-10.8treatment program and the locked facility or state-operated treatment program shall provide
301-10.9a written response to the court within ten days of receipt of the court's request.
302-10.10 (c) (d) If the defendant is confined in jail and has not received competency restoration
303-10.11attainment services within 30 days of the finding of incompetency, the court shall review
304-10.12the case with input from the prosecutor and defense counsel and may:
305-10.13 (1) order the defendant to participate in an appropriate competency restoration attainment
306-10.14program that takes place outside of a jail;
307-10.15 (2) conditionally order a conditional release of the defendant, including with conditions
308-10.16that include but are not limited to conditions a requirement that the defendant participate
309-10.17in a competency restoration attainment program when one becomes available and accessible;
310-10.18 (3) make a determination as to whether the defendant is likely to attain competency in
311-10.19the reasonably foreseeable future and proceed under section 611.49; or
312-10.20 (4) upon a motion, dismiss the charges in the interest of justice.
313-10.21 (d) Upon the order to a competency restoration program or alternative program, (e) The​
314-10.22court may order any hospital, treatment facility, or correctional facility that has provided
315-10.23care or supervision to the a defendant in the previous two years to provide copies of the
316-10.24defendant's medical records to the competency restoration attainment program or alternative
317-10.25program in which the defendant was ordered to participate. This information shall be provided
318-10.26in a consistent and timely manner and pursuant to all applicable laws.
319-10.27 (e) (f) If at any time the defendant refuses to participate in a competency restoration
320-10.28attainment program or an alternative program, the head of the program shall notify the court
321-10.29and any entity responsible for supervision of the defendant.
322-10.30 (f) (g) At any time, the head of the program may discharge the defendant from the
323-10.31program or facility. The head of the program must notify the court, prosecutor, defense
324-10.32counsel, and any entity responsible for the supervision of the defendant prior to any planned
325-10.33discharge. Absent emergency circumstances, this notification shall be made five days prior​
293+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 10.1this section if the commissioner of human services or a designee determines that admission​
294+10.2of the defendant is clinically appropriate and consents to the defendant's admission. The​
295+10.3court may require a certified competency program that qualifies as a locked facility or a​
296+10.4state-operated treatment program to notify the court in writing of the basis for refusing​
297+10.5consent for admission of the defendant in order to ensure transparency and maintain an​
298+10.6accurate record. The court may not require personal appearance of any representative of a​
299+10.7certified competency program. The court shall send a written request for notification to the​
300+10.8locked facility or state-operated treatment program and the locked facility or state-operated​
301+10.9treatment program shall provide a written response to the court within ten days of receipt​
302+10.10of the court's request.
303+10.11 (c) (d) If the defendant is confined in jail and has not received competency restoration
304+10.12attainment services within 30 days of the finding of incompetency, the court shall review
305+10.13the case with input from the prosecutor and defense counsel and may:
306+10.14 (1) order the defendant to participate in an appropriate competency restoration attainment
307+10.15program that takes place outside of a jail;
308+10.16 (2) conditionally order a conditional release of the defendant, including with conditions
309+10.17that include but are not limited to conditions a requirement that the defendant participate
310+10.18in a competency restoration attainment program when one becomes available and accessible;
311+10.19 (3) make a determination as to whether the defendant is likely to attain competency in
312+10.20the reasonably foreseeable future and proceed under section 611.49; or
313+10.21 (4) upon a motion, dismiss the charges in the interest of justice.
314+10.22 (d) Upon the order to a competency restoration program or alternative program, (e) The
315+10.23court may order any hospital, treatment facility, or correctional facility that has provided
316+10.24care or supervision to the a defendant in the previous two years to provide copies of the
317+10.25defendant's medical records to the competency restoration attainment program or alternative
318+10.26program in which the defendant was ordered to participate. This information shall be provided
319+10.27in a consistent and timely manner and pursuant to all applicable laws.
320+10.28 (e) (f) If at any time the defendant refuses to participate in a competency restoration
321+10.29attainment program or an alternative program, the head of the program shall notify the court
322+10.30and any entity responsible for supervision of the defendant.
323+10.31 (f) (g) At any time, the head of the program may discharge the defendant from the
324+10.32program or facility. The head of the program must notify the court, prosecutor, defense
325+10.33counsel, and any entity responsible for the supervision of the defendant prior to any planned
326326 10​Sec. 21.​
327-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 11.1to the discharge if the defendant is not being discharged to jail or a correctional facility.​
328-11.2Upon the receipt of notification of discharge or upon the request of either party in response​
329-11.3to notification of discharge, the court may order that a defendant who is subject to bail or​
330-11.4unmet conditions of release be returned to jail upon being discharged from the program or​
331-11.5facility. If the court orders a defendant returned to jail, the court shall notify the parties and​
332-11.6head of the program at least one day before the defendant's planned discharge, except in​
333-11.7the event of an emergency discharge where one day notice is not possible. The court must​
334-11.8hold a review hearing within seven days of the defendant's return to jail. The forensic​
335-11.9navigator must be given notice of the hearing and be allowed to participate.​
336-11.10 (g) (h) If the defendant is discharged from the program or facility under emergency​
337-11.11circumstances, notification of emergency discharge shall include a description of the​
338-11.12emergency circumstances and may include a request for emergency transportation. The​
339-11.13court shall make a determination on a request for emergency transportation within 24 hours.​
340-11.14Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement agency from transporting a defendant​
341-11.15pursuant to any other authority.​
342-11.16Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.46, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
343-11.17 Subd. 2.Supervision.(a) Upon a finding of incompetency, if the defendant is entitled​
344-11.18to release, the court must determine whether the defendant requires pretrial supervision.​
345-11.19The court must weigh public safety risks against the defendant's interests in remaining free​
346-11.20from supervision while presumed innocent in the criminal proceedings. The court may use​
347-11.21a validated and equitable risk assessment tool to determine whether supervision is necessary.​
348-11.22 (b) If the court determines that the defendant requires pretrial supervision, the court shall​
349-11.23direct the forensic navigator to conduct pretrial supervision and report violations to the​
350-11.24court. The forensic navigator shall be responsible for the supervision of the defendant until​
351-11.25ordered otherwise by the court.​
352-11.26 (c) Upon application by the prosecutor, the forensic navigator, other entity or its designee​
353-11.27assigned to supervise the defendant, or court services alleging that the defendant violated​
354-11.28a condition of release and is a risk to public safety, the court shall follow the procedures​
355-11.29under Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 6. Any hearing on the alleged violation of release​
356-11.30conditions shall be held no more than 15 days after the date of issuance of a summons or​
357-11.31within 72 hours if the defendant is apprehended on a warrant.​
358-11.32 (d) If the court finds a violation, the court may revise the conditions of release and bail​
359-11.33as appropriate pursuant to Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, including but not limited​
327+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 11.1discharge. Absent emergency circumstances, this notification shall be made five days prior​
328+11.2to the discharge if the defendant is not being discharged to jail or a correctional facility.​
329+11.3Upon the receipt of notification of discharge or upon the request of either party in response​
330+11.4to notification of discharge, the court may order that a defendant who is subject to bail or​
331+11.5unmet conditions of release be returned to jail upon being discharged from the program or​
332+11.6facility. If the court orders a defendant returned to jail, the court shall notify the parties and​
333+11.7head of the program at least one day before the defendant's planned discharge, except in​
334+11.8the event of an emergency discharge where one day notice is not possible. The court must​
335+11.9hold a review hearing within seven days of the defendant's return to jail. The forensic​
336+11.10navigator must be given notice of the hearing and be allowed to participate.​
337+11.11 (g) (h) If the defendant is discharged from the program or facility under emergency​
338+11.12circumstances, notification of emergency discharge shall include a description of the​
339+11.13emergency circumstances and may include a request for emergency transportation. The​
340+11.14court shall make a determination on a request for emergency transportation within 24 hours.​
341+11.15Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement agency from transporting a defendant​
342+11.16pursuant to any other authority.​
343+11.17Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.46, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
344+11.18 Subd. 2.Supervision.(a) Upon a finding of incompetency, if the defendant is entitled​
345+11.19to release, the court must determine whether the defendant requires pretrial supervision.​
346+11.20The court must weigh public safety risks against the defendant's interests in remaining free​
347+11.21from supervision while presumed innocent in the criminal proceedings. The court may use​
348+11.22a validated and equitable risk assessment tool to determine whether supervision is necessary.​
349+11.23 (b) If the court determines that the defendant requires pretrial supervision, the court shall​
350+11.24direct the forensic navigator to conduct pretrial supervision and report violations to the​
351+11.25court. The forensic navigator shall be responsible for the supervision of the defendant until​
352+11.26ordered otherwise by the court.​
353+11.27 (c) Upon application by the prosecutor, the forensic navigator, other entity or its designee​
354+11.28assigned to supervise the defendant, or court services alleging that the defendant violated​
355+11.29a condition of release and is a risk to public safety, the court shall follow the procedures​
356+11.30under Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 6. Any hearing on the alleged violation of release​
357+11.31conditions shall be held no more than 15 days after the date of issuance of a summons or​
358+11.32within 72 hours if the defendant is apprehended on a warrant.​
359+11.33 (d) If the court finds a violation, the court may revise the conditions of release and bail​
360+11.34as appropriate pursuant to Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, including but not limited​
360361 11​Sec. 22.​
361-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 12.1to consideration of and must consider the defendant's need for ongoing access to a​
362+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 12.1to consideration of and must consider the defendant's need for ongoing access to a​
362363 12.2competency restoration attainment program or alternative program under this section.​
363364 12.3 (e) The court must review conditions of release and bail on request of any party and may​
364365 12.4amend the conditions of release or make any other reasonable order upon receipt of​
365366 12.5information that the pretrial detention of a defendant has interfered with the defendant​
366367 12.6attaining competency.​
367368 12.7 Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.46, subdivision 3, is amended to read:​
368369 12.8 Subd. 3.Certified Competency restoration attainment programs; procedure.(a) If​
369370 12.9the court orders a defendant to participate in a competency restoration attainment program​
370371 12.10that takes place outside of a jail, or an alternative program that the court has determined is​
371372 12.11providing appropriate competency restoration attainment services to the defendant, the court​
372373 12.12shall specify whether the program is a community-based treatment program or provided in​
373374 12.13a locked treatment facility.​
374375 12.14 (b) If the court finds that the defendant continues to be incompetent at a review hearing​
375376 12.15held after the initial determination of competency, the court must hold a review hearing​
376377 12.16pursuant to section 611.49 and consider any changes to the defendant's conditions of release​
377378 12.17or competency restoration attainment programming to restore the defendant's competency​
378379 12.18in the least restrictive program appropriate.​
379380 12.19 (c) If the court orders the defendant to a locked treatment facility or jail-based program,​
380381 12.20the court must calculate the defendant's custody credit and cannot order the defendant to a​
381382 12.21locked treatment facility or jail-based program for a period that would cause the defendant's​
382383 12.22custody credit to exceed the maximum sentence for the underlying charge.​
383384 12.23Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.46, subdivision 4, is amended to read:​
384385 12.24 Subd. 4.Jail-based competency restoration attainment programs; procedure.(a)​
385386 12.25A defendant is eligible to participate in a jail-based competency restoration attainment​
386387 12.26program when the underlying charge is a gross misdemeanor or felony and either:​
387388 12.27 (1) the defendant has been found incompetent, the defendant has not met the conditions​
388389 12.28of release ordered pursuant to rule 6.02 of Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, including​
389390 12.29posting bail, and either a court-appointed court examiner has recommended jail-based​
390391 12.30competency restoration attainment as the least restrictive setting to meet the person's needs,​
391392 12.31or the court finds that after a reasonable effort by the forensic navigator, there has not been​
392393 12.32consent by another secure setting to the defendant's placement; or​
393394 12​Sec. 24.​
394-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 13.1 (2) the defendant is in custody and is ordered to a certified competency restoration​
395+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 13.1 (2) the defendant is in custody and is ordered to a certified competency restoration​
395396 13.2attainment program that takes place outside of a jail, a jail-based competency restoration​
396397 13.3attainment program is available within a reasonable distance to the county where the​
397398 13.4defendant is being held, and the court ordered a time-limited placement in a jail-based​
398399 13.5program until transfer to a certified competency restoration attainment program that takes​
399400 13.6place outside of a jail.​
400401 13.7 (b) A defendant may not be ordered to participate in a jail-based competency restoration​
401402 13.8attainment program for more than 90 days without a review hearing. If after 90 days of the​
402403 13.9order to a jail-based program the defendant has not attained competency, the court must​
403404 13.10review the case with input from the prosecutor and defense counsel and may:​
404405 13.11 (1) order the defendant to participate in an appropriate certified competency restoration​
405406 13.12attainment program that takes place outside of a locked facility; or​
406407 13.13 (2) determine whether, after a reasonable effort by the forensic navigator, there is consent​
407408 13.14to the defendant's placement by another locked facility. If court determines that a locked​
408409 13.15facility is the least restrictive program appropriate and no appropriate locked facility is​
409410 13.16available, it may order the defendant to the jail-based program for an additional 90 days.​
410411 13.17 (c) Nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the defendant transferred​
411412 13.18to a certified competency restoration attainment program that takes place outside of a jail​
412413 13.19if the court determines that transition is appropriate, or the defendant satisfies the conditions​
413414 13.20of release or bail. Before the defendant is transitioned transferred to a certified competency​
414415 13.21restoration attainment program that takes place outside of a jail or an alternative program,​
415416 13.22the court shall notify the prosecutor and the defense counsel, and the provisions of subdivision​
416417 13.232 shall apply.​
417418 13.24 (d) The court may require a certified competency program that qualifies as a locked​
418419 13.25facility to notify the court in writing of the basis for refusing consent of the defendant in​
419420 13.26order to ensure transparency and maintain an accurate record. The court may not require​
420421 13.27personal appearance of any representative of a certified competency program.​
421422 13.28Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.46, subdivision 5, is amended to read:​
422423 13.29 Subd. 5.Alternative programs; procedure.(a) A defendant is eligible to participate​
423424 13.30in an alternative program if the defendant has been found incompetent, the defendant is​
424425 13.31entitled to release, and a certified competency restoration attainment program outside of a​
425426 13.32jail is not available.​
426427 13​Sec. 25.​
427-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 14.1 (b) As soon as the forensic navigator has reason to believe that no certified competency​
428+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 14.1 (b) As soon as the forensic navigator has reason to believe that no certified competency​
428429 14.2restoration attainment program outside of a jail will be available within a reasonable time,​
429430 14.3the forensic navigator shall determine if there are available alternative programs that are​
430431 14.4likely to assist the defendant in attaining competency. Upon notification by the forensic​
431432 14.5navigator, The court may order the defendant to participate in an appropriate alternative​
432433 14.6program identified by the forensic navigator and must notify the prosecutor and the defense​
433434 14.7counsel of the order.​
434435 14.8 (c) If at any time while the defendant is participating in an alternative program, an​
435436 14.9appropriate certified competency restoration attainment program that takes place outside​
436437 14.10of a jail becomes available, the forensic navigator must notify the court. The court must​
437438 14.11notify the prosecutor and the defense counsel and must order the defendant to participate​
438439 14.12in an appropriate certified competency restoration attainment program, unless the court​
439440 14.13determines that the defendant is receiving appropriate competency restoration attainment​
440441 14.14services in the alternative program. If appropriate and in the public interest, the court may​
441442 14.15order the defendant to participate in the certified competency restoration attainment program​
442443 14.16and an alternative program.​
443444 14.17 (d) At any time, the head of the alternative program or the forensic navigator may notify​
444445 14.18the court that the defendant is receiving appropriate competency restoration attainment​
445446 14.19services in the alternative program, and recommend that remaining in the alternative program​
446447 14.20is in the best interest of the defendant and the defendant's progress in attaining competency.​
447448 14.21The court may order the defendant to continue programming in the alternative program and​
448449 14.22proceed under subdivision 3.​
449450 14.23 (e) If after 90 days of the order to an alternative program the defendant has not attained​
450451 14.24competency and the defendant is not participating in a certified competency restoration​
451452 14.25attainment program, the court must hold a review hearing pursuant to section 611.49.​
452453 14.26Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.46, subdivision 6, is amended to read:​
453454 14.27 Subd. 6.Reporting to the court.(a) The court examiner must provide an updated report​
454455 14.28to the court at least once every six months, unless the court and the parties agree to a longer​
455456 14.29period that is not more than 12 months, as to the defendant's competency and a description​
456457 14.30of the efforts made to restore the defendant to competency.​
457458 14.31 (b) At any time, the head of the program may notify the court and recommend that a​
458459 14.32court examiner provide an updated competency examination and report.​
459460 14​Sec. 26.​
460-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 15.1 (c) The court shall furnish provide copies of the report to the prosecutor, defense counsel,​
461+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 15.1 (c) The court shall furnish provide copies of the report to the prosecutor, defense counsel,​
461462 15.2and the facility or program where the defendant is being served.​
462463 15.3 (d) The report may make recommendations for continued services to ensure continued​
463464 15.4competency. If the defendant is found guilty, these recommendations may be considered​
464465 15.5by the court in imposing a sentence, including any conditions of probation.​
465466 15.6 Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.47, is amended to read:​
466467 15.7 611.47 ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICATION.​
467468 15.8 Subdivision 1.Motion.When a court finds that a defendant is incompetent or any time​
468469 15.9thereafter, upon the motion of the prosecutor or treating medical provider, the court shall​
469470 15.10hear and determine whether the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding the​
470471 15.11administration of neuroleptic medication and, if so, whether the conditions and factors weigh​
471472 15.12in favor of authorizing involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication.​
472473 15.13 Subd. 2.Certification report Reports.(a) In making a determination under this section,​
473474 15.14the court shall consider the report of the court examiner completed pursuant to section​
474-15.15611.43 and any certification report filed by the treating medical practitioner in support of​
475-15.16a motion under this section. The court may request a certification report from the defendant's​
476-15.17treating medical practitioner.​
477-15.18 (a) (b) If the defendant's treating medical practitioner is of the opinion that the defendant​
478-15.19lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, the treating medical​
479-15.20practitioner shall may certify in a report that the lack of capacity exists and which conditions​
480-15.21under subdivision 3 are applicable. The A certification report shall must contain an​
481-15.22assessment of the current mental status of the defendant and the opinion of the treating​
482-15.23medical practitioner that as to whether involuntary neuroleptic medication has become​
483-15.24medically necessary and appropriate under subdivision 3, paragraph (b), clause (1) or (2),​
484-15.25or in the patient's defendant's best medical interest under subdivision 3, paragraph (b), clause​
485-15.26(3). The certification report shall be filed with the court when a motion for a hearing is made​
486-15.27under this section.​
487-15.28 (b) (c) A certification report made pursuant to this section shall include a description of​
488-15.29the neuroleptic medication proposed to be administered to the defendant, if any, and its​
489-15.30likely effects and side effects, including effects on the defendant's condition or behavior​
490-15.31that would affect the defendant's ability to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings​
491-15.32or to assist counsel in the conduct of a defense in a reasonable manner.​
475+15.15611.43 and may request a certification report from the defendant's treating medical​
476+15.16practitioner.​
477+15.17 (a) (b) If the defendant's treating medical practitioner is of the opinion that the defendant​
478+15.18lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, the treating medical​
479+15.19practitioner shall may certify in a report that the lack of capacity exists and which conditions​
480+15.20under subdivision 3 are applicable. The A certification report shall must contain an​
481+15.21assessment of the current mental status of the defendant and the opinion of the treating​
482+15.22medical practitioner that as to whether involuntary neuroleptic medication has become​
483+15.23medically necessary and appropriate under subdivision 3, paragraph (b), clause (1) or (2),​
484+15.24or in the patient's defendant's best medical interest under subdivision 3, paragraph (b), clause​
485+15.25(3). The certification report shall be filed with the court when a motion for a hearing is made​
486+15.26under this section.​
487+15.27 (b) (c) A certification report made pursuant to this section shall include a description of​
488+15.28the neuroleptic medication proposed to be administered to the defendant, if any, and its​
489+15.29likely effects and side effects, including effects on the defendant's condition or behavior​
490+15.30that would affect the defendant's ability to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings​
491+15.31or to assist counsel in the conduct of a defense in a reasonable manner.​
492+15.32 (c) (d) Any defendant subject to an order under subdivision 3 of this section or the state​
493+15.33may request review of that order.​
492494 15​Sec. 27.​
493-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 16.1 (c) (d) Any defendant subject to an order under subdivision 3 of this section or the state​
494-16.2may request review of that order.​
495-16.3 (d) (e) In addition to the court examiner appointed to report to the court on the defendant's​
496-16.4competency to proceed, the court may appoint a court examiner to examine the defendant​
497-16.5and report to the court and parties as to whether the defendant lacks capacity to make​
498-16.6decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic medication. If the patient defendant​
499-16.7refuses to participate in an examination, the court examiner may rely on the patient's​
500-16.8defendant's clinically relevant medical records in reaching an opinion.​
501-16.9 (e) (f) The defendant is entitled to a second court examiner under this section, if requested​
502-16.10by the defendant.​
503-16.11 Subd. 3.Determination.(a) The court shall consider opinions in the reports prepared​
504-16.12under subdivision 2 as applicable to the issue of first determine whether the defendant lacks​
505-16.13capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic medication and shall​
506-16.14proceed under paragraph (b). In making this determination, the court:​
507-16.15 (1) must apply a rebuttable presumption that a defendant has the capacity to make​
508-16.16decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic medication;​
509-16.17 (2) must find that a defendant has the capacity to make decisions regarding the​
510-16.18administration of neuroleptic medication if the defendant:​
511-16.19 (i) has an awareness of the nature of the defendant's situation and the possible​
512-16.20consequences of refusing treatment with neuroleptic medications;​
513-16.21 (ii) has an understanding of treatment with neuroleptic medications and the risks, benefits,​
514-16.22and alternatives; and​
515-16.23 (iii) communicates verbally or nonverbally a clear choice regarding treatment with​
516-16.24neuroleptic medications that is a reasoned one not based on a symptom of the defendant's​
517-16.25mental illness, even though it may not be in the defendant's best interests; and​
518-16.26 (3) must not conclude that a defendant's decision is unreasonable based solely on a​
519-16.27disagreement with the medical practitioner's recommendation.​
520-16.28 (b) If the court determines that the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding​
521-16.29the administration of neuroleptic medication, the court shall hear and determine whether​
522-16.30any of the following is true:​
523-16.31 (1) the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, as​
524-16.32defined in section 253B.092, subdivision 5, the defendant's mental illness requires medical​
495+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 16.1 (d) (e) In addition to the court examiner appointed to report to the court on the defendant's​
496+16.2competency to proceed, the court may appoint a court examiner to examine the defendant​
497+16.3and report to the court and parties as to whether the defendant lacks capacity to make​
498+16.4decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic medication. If the patient defendant​
499+16.5refuses to participate in an examination, the court examiner may rely on the patient's​
500+16.6defendant's clinically relevant medical records in reaching an opinion.​
501+16.7 (e) (f) The defendant is entitled to a second court examiner under this section, if requested​
502+16.8by the defendant.​
503+16.9 Subd. 3.Determination.(a) The court shall consider opinions in the reports prepared​
504+16.10under subdivision 2 as applicable to the issue of first determine whether the defendant lacks​
505+16.11capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic medication and shall​
506+16.12proceed under paragraph (b). In making this determination, the court:​
507+16.13 (1) must apply a rebuttable presumption that a defendant has the capacity to make​
508+16.14decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic medication;​
509+16.15 (2) must find that a defendant has the capacity to make decisions regarding the​
510+16.16administration of neuroleptic medication if the defendant:​
511+16.17 (i) has an awareness of the nature of the defendant's situation and the possible​
512+16.18consequences of refusing treatment with neuroleptic medications;​
513+16.19 (ii) has an understanding of treatment with neuroleptic medications and the risks, benefits,​
514+16.20and alternatives; and​
515+16.21 (iii) communicates verbally or nonverbally a clear choice regarding treatment with​
516+16.22neuroleptic medications that is a reasoned one not based on a symptom of the defendant's​
517+16.23mental illness, even though it may not be in the defendant's best interests; and​
518+16.24 (3) must not conclude that a defendant's decision is unreasonable based solely on a​
519+16.25disagreement with the medical practitioner's recommendation.​
520+16.26 (b) If the court determines that the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding​
521+16.27the administration of neuroleptic medication, the court shall hear and determine whether​
522+16.28any of the following is true:​
523+16.29 (1) the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, as​
524+16.30defined in section 253B.092, subdivision 5, the defendant's mental illness requires medical​
525+16.31treatment with neuroleptic medication, and, if the defendant's mental illness is not treated​
526+16.32with neuroleptic medication, it is probable that serious harm to the physical or mental health​
527+16.33of the patient defendant will result. Probability of serious harm to the physical or mental​
525528 16​Sec. 27.​
526-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 17.1treatment with neuroleptic medication, and, if the defendant's mental illness is not treated​
527-17.2with neuroleptic medication, it is probable that serious harm to the physical or mental health​
528-17.3of the patient defendant will result. Probability of serious harm to the physical or mental​
529-17.4health of the defendant requires evidence that the defendant is presently suffering adverse​
530-17.5effects to the defendant's physical or mental health, or the defendant has previously suffered​
531-17.6these effects as a result of a mental illness and the defendant's condition is substantially​
532-17.7deteriorating or likely to deteriorate without administration of neuroleptic medication. The​
533-17.8fact that a defendant has a diagnosis of a mental illness does not alone establish probability​
534-17.9of serious harm to the physical or mental health of the defendant;​
535-17.10 (2) the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, as​
536-17.11defined in section 253B.092, subdivision 5, neuroleptic medication is medically necessary,​
537-17.12and the defendant is a danger to others, in that the defendant has inflicted, attempted to​
538-17.13inflict, or made a serious threat of inflicting substantial bodily harm on another while in​
539-17.14custody, or the defendant had inflicted, attempted to inflict, or made a serious threat of​
540-17.15inflicting substantial bodily harm on another that resulted in being taken into custody, and​
541-17.16the defendant presents, as a result of mental illness or cognitive impairment, a demonstrated​
542-17.17danger of inflicting substantial bodily harm on others. Demonstrated danger may be based​
543-17.18on an assessment of the defendant's present mental condition, including a consideration of​
544-17.19past behavior of the defendant and other relevant information; or​
545-17.20 (3) the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, as​
546-17.21defined in section 253B.092, subdivision 5, and the defendant does not meet the criteria​
547-17.22under clause (1) or (2), but the state has shown by clear and convincing evidence that:​
548-17.23 (i) the state has charged the defendant with a serious crime against the person or property;​
549-17.24 (ii) involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication is substantially likely to render​
550-17.25the defendant competent to stand trial;​
551-17.26 (iii) the medication is unlikely to have side effects that interfere with the defendant's​
552-17.27ability to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings or to assist counsel in the conduct​
553-17.28of a defense in a reasonable manner;​
554-17.29 (iv) less intrusive treatments are unlikely to have substantially the same results and​
555-17.30involuntary medication is necessary; and​
556-17.31 (v) neuroleptic medication is in the patient's defendant's best medical interest in light of​
557-17.32the patient's defendant's medical condition.​
529+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 17.1health of the defendant requires evidence that the defendant is presently suffering adverse​
530+17.2effects to the defendant's physical or mental health, or the defendant has previously suffered​
531+17.3these effects as a result of a mental illness and the defendant's condition is substantially​
532+17.4deteriorating or likely to deteriorate without administration of neuroleptic medication. The​
533+17.5fact that a defendant has a diagnosis of a mental illness does not alone establish probability​
534+17.6of serious harm to the physical or mental health of the defendant;​
535+17.7 (2) the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, as​
536+17.8defined in section 253B.092, subdivision 5, neuroleptic medication is medically necessary,​
537+17.9and the defendant is a danger to others, in that the defendant has inflicted, attempted to​
538+17.10inflict, or made a serious threat of inflicting substantial bodily harm on another while in​
539+17.11custody, or the defendant had inflicted, attempted to inflict, or made a serious threat of​
540+17.12inflicting substantial bodily harm on another that resulted in being taken into custody, and​
541+17.13the defendant presents, as a result of mental illness or cognitive impairment, a demonstrated​
542+17.14danger of inflicting substantial bodily harm on others. Demonstrated danger may be based​
543+17.15on an assessment of the defendant's present mental condition, including a consideration of​
544+17.16past behavior of the defendant and other relevant information; or​
545+17.17 (3) the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding neuroleptic medication, as​
546+17.18defined in section 253B.092, subdivision 5, and the defendant does not meet the criteria​
547+17.19under clause (1) or (2), but the state has shown by clear and convincing evidence that:​
548+17.20 (i) the state has charged the defendant with a serious crime against the person or property;​
549+17.21 (ii) involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication is substantially likely to render​
550+17.22the defendant competent to stand trial;​
551+17.23 (iii) the medication is unlikely to have side effects that interfere with the defendant's​
552+17.24ability to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings or to assist counsel in the conduct​
553+17.25of a defense in a reasonable manner;​
554+17.26 (iv) less intrusive treatments are unlikely to have substantially the same results and​
555+17.27involuntary medication is necessary; and​
556+17.28 (v) neuroleptic medication is in the patient's defendant's best medical interest in light of​
557+17.29the patient's defendant's medical condition.​
558+17.30 (c) In ruling on a petition under this section, the court shall also take into consideration​
559+17.31any evidence on If the conditions described in paragraph (b), clause (1), (2), or (3), exist,​
560+17.32the court shall determine whether the following factors weigh in favor of authorizing the​
561+17.33involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication:​
558562 17​Sec. 27.​
559-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 18.1 (c) In ruling on a petition under this section, the court shall also take into consideration
560-18.2any evidence on If the conditions described in paragraph (b), clause (1), (2), or (3), exist,
561-18.3the court shall determine whether the following factors weigh in favor of authorizing the
562-18.4involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication:
563-18.5 (1) what the patient defendant would choose to do in the situation if the patient defendant
564-18.6had capacity, including evidence such as a durable power of attorney for health care under
565-18.7chapter 145C;
566-18.8 (2) the defendant's family, community, moral, religious, and social values;
567-18.9 (3) the medical risks, benefits, and alternatives to the proposed treatment;
568-18.10 (4) past efficacy and any extenuating circumstances of past use of neuroleptic
569-18.11medications; and
570-18.12 (5) any other relevant factors.
571-18.13 (d) In determining whether the defendant possesses capacity to consent to neuroleptic
572-18.14medications, the court:​
573-18.15 (1) must apply a rebuttable presumption that a defendant has the capacity to make
574-18.16decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic medication;​
575-18.17 (2) must find that a defendant has the capacity to make decisions regarding the
576-18.18administration of neuroleptic medication if the defendant:
577-18.19 (i) has an awareness of the nature of the defendant's situation and the possible
578-18.20consequences of refusing treatment with neuroleptic medications;
579-18.21 (ii) has an understanding of treatment with neuroleptic medications and the risks, benefits,
580-18.22and alternatives; and
581-18.23 (iii) communicates verbally or nonverbally a clear choice regarding treatment with​
582-18.24neuroleptic medications that is a reasoned one not based on a symptom of the defendant's
583-18.25mental illness, even though it may not be in the defendant's best interests; and​
584-18.26 (3) must not conclude that a defendant's decision is unreasonable based solely on a
585-18.27disagreement with the medical practitioner's recommendation.
586-18.28 (e) (d) If consideration of the evidence presented on the factors in paragraph (c) weighs
587-18.29weigh in favor of authorizing involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication, and the​
588-18.30court finds any of the conditions described in paragraph (b) to be true, the court shall issue
589-18.31an order authorizing involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication to the defendant
590-18.32when and as prescribed by the defendant's medical practitioner, including administration
563+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 18.1 (1) what the patient defendant would choose to do in the situation if the patient defendant
564+18.2had capacity, including evidence such as a durable power of attorney for health care under
565+18.3chapter 145C;
566+18.4 (2) the defendant's family, community, moral, religious, and social values;
567+18.5 (3) the medical risks, benefits, and alternatives to the proposed treatment;
568+18.6 (4) past efficacy and any extenuating circumstances of past use of neuroleptic
569+18.7medications; and
570+18.8 (5) any other relevant factors.
571+18.9 (d) In determining whether the defendant possesses capacity to consent to neuroleptic
572+18.10medications, the court:
573+18.11 (1) must apply a rebuttable presumption that a defendant has the capacity to make
574+18.12decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic medication;
575+18.13 (2) must find that a defendant has the capacity to make decisions regarding the
576+18.14administration of neuroleptic medication if the defendant:​
577+18.15 (i) has an awareness of the nature of the defendant's situation and the possible
578+18.16consequences of refusing treatment with neuroleptic medications;​
579+18.17 (ii) has an understanding of treatment with neuroleptic medications and the risks, benefits,
580+18.18and alternatives; and
581+18.19 (iii) communicates verbally or nonverbally a clear choice regarding treatment with
582+18.20neuroleptic medications that is a reasoned one not based on a symptom of the defendant's
583+18.21mental illness, even though it may not be in the defendant's best interests; and
584+18.22 (3) must not conclude that a defendant's decision is unreasonable based solely on a
585+18.23disagreement with the medical practitioner's recommendation.
586+18.24 (e) (d) If consideration of the evidence presented on the factors in paragraph (c) weighs
587+18.25weigh in favor of authorizing involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication, and the
588+18.26court finds any of the conditions described in paragraph (b) to be true, the court shall issue
589+18.27an order authorizing involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication to the defendant
590+18.28when and as prescribed by the defendant's medical practitioner, including administration
591+18.29by a treatment facility or correctional facility. The court order shall specify which medications
592+18.30are authorized and may limit the maximum dosage of neuroleptic medication that may be​
593+18.31administered. The order shall be valid for no more than one year. An order may be renewed
594+18.32by filing another petition under this section and following the process in this section. The
591595 18​Sec. 27.​
592-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 19.1by a treatment facility or correctional facility. The court order shall specify which medications​
593-19.2are authorized and may limit the maximum dosage of neuroleptic medication that may be​
594-19.3administered. The order shall be valid for no more than one year. An order may be renewed​
595-19.4by filing another petition under this section and following the process in this section. The​
596-19.5order shall terminate no later than the closure of the criminal case in which it is issued. The​
597-19.6court shall not order involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication under paragraph​
598-19.7(b), clause (3), unless the court has first found that the defendant does not meet the criteria​
599-19.8for involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication under paragraph (b), clause (1),​
600-19.9and does not meet the criteria under paragraph (b), clause (2).​
601-19.10 (f) A copy of the order must be given to the defendant, the defendant's attorney, the​
602-19.11county attorney, and the treatment facility or correctional facility where the defendant is​
603-19.12being served. The treatment facility, correctional facility, or treating medical practitioner​
604-19.13may not begin administration of the neuroleptic medication until it notifies the patient​
605-19.14defendant of the court's order authorizing the treatment.​
606-19.15 Subd. 4.Emergency administration.A treating medical practitioner may administer​
607-19.16neuroleptic medication to a defendant who does not have capacity to make a decision​
608-19.17regarding administration of the medication if the defendant is in an emergency situation.​
609-19.18Medication may be administered for so long as the emergency continues to exist, up to 14​
610-19.19days, if the treating medical practitioner determines that the medication is necessary to​
611-19.20prevent serious, immediate physical harm to the patient defendant or to others. If a request​
612-19.21for authorization to administer medication is made to the court within the 14 days, the​
613-19.22treating medical practitioner may continue the medication through the date of the first court​
614-19.23hearing, if the emergency continues to exist. The treating medical practitioner shall document​
615-19.24the emergency in the defendant's medical record in specific behavioral terms.​
616-19.25 Subd. 5.Administration without judicial review.Neuroleptic medications may be​
617-19.26administered without judicial review under this subdivision if:​
618-19.27 (1) the defendant has been prescribed neuroleptic medication prior to admission to a​
619-19.28facility or program, but lacks the present capacity to consent to the administration of that​
620-19.29neuroleptic medication; continued administration of the medication is in the patient's​
621-19.30defendant's best interest; and the defendant does not refuse administration of the medication.​
622-19.31In this situation, the previously prescribed neuroleptic medication may be continued for up​
623-19.32to 14 days while the treating medical practitioner is requesting a court order authorizing​
624-19.33administering neuroleptic medication or an amendment to a current court order authorizing​
625-19.34administration of neuroleptic medication. If the treating medical practitioner requests a court​
626-19.35order under this section within 14 days, the treating medical practitioner may continue​
596+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 19.1order shall terminate no later than the closure of the criminal case in which it is issued. The​
597+19.2court shall not order involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication under paragraph​
598+19.3(b), clause (3), unless the court has first found that the defendant does not meet the criteria​
599+19.4for involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication under paragraph (b), clause (1),​
600+19.5and does not meet the criteria under paragraph (b), clause (2).​
601+19.6 (f) A copy of the order must be given to the defendant, the defendant's attorney, the​
602+19.7county attorney, and the treatment facility or correctional facility where the defendant is​
603+19.8being served. The treatment facility, correctional facility, or treating medical practitioner​
604+19.9may not begin administration of the neuroleptic medication until it notifies the patient​
605+19.10defendant of the court's order authorizing the treatment.​
606+19.11 Subd. 4.Emergency administration.A treating medical practitioner may administer​
607+19.12neuroleptic medication to a defendant who does not have capacity to make a decision​
608+19.13regarding administration of the medication if the defendant is in an emergency situation.​
609+19.14Medication may be administered for so long as the emergency continues to exist, up to 14​
610+19.15days, if the treating medical practitioner determines that the medication is necessary to​
611+19.16prevent serious, immediate physical harm to the patient defendant or to others. If a request​
612+19.17for authorization to administer medication is made to the court within the 14 days, the​
613+19.18treating medical practitioner may continue the medication through the date of the first court​
614+19.19hearing, if the emergency continues to exist. The treating medical practitioner shall document​
615+19.20the emergency in the defendant's medical record in specific behavioral terms.​
616+19.21 Subd. 5.Administration without judicial review.Neuroleptic medications may be​
617+19.22administered without judicial review under this subdivision if:​
618+19.23 (1) the defendant has been prescribed neuroleptic medication prior to admission to a​
619+19.24facility or program, but lacks the present capacity to consent to the administration of that​
620+19.25neuroleptic medication; continued administration of the medication is in the patient's​
621+19.26defendant's best interest; and the defendant does not refuse administration of the medication.​
622+19.27In this situation, the previously prescribed neuroleptic medication may be continued for up​
623+19.28to 14 days while the treating medical practitioner is requesting a court order authorizing​
624+19.29administering neuroleptic medication or an amendment to a current court order authorizing​
625+19.30administration of neuroleptic medication. If the treating medical practitioner requests a court​
626+19.31order under this section within 14 days, the treating medical practitioner may continue​
627+19.32administering the medication to the patient defendant through the hearing date or until the​
628+19.33court otherwise issues an order; or​
627629 19​Sec. 27.​
628-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 20.1administering the medication to the patient defendant through the hearing date or until the​
629-20.2court otherwise issues an order; or​
630-20.3 (2) the defendant does not have the present capacity to consent to the administration of​
631-20.4neuroleptic medication, but prepared a health care power of attorney or a health care directive​
632-20.5under chapter 145C requesting treatment or authorizing an agent or proxy to request​
633-20.6treatment, and the agent or proxy has requested the treatment.​
634-20.7 Subd. 6.Defendants with capacity to make informed decision.If the court finds that​
635-20.8the defendant has the capacity to decide whether to take neuroleptic medication, a facility​
636-20.9or program may not administer medication without the patient's defendant's informed written​
637-20.10consent or without the declaration of an emergency, or until further review by the court.​
638-20.11 Subd. 7.Procedure when patient defendant refuses medication.If physical force is​
639-20.12required to administer the neuroleptic medication, the facility or program may only use​
640-20.13injectable medications. If physical force is needed to administer the medication, medication​
641-20.14may only be administered in a setting where the person's defendant's condition can be​
642-20.15reassessed and medical personnel qualified to administer medication are available, including​
643-20.16in the community or a correctional facility. The facility or program may not use a nasogastric​
644-20.17tube to administer neuroleptic medication involuntarily.​
645-20.18Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.48, is amended to read:​
646-20.19 611.48 REVIEW HEARINGS.​
647-20.20 The prosecutor or defense counsel may apply to the court for a hearing to review the​
648-20.21defendant's competency restoration attainment programming. All parties are entitled to​
649-20.22notice before the hearing. The hearing shall be held no later than 30 days after the date of​
650-20.23the request, unless extended upon agreement of the prosecutor and defense counsel or by​
651-20.24the court for good cause.​
652-20.25Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.49, is amended to read:​
653-20.26 611.49 LIKELIHOOD TO ATTAIN COMPETENCY .​
654-20.27 Subdivision 1.Applicability.(a) The court may hold a hearing on its own initiative or​
655-20.28upon request of either party to determine whether the defendant is likely to attain competency​
656-20.29in the foreseeable future when the most recent court examiner's report states that the defendant​
657-20.30is unlikely to attain competency in the foreseeable future, and either:​
630+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 20.1 (2) the defendant does not have the present capacity to consent to the administration of​
631+20.2neuroleptic medication, but prepared a health care power of attorney or a health care directive​
632+20.3under chapter 145C requesting treatment or authorizing an agent or proxy to request​
633+20.4treatment, and the agent or proxy has requested the treatment.​
634+20.5 Subd. 6.Defendants with capacity to make informed decision.If the court finds that​
635+20.6the defendant has the capacity to decide whether to take neuroleptic medication, a facility​
636+20.7or program may not administer medication without the patient's defendant's informed written​
637+20.8consent or without the declaration of an emergency, or until further review by the court.​
638+20.9 Subd. 7.Procedure when patient defendant refuses medication.If physical force is​
639+20.10required to administer the neuroleptic medication, the facility or program may only use​
640+20.11injectable medications. If physical force is needed to administer the medication, medication​
641+20.12may only be administered in a setting where the person's defendant's condition can be​
642+20.13reassessed and medical personnel qualified to administer medication are available, including​
643+20.14in the community or a correctional facility. The facility or program may not use a nasogastric​
644+20.15tube to administer neuroleptic medication involuntarily.​
645+20.16Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.48, is amended to read:​
646+20.17 611.48 REVIEW HEARINGS.​
647+20.18 The prosecutor or defense counsel may apply to the court for a hearing to review the​
648+20.19defendant's competency restoration attainment programming. All parties are entitled to​
649+20.20notice before the hearing. The hearing shall be held no later than 30 days after the date of​
650+20.21the request, unless extended upon agreement of the prosecutor and defense counsel or by​
651+20.22the court for good cause.​
652+20.23Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.49, is amended to read:​
653+20.24 611.49 LIKELIHOOD TO ATTAIN COMPETENCY .​
654+20.25 Subdivision 1.Applicability.(a) The court may hold a hearing on its own initiative or​
655+20.26upon request of either party to determine whether the defendant is likely to attain competency​
656+20.27in the foreseeable future when the most recent court examiner's report states that the defendant​
657+20.28is unlikely to attain competency in the foreseeable future, and either:​
658+20.29 (1) the defendant has not been restored to competence attained competency after​
659+20.30participating and cooperating with court-ordered competency restoration attainment​
660+20.31programming for at least one year; or​
658661 20​Sec. 29.​
659-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 21.1 (1) the defendant has not been restored to competence attained competency after​
660-21.2participating and cooperating with court-ordered competency restoration attainment​
661-21.3programming for at least one year; or​
662-21.4 (2) the defendant has not received timely competency restoration attainment services​
663-21.5under section 611.46 after one year.​
664-21.6 (b) The court cannot find a defendant unlikely to attain competency based upon a​
665-21.7defendant's refusal to cooperate with or remain at a certified competency program or​
666-21.8cooperate with an examination.​
667-21.9 (c) The parties are entitled to 30 days of notice prior to the hearing and, unless the parties​
668-21.10agree to a longer time period, the court must determine within 30 days after the hearing​
669-21.11whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant will attain competency within​
670-21.12the foreseeable future.​
671-21.13 (d) A party attempting to demonstrate that there is a substantial probability that the​
672-21.14defendant will attain competency within the foreseeable future must prove that probability​
673-21.15by a preponderance of the evidence.​
674-21.16 Subd. 2.Procedure.(a) If the court finds that there is a substantial probability that the​
675-21.17defendant will attain competency within the reasonably foreseeable future, the court shall​
676-21.18find the defendant incompetent and proceed under section 611.46.​
677-21.19 (b) If the court finds that there is not a substantial probability the defendant will attain​
678-21.20competency within the reasonably foreseeable future, the court may not order the defendant​
679-21.21to participate in or continue to participate in a competency restoration attainment program​
680-21.22in a locked treatment facility. The court must release the defendant from any custody holds​
681-21.23pertaining to the underlying criminal case and require the forensic navigator to develop a​
682-21.24bridge plan.​
683-21.25 (c) If the court finds that there is not a substantial probability the defendant will attain​
684-21.26competency within the foreseeable future, the court may issue an order to the designated​
685-21.27agency in the county of financial responsibility or the county where the defendant is present​
686-21.28to conduct a prepetition screening pursuant to section 253B.07.​
687-21.29 (d) If a hearing is held under this subdivision and the criteria pursuant to subdivision 1,​
688-21.30paragraphs (a) and (b) are satisfied, a party attempting to demonstrate that there is a​
689-21.31substantial probability that the defendant will attain competency within the foreseeable​
690-21.32future must prove by a preponderance of the evidence.​
662+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 21.1 (2) the defendant has not received timely competency restoration attainment services​
663+21.2under section 611.46 after one year.​
664+21.3 (b) The court cannot find a defendant unlikely to attain competency based upon a​
665+21.4defendant's refusal to cooperate with or remain at a certified competency program or​
666+21.5cooperate with an examination.​
667+21.6 (c) The parties are entitled to 30 days of notice prior to the hearing and, unless the parties​
668+21.7agree to a longer time period, the court must determine within 30 days after the hearing​
669+21.8whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant will attain competency within​
670+21.9the foreseeable future.​
671+21.10 (d) A party attempting to demonstrate that there is a substantial probability that the​
672+21.11defendant will attain competency within the foreseeable future must prove that probability​
673+21.12by a preponderance of the evidence.​
674+21.13 Subd. 2.Procedure.(a) If the court finds that there is a substantial probability that the​
675+21.14defendant will attain competency within the reasonably foreseeable future, the court shall​
676+21.15find the defendant incompetent and proceed under section 611.46.​
677+21.16 (b) If the court finds that there is not a substantial probability the defendant will attain​
678+21.17competency within the reasonably foreseeable future, the court may not order the defendant​
679+21.18to participate in or continue to participate in a competency restoration attainment program​
680+21.19in a locked treatment facility. The court must release the defendant from any custody holds​
681+21.20pertaining to the underlying criminal case and require the forensic navigator to develop a​
682+21.21bridge plan.​
683+21.22 (c) If the court finds that there is not a substantial probability the defendant will attain​
684+21.23competency within the foreseeable future, the court may issue an order to the designated​
685+21.24agency in the county of financial responsibility or the county where the defendant is present​
686+21.25to conduct a prepetition screening pursuant to section 253B.07.​
687+21.26 (d) If a hearing is held under this subdivision and the criteria pursuant to subdivision 1,​
688+21.27paragraphs (a) and (b) are satisfied, a party attempting to demonstrate that there is a​
689+21.28substantial probability that the defendant will attain competency within the foreseeable​
690+21.29future must prove by a preponderance of the evidence.​
691+21.30 (e) (d) If the court finds that there is not a substantial probability that the defendant will​
692+21.31attain competency within the foreseeable future, the court must dismiss the case unless:​
693+21.32 (1) the person is charged with a violation of section 609.185 (murder in the first degree);​
694+21.33609.19 (murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder in the third degree); 609.20​
691695 21​Sec. 29.​
692-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 22.1 (e) (d) If the court finds that there is not a substantial probability that the defendant will​
693-22.2attain competency within the foreseeable future, the court must dismiss the case unless:​
694-22.3 (1) the person is charged with a violation of section 609.185 (murder in the first degree);​
695-22.4609.19 (murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder in the third degree); 609.20​
696-22.5(manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in the second degree); 609.2112​
697-22.6(criminal vehicular homicide); 609.2114, subdivision 1 (criminal vehicular operation, death​
698-22.7to an unborn child); 609.2661 (murder of an unborn child in the first degree); 609.2662​
699-22.8(murder of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.2663 (murder of an unborn child in​
700-22.9the third degree); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first degree); or 609.2665​
701-22.10(manslaughter of an unborn child in the second degree); or a crime of violence as defined​
702-22.11in section 624.712, subdivision 5, except for a violation of chapter 152; or​
703-22.12 (2) there is a showing of a danger to public safety if the matter is dismissed.​
704-22.13 (f) (e) If the court does not dismiss the charges, the court must order continued supervision​
705-22.14under subdivision 3.​
706-22.15 Subd. 3.Continued supervision.(a) If the court orders the continued supervision of a​
707-22.16defendant, any party may request a hearing on the issue of continued supervision by filing​
708-22.17a notice no more than ten days after the order for continued supervision.​
709-22.18 (b) When continued supervision is ordered, the court must identify the supervisory​
710-22.19agency responsible for the supervision of the defendant, including but not limited to directing​
711-22.20and may identify a forensic navigator as the responsible entity.​
712-22.21 (c) Notwithstanding the reporting requirements of section 611.46, subdivision 6, the​
713-22.22court examiner must provide an updated report to the court one year after the initial order​
714-22.23for continued supervision as to the defendant's competency and a description of the efforts​
715-22.24made to restore assist the defendant to in attaining competency. The court shall hold a review​
716-22.25hearing within 30 days of receipt of the report.​
717-22.26 (d) If continued supervision is ordered at the review hearing under paragraph (c), the​
718-22.27court must set a date for a review hearing no later than two years after the most recent order​
719-22.28for continuing supervision. The court must order review of the defendant's status, including​
720-22.29an updated competency examination and report by the court examiner. The court examiner​
721-22.30must submit the updated report to the court. At the review hearing, the court must determine​
722-22.31if the defendant has attained competency, whether there is a substantial probability that the​
723-22.32defendant will attain competency within the foreseeable future, and whether the absence of​
724-22.33continuing supervision of the defendant is a danger to public safety. Notwithstanding​
696+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 22.1(manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in the second degree); 609.2112​
697+22.2(criminal vehicular homicide); 609.2114, subdivision 1 (criminal vehicular operation, death​
698+22.3to an unborn child); 609.2661 (murder of an unborn child in the first degree); 609.2662​
699+22.4(murder of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.2663 (murder of an unborn child in​
700+22.5the third degree); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first degree); or 609.2665​
701+22.6(manslaughter of an unborn child in the second degree); or a crime of violence as defined​
702+22.7in section 624.712, subdivision 5, except for a violation of chapter 152; or​
703+22.8 (2) there is a showing of a danger to public safety if the matter is dismissed.​
704+22.9 (f) (e) If the court does not dismiss the charges, the court must order continued supervision​
705+22.10under subdivision 3.​
706+22.11 Subd. 3.Continued supervision.(a) If the court orders the continued supervision of a​
707+22.12defendant, any party may request a hearing on the issue of continued supervision by filing​
708+22.13a notice no more than ten days after the order for continued supervision.​
709+22.14 (b) When continued supervision is ordered, the court must identify the supervisory​
710+22.15agency responsible for the supervision of the defendant, including but not limited to directing​
711+22.16and may identify a forensic navigator as the responsible entity.​
712+22.17 (c) Notwithstanding the reporting requirements of section 611.46, subdivision 6, the​
713+22.18court examiner must provide an updated report to the court one year after the initial order​
714+22.19for continued supervision as to the defendant's competency and a description of the efforts​
715+22.20made to restore assist the defendant to in attaining competency. The court shall hold a review​
716+22.21hearing within 30 days of receipt of the report.​
717+22.22 (d) If continued supervision is ordered at the review hearing under paragraph (c), the​
718+22.23court must set a date for a review hearing no later than two years after the most recent order​
719+22.24for continuing supervision. The court must order review of the defendant's status, including​
720+22.25an updated competency examination and report by the court examiner. The court examiner​
721+22.26must submit the updated report to the court. At the review hearing, the court must determine​
722+22.27if the defendant has attained competency, whether there is a substantial probability that the​
723+22.28defendant will attain competency within the foreseeable future, and whether the absence of​
724+22.29continuing supervision of the defendant is a danger to public safety. Notwithstanding​
725+22.30subdivision 2, paragraph (e) (d), the court may hear any motions to dismiss pursuant to the​
726+22.31interest of justice at the review hearing.​
727+22.32 (e) Continued supervision of a defendant in cases where the most serious charge is a​
728+22.33targeted misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor is subject to the limitations established in​
729+22.34section 611.45, subdivision 3, paragraph (b).​
725730 22​Sec. 29.​
726-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 23.1subdivision 2, paragraph (e) (d), the court may hear any motions to dismiss pursuant to the​
727-23.2interest of justice at the review hearing.​
728-23.3 (e) Continued supervision of a defendant in cases where the most serious charge is a​
729-23.4targeted misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor is subject to the limitations established in​
730-23.5section 611.45, subdivision 3, paragraph (b).​
731-23.6 (e) (f) The court may not order continued supervision of a defendant charged with a​
732-23.7felony for more than ten years unless the defendant is charged with a violation of section​
733-23.8609.185 (murder in the first degree); 609.19 (murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder​
734-23.9in the third degree); 609.20 (manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in​
735-23.10the second degree); 609.2112 (criminal vehicular homicide); 609.2114, subdivision 1​
736-23.11(criminal vehicular operation, death to an unborn child); 609.2661 (murder of an unborn​
737-23.12child in the first degree); 609.2662 (murder of an unborn child in the second degree);​
738-23.13609.2663 (murder of an unborn child in the third degree); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an​
739-23.14unborn child in the first degree); or 609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the second​
740-23.15degree); or a crime of violence as defined in section 624.712, subdivision 5, except for a​
741-23.16violation of chapter 152.​
742-23.17 (f) (g) At any time, the head of the program may discharge the defendant from the​
743-23.18program or facility. The head of the program must notify the court, prosecutor, defense​
744-23.19counsel, forensic navigator, and any entity responsible for the supervision of the defendant​
745-23.20prior to any planned discharge. Absent emergency circumstances, this notification shall be​
746-23.21made five days prior to the discharge. If the defendant is discharged from the program or​
747-23.22facility under emergency circumstances, notification of emergency discharge shall include​
748-23.23a description of the emergency circumstances and may include a request for emergency​
749-23.24transportation. The court shall make a determination on a request for emergency​
750-23.25transportation within 24 hours. Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement agency​
751-23.26from transporting a defendant pursuant to any other authority.​
752-23.27 (g) (h) The court may provide, partner, or contract for pretrial supervision services or​
753-23.28continued supervision if the defendant is found incompetent and unlikely to attain competency​
754-23.29in the foreseeable future.​
755-23​Sec. 29.​
756-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 24.1 Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.51, is amended to read:​
757-24.2 611.51 CREDIT FOR CONFINEMENT .​
758-24.3 If the defendant is convicted, any time spent confined in a secured secure setting while​
759-24.4being assessed and restored to or receiving competency attainment services must be credited​
760-24.5as time served.​
761-24.6 Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.55, is amended to read:​
762-24.7 611.55 FORENSIC NAVIGATOR SERVICES.​
763-24.8 Subdivision 1.Definition.As used in this section, "board" means the State Competency​
764-24.9Restoration Attainment Board established in section 611.56.​
765-24.10 Subd. 2.Availability of forensic navigator services.The board must provide or contract​
766-24.11for enough forensic navigator services to meet the needs of adult defendants in each judicial​
767-24.12district who are found incompetent to proceed.​
768-24.13 Subd. 3.Duties.(a) Forensic navigators shall assist and supervise defendants when​
769-24.14appointed to do so by a court. Forensic navigators shall be impartial in all legal matters​
770-24.15relating to the criminal case. Nothing shall be construed to permit the forensic navigator to​
771-24.16provide legal counsel as a representative of the court, prosecutor, or defense counsel. Forensic​
772-24.17navigators shall be required to report compliance and noncompliance with pretrial supervision​
773-24.18and any orders of the court.​
774-24.19 (b) Forensic navigators shall provide services to assist defendants with mental illnesses​
775-24.20and cognitive impairments. Services may include, but are not limited to:​
776-24.21 (1) developing bridge plans;​
777-24.22 (2) assisting defendants in participating in court-ordered examinations and hearings;​
778-24.23 (3) coordinating timely placement in court-ordered competency restoration attainment​
779-24.24programs;​
780-24.25 (4) providing competency restoration attainment education;​
781-24.26 (5) reporting to the court on the progress of defendants found incompetent to stand trial;​
782-24.27 (6) providing coordinating services to help defendants access needed mental health​
783-24.28services, medical care, stable housing and housing assistance, financial assistance, social​
784-24.29services, transportation, precharge and pretrial diversion, and other necessary services​
785-24.30provided by other programs and community service providers;​
731+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 23.1 (e) (f) The court may not order continued supervision of a defendant charged with a​
732+23.2felony for more than ten years unless the defendant is charged with a violation of section​
733+23.3609.185 (murder in the first degree); 609.19 (murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder​
734+23.4in the third degree); 609.20 (manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in​
735+23.5the second degree); 609.2112 (criminal vehicular homicide); 609.2114, subdivision 1​
736+23.6(criminal vehicular operation, death to an unborn child); 609.2661 (murder of an unborn​
737+23.7child in the first degree); 609.2662 (murder of an unborn child in the second degree);​
738+23.8609.2663 (murder of an unborn child in the third degree); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an​
739+23.9unborn child in the first degree); or 609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the second​
740+23.10degree); or a crime of violence as defined in section 624.712, subdivision 5, except for a​
741+23.11violation of chapter 152.​
742+23.12 (f) (g) At any time, the head of the program may discharge the defendant from the​
743+23.13program or facility. The head of the program must notify the court, prosecutor, defense​
744+23.14counsel, forensic navigator, and any entity responsible for the supervision of the defendant​
745+23.15prior to any planned discharge. Absent emergency circumstances, this notification shall be​
746+23.16made five days prior to the discharge. If the defendant is discharged from the program or​
747+23.17facility under emergency circumstances, notification of emergency discharge shall include​
748+23.18a description of the emergency circumstances and may include a request for emergency​
749+23.19transportation. The court shall make a determination on a request for emergency​
750+23.20transportation within 24 hours. Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement agency​
751+23.21from transporting a defendant pursuant to any other authority.​
752+23.22 (g) (h) The court may provide, partner, or contract for pretrial supervision services or​
753+23.23continued supervision if the defendant is found incompetent and unlikely to attain competency​
754+23.24in the foreseeable future.​
755+23.25Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.51, is amended to read:​
756+23.26 611.51 CREDIT FOR CONFINEMENT .​
757+23.27 If the defendant is convicted, any time spent confined in a secured secure setting while​
758+23.28being assessed and restored to or receiving competency attainment services must be credited​
759+23.29as time served.​
760+23.30Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.55, is amended to read:​
761+23.31 611.55 FORENSIC NAVIGATOR SERVICES.​
762+23.32 Subdivision 1.Definition.As used in this section, "board" means the State Competency​
763+23.33Restoration Attainment Board established in section 611.56.​
764+23​Sec. 31.​
765+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 24.1 Subd. 2.Availability of forensic navigator services.The board must provide or contract​
766+24.2for enough forensic navigator services to meet the needs of adult defendants in each judicial​
767+24.3district who are found incompetent to proceed.​
768+24.4 Subd. 3.Duties.(a) Forensic navigators shall assist and supervise defendants when​
769+24.5appointed to do so by a court. Forensic navigators shall be impartial in all legal matters​
770+24.6relating to the criminal case. Nothing shall be construed to permit the forensic navigator to​
771+24.7provide legal counsel as a representative of the court, prosecutor, or defense counsel. Forensic​
772+24.8navigators shall be required to report compliance and noncompliance with pretrial supervision​
773+24.9and any orders of the court.​
774+24.10 (b) Forensic navigators shall provide services to assist defendants with mental illnesses​
775+24.11and cognitive impairments. Services may include, but are not limited to:​
776+24.12 (1) developing bridge plans;​
777+24.13 (2) assisting defendants in participating in court-ordered examinations and hearings;​
778+24.14 (3) coordinating timely placement in court-ordered competency restoration attainment​
779+24.15programs;​
780+24.16 (4) providing competency restoration attainment education;​
781+24.17 (5) reporting to the court on the progress of defendants found incompetent to stand trial;​
782+24.18 (6) providing coordinating services to help defendants access needed mental health​
783+24.19services, medical care, stable housing and housing assistance, financial assistance, social​
784+24.20services, transportation, precharge and pretrial diversion, and other necessary services​
785+24.21provided by other programs and community service providers;​
786+24.22 (7) communicating with and offering supportive resources to defendants and family​
787+24.23members of defendants; and​
788+24.24 (8) providing consultation and education to court officials on emerging issues and​
789+24.25innovations in serving defendants with mental illnesses in the court system.​
790+24.26 (c) When ordered to supervise a defendant, a forensic navigator shall report to the court​
791+24.27on a defendant's compliance or noncompliance with conditions of pretrial supervision and​
792+24.28any order of the court.​
793+24.29 (c) (d) If a defendant's charges are dismissed, the appointed forensic navigator may​
794+24.30continue assertive outreach with the individual for up to 90 days to assist in attaining stability​
795+24.31in the community.​
786796 24​Sec. 31.​
787-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 25.1 (7) communicating with and offering supportive resources to defendants and family​
788-25.2members of defendants; and​
789-25.3 (8) providing consultation and education to court officials on emerging issues and​
790-25.4innovations in serving defendants with mental illnesses in the court system.​
791-25.5 (c) When ordered to supervise a defendant, a forensic navigator shall report to the court​
792-25.6on a defendant's compliance or noncompliance with conditions of pretrial supervision and​
793-25.7any order of the court.​
794-25.8 (c) (d) If a defendant's charges are dismissed, the appointed forensic navigator may​
795-25.9continue assertive outreach with the individual for up to 90 days to assist in attaining stability​
796-25.10in the community.​
797-25.11 Subd. 4.Bridge plans.(a) The forensic navigator must prepare bridge plans A forensic​
798-25.12navigator must prepare a bridge plan with the defendant and submit them the bridge plan​
799-25.13to the court. Bridge plans must be submitted before the time the court makes a competency​
800-25.14finding pursuant to section 611.45. The A bridge plan must include:​
801-25.15 (1) a confirmed housing address the defendant will use upon release, including but not​
802-25.16limited to emergency shelters;​
803-25.17 (2) if possible, the dates, times, locations, and contact information for any appointments​
804-25.18made to further coordinate support and assistance for the defendant in the community,​
805-25.19including but not limited to mental health and substance use disorder treatment, or a list of​
806-25.20referrals to services; and​
807-25.21 (3) any other referrals, resources, or recommendations the forensic navigator or court​
808-25.22deems necessary.​
809-25.23 (b) Bridge plans and any supporting records or other data submitted with those plans​
810-25.24are not accessible to the public.​
811-25.25Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.56, is amended to read:​
812-25.26 611.56 STATE COMPETENCY RESTORATION ATTAINMENT BOARD.​
813-25.27 Subdivision 1.Establishment; membership.(a) The State Competency Restoration​
814-25.28Attainment Board is established in the judicial branch. The board is not subject to the​
815-25.29administrative control of the judiciary. The board shall consist of seven members, including:​
816-25.30 (1) three members appointed by the supreme court, at least one of whom must be a​
817-25.31defense attorney, one a county attorney, and one public member; and​
797+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 25.1 Subd. 4.Bridge plans.(a) The Forensic navigator navigators must prepare bridge plans​
798+25.2to assist with a stable transition back into the community. A forensic navigator must prepare​
799+25.3a bridge plan with the defendant and submit them the bridge plan to the court. Bridge plans​
800+25.4must be submitted before the time the court makes a competency finding pursuant to section​
801+25.5611.45. The A bridge plan must include:​
802+25.6 (1) a confirmed housing address the defendant will use upon release, including but not​
803+25.7limited to emergency shelters;​
804+25.8 (2) if possible, the dates, times, locations, and contact information for any appointments​
805+25.9made to further coordinate support and assistance for the defendant in the community,​
806+25.10including but not limited to mental health and substance use disorder treatment, or a list of​
807+25.11referrals to services; and​
808+25.12 (3) any other referrals, resources, or recommendations the forensic navigator or court​
809+25.13deems necessary.​
810+25.14 (b) Bridge plans and any supporting records or other data submitted with those plans​
811+25.15are not accessible to the public.​
812+25.16Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.56, is amended to read:​
813+25.17 611.56 STATE COMPETENCY RESTORATION ATTAINMENT BOARD.​
814+25.18 Subdivision 1.Establishment; membership.(a) The State Competency Restoration​
815+25.19Attainment Board is established in the judicial branch. The board is not subject to the​
816+25.20administrative control of the judiciary. The board shall consist of seven members, including:​
817+25.21 (1) three members appointed by the supreme court, at least one of whom must be a​
818+25.22defense attorney, one a county attorney, and one public member; and​
819+25.23 (2) four members appointed by the governor, at least one of whom must be a mental​
820+25.24health professional with experience in competency restoration attainment.​
821+25.25 (b) The appointing authorities may not appoint an active judge to be a member of the​
822+25.26board, but may appoint a retired judge.​
823+25.27 (c) All members must demonstrate an interest in maintaining a high quality, independent​
824+25.28forensic navigator program and a thorough process for certification of competency restoration​
825+25.29attainment programs. Members shall be familiar with the Minnesota Rules of Criminal​
826+25.30Procedure, particularly rule 20; chapter 253B; and sections 611.40 to 611.59. Following​
827+25.31the initial terms of appointment, at least one member appointed by the supreme court must​
828+25.32have previous experience working as a forensic navigator. At least three members of the​
818829 25​Sec. 32.​
819-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 26.1 (2) four members appointed by the governor, at least one of whom must be a mental
820-26.2health professional with experience in competency restoration attainment.
821-26.3 (b) The appointing authorities may not appoint an active judge to be a member of the
822-26.4board, but may appoint a retired judge.
823-26.5 (c) All members must demonstrate an interest in maintaining a high quality, independent​
824-26.6forensic navigator program and a thorough process for certification of competency restoration
825-26.7attainment programs. Members shall be familiar with the Minnesota Rules of Criminal
826-26.8Procedure, particularly rule 20; chapter 253B; and sections 611.40 to 611.59. Following
827-26.9the initial terms of appointment, at least one member appointed by the supreme court must
828-26.10have previous experience working as a forensic navigator. At least three members of the
829-26.11board shall live outside the First, Second, Fourth, and Tenth Judicial Districts. The terms,
830-26.12compensation, and removal of members shall be as provided in section 15.0575. The members
831-26.13shall elect the chair from among the membership for a term of two years.
832-26.14 Subd. 2.Duties and responsibilities.(a) The board shall create and administer a
833-26.15statewide, independent competency restoration attainment system that certifies competency
834-26.16restoration attainment programs and uses forensic navigators to promote prevention and
835-26.17diversion of people with mental illnesses and cognitive impairments from entering the legal
836-26.18system, support defendants with mental illness and cognitive impairments, support defendants
837-26.19in the competency process, and assist courts and partners in coordinating competency
838-26.20restoration attainment services.​
839-26.21 (b) The board shall:​
840-26.22 (1) approve and recommend to the legislature a budget for the board and the forensic
841-26.23navigator program;
842-26.24 (2) establish procedures for distribution of funding under this section to the forensic
843-26.25navigator program;​
844-26.26 (3) establish forensic navigator standards, administrative policies, procedures, and rules
845-26.27consistent with statute, rules of court, and laws that affect a forensic navigator's work;
846-26.28 (4) establish certification requirements for competency restoration attainment programs;
847-26.29and
848-26.30 (5) carry out the programs under sections 611.57, 611.58, and 611.59.
849-26.31 (c) The board may:​
830+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 26.1board shall live outside the First, Second, Fourth, and Tenth Judicial Districts. The terms,
831+26.2compensation, and removal of members shall be as provided in section 15.0575. The members
832+26.3shall elect the chair from among the membership for a term of two years.
833+26.4 Subd. 2.Duties and responsibilities.(a) The board shall create and administer a​
834+26.5statewide, independent competency restoration attainment system that certifies competency
835+26.6restoration attainment programs and uses forensic navigators to promote prevention and
836+26.7diversion of people with mental illnesses and cognitive impairments from entering the legal
837+26.8system, support defendants with mental illness and cognitive impairments, support defendants
838+26.9in the competency process, and assist courts and partners in coordinating competency
839+26.10restoration attainment services.​
840+26.11 (b) The board shall:
841+26.12 (1) approve and recommend to the legislature a budget for the board and the forensic
842+26.13navigator program;
843+26.14 (2) establish procedures for distribution of funding under this section to the forensic
844+26.15navigator program;
845+26.16 (3) establish forensic navigator standards, administrative policies, procedures, and rules
846+26.17consistent with statute, rules of court, and laws that affect a forensic navigator's work;
847+26.18 (4) establish certification requirements for competency restoration attainment programs;
848+26.19and
849+26.20 (5) carry out the programs under sections 611.57, 611.58, and 611.59.​
850+26.21 (c) The board may:​
851+26.22 (1) adopt standards, policies, or procedures necessary to ensure quality assistance for​
852+26.23defendants found incompetent to stand trial and charged with a felony, gross misdemeanor,
853+26.24or targeted misdemeanor, or for defendants found incompetent to stand trial who have
854+26.25recurring incidents;​
855+26.26 (2) establish district forensic navigator offices as provided in subdivision 4; and​
856+26.27 (3) propose statutory changes to the legislature and rule changes to the supreme court
857+26.28that would facilitate the effective operation of the forensic navigator program.
858+26.29 Subd. 3.Administrator.The board shall appoint a program administrator who serves
859+26.30at the pleasure of the board. The program administrator shall attend all meetings of the board
860+26.31and the Certification Advisory Committee, but may not vote, and shall:​
850861 26​Sec. 32.​
851-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 27.1 (1) adopt standards, policies, or procedures necessary to ensure quality assistance for
852-27.2defendants found incompetent to stand trial and charged with a felony, gross misdemeanor,
853-27.3or targeted misdemeanor, or for defendants found incompetent to stand trial who have
854-27.4recurring incidents;
855-27.5 (2) establish district forensic navigator offices as provided in subdivision 4; and
856-27.6 (3) propose statutory changes to the legislature and rule changes to the supreme court
857-27.7that would facilitate the effective operation of the forensic navigator program.
858-27.8 Subd. 3.Administrator.The board shall appoint a program administrator who serves
859-27.9at the pleasure of the board. The program administrator shall attend all meetings of the board
860-27.10and the Certification Advisory Committee, but may not vote, and shall:
861-27.11 (1) carry out all administrative functions necessary for the efficient and effective operation
862-27.12of the board and the program, including but not limited to hiring, supervising, and disciplining
863-27.13program staff and forensic navigators;
864-27.14 (2) implement, as necessary, resolutions, standards, rules, regulations, and policies of
865-27.15the board;
866-27.16 (3) keep the board fully advised as to its financial condition, and prepare and submit to
867-27.17the board the annual program and budget and other financial information as requested by
868-27.18the board;
869-27.19 (4) recommend to the board the adoption of rules and regulations necessary for the
870-27.20efficient operation of the board and the program; and​
871-27.21 (5) perform other duties prescribed by the board.​
872-27.22 Subd. 4.District offices.The board may establish district forensic navigator offices in
873-27.23counties, judicial districts, or other areas where the number of defendants receiving
874-27.24competency restoration attainment services requires more than one full-time forensic
875-27.25navigator and establishment of an office is fiscally responsible and in the best interest of
876-27.26defendants found to be incompetent.​
877-27.27 Subd. 5.Administration.The board may contract with the Office of State Court
878-27.28Administrator for administrative support services for the fiscal years following fiscal year
879-27.292022.
880-27.30 Subd. 6.Fees and costs; civil actions on contested case.Sections 15.039 and 15.471
881-27.31to 15.474 apply to the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board.
882-27​Sec. 32.​
883-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​ 28.1 Subd. 7.Access to records.Access to records of the board is subject to the Rules of
884-28.2Public Access for Records of the Judicial Branch. The board may propose amendments for
885-28.3supreme court consideration.
886-28.4 Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.57, is amended to read:
887-28.5 611.57 CERTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
888-28.6 Subdivision 1.Establishment.The Certification Advisory Committee is established to
889-28.7provide the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board with advice and expertise
890-28.8related to the certification of competency restoration attainment programs, including
891-28.9jail-based programs.
892-28.10 Subd. 2.Membership.(a) The Certification Advisory Committee consists of the​
893-28.11following members:
894-28.12 (1) a mental health professional, as defined in section 245I.02, subdivision 27, with
895-28.13community behavioral health experience, appointed by the governor;​
896-28.14 (2) a board-certified forensic psychiatrist with experience in competency evaluations,
897-28.15providing competency restoration attainment services, or both, appointed by the governor;
898-28.16 (3) a board-certified forensic psychologist with experience in competency evaluations,
899-28.17providing competency restoration attainment services, or both, appointed by the governor;
900-28.18 (4) the president of the Minnesota Corrections Association or a designee;
901-28.19 (5) the direct care and treatment deputy commissioner or a designee;
902-28.20 (6) the president of the Minnesota Association of County Social Service Administrators
903-28.21or a designee;
904-28.22 (7) the president of the Minnesota Association of Community Mental Health Providers
905-28.23or a designee;
906-28.24 (8) the president of the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association or a designee; and
907-28.25 (9) the executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness Minnesota or a
908-28.26designee.
909-28.27 (b) Members of the advisory committee serve without compensation and at the pleasure
910-28.28of the appointing authority. Vacancies shall be filled by the appointing authority consistent
911-28.29with the qualifications of the vacating member required by this subdivision.
912-28.30 Subd. 3.Meetings.At its first meeting, the advisory committee shall elect a chair and
913-28.31may elect a vice-chair. The advisory committee shall meet at least monthly or upon the call
862+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 27.1 (1) carry out all administrative functions necessary for the efficient and effective operation
863+27.2of the board and the program, including but not limited to hiring, supervising, and disciplining
864+27.3program staff and forensic navigators;
865+27.4 (2) implement, as necessary, resolutions, standards, rules, regulations, and policies of
866+27.5the board;​
867+27.6 (3) keep the board fully advised as to its financial condition, and prepare and submit to​
868+27.7the board the annual program and budget and other financial information as requested by
869+27.8the board;
870+27.9 (4) recommend to the board the adoption of rules and regulations necessary for the​
871+27.10efficient operation of the board and the program; and
872+27.11 (5) perform other duties prescribed by the board.
873+27.12 Subd. 4.District offices.The board may establish district forensic navigator offices in
874+27.13counties, judicial districts, or other areas where the number of defendants receiving
875+27.14competency restoration attainment services requires more than one full-time forensic
876+27.15navigator and establishment of an office is fiscally responsible and in the best interest of
877+27.16defendants found to be incompetent.
878+27.17 Subd. 5.Administration.The board may contract with the Office of State Court
879+27.18Administrator for administrative support services for the fiscal years following fiscal year
880+27.192022.
881+27.20 Subd. 6.Fees and costs; civil actions on contested case.Sections 15.039 and 15.471
882+27.21to 15.474 apply to the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board.​
883+27.22 Subd. 7.Access to records.Access to records of the board is subject to the Rules of
884+27.23Public Access for Records of the Judicial Branch. The board may propose amendments for
885+27.24supreme court consideration.
886+27.25Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.57, is amended to read:
887+27.26 611.57 CERTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.​
888+27.27 Subdivision 1.Establishment.The Certification Advisory Committee is established to
889+27.28provide the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board with advice and expertise
890+27.29related to the certification of competency restoration attainment programs, including
891+27.30jail-based programs.​
892+27.31 Subd. 2.Membership.(a) The Certification Advisory Committee consists of the
893+27.32following members:
894+27Sec. 33.​
895+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 28.1 (1) a mental health professional, as defined in section 245I.02, subdivision 27, with
896+28.2community behavioral health experience, appointed by the governor;
897+28.3 (2) a board-certified forensic psychiatrist with experience in competency evaluations,​
898+28.4providing competency restoration attainment services, or both, appointed by the governor;
899+28.5 (3) a board-certified forensic psychologist with experience in competency evaluations,
900+28.6providing competency restoration attainment services, or both, appointed by the governor;
901+28.7 (4) the president of the Minnesota Corrections Association or a designee;
902+28.8 (5) the direct care and treatment deputy commissioner or a designee;
903+28.9 (6) the president of the Minnesota Association of County Social Service Administrators
904+28.10or a designee;
905+28.11 (7) the president of the Minnesota Association of Community Mental Health Providers
906+28.12or a designee;​
907+28.13 (8) the president of the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association or a designee; and
908+28.14 (9) the executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness Minnesota or a
909+28.15designee.
910+28.16 (b) Members of the advisory committee serve without compensation and at the pleasure
911+28.17of the appointing authority. Vacancies shall be filled by the appointing authority consistent
912+28.18with the qualifications of the vacating member required by this subdivision.
913+28.19 Subd. 3.Meetings.At its first meeting, the advisory committee shall elect a chair and
914+28.20may elect a vice-chair. The advisory committee shall meet at least monthly or upon the call
915+28.21the chair. The advisory committee shall meet sufficiently enough to accomplish the tasks
916+28.22identified in this section.
917+28.23 Subd. 4.Duties.The Certification Advisory Committee shall consult with the Department
918+28.24of Human Services, the Department of Health, and the Department of Corrections; make
919+28.25recommendations to the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board regarding
920+28.26competency restoration attainment curriculum, certification requirements for competency
921+28.27restoration attainment programs including jail-based programs, and certification of individuals
922+28.28to provide competency restoration attainment services; and provide information and
923+28.29recommendations on other issues relevant to competency restoration attainment as requested
924+28.30by the board.
914925 28​Sec. 33.​
915-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 29.1the chair. The advisory committee shall meet sufficiently enough to accomplish the tasks​
916-29.2identified in this section.​
917-29.3 Subd. 4.Duties.The Certification Advisory Committee shall consult with the Department​
918-29.4of Human Services, the Department of Health, and the Department of Corrections; make​
919-29.5recommendations to the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board regarding​
920-29.6competency restoration attainment curriculum, certification requirements for competency​
921-29.7restoration attainment programs including jail-based programs, and certification of individuals​
922-29.8to provide competency restoration attainment services; and provide information and​
923-29.9recommendations on other issues relevant to competency restoration attainment as requested​
924-29.10by the board.​
925-29.11Sec. 34. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.58, is amended to read:​
926-29.12 611.58 COMPETENCY RESTORATION ATTAINMENT CURRICULUM AND​
927-29.13CERTIFICATION.​
928-29.14 Subdivision 1.Curriculum.(a) By January 1, 2023, the board must recommend a​
929-29.15competency restoration attainment curriculum to educate and assist defendants found​
930-29.16incompetent in attaining the ability to:​
931-29.17 (1) rationally consult with counsel;​
932-29.18 (2) understand the proceedings; and​
933-29.19 (3) participate in the defense.​
934-29.20 (b) The curriculum must be flexible enough to be delivered in community and correctional​
935-29.21settings by individuals with various levels of education and qualifications, including but​
936-29.22not limited to professionals in criminal justice, health care, mental health care, and social​
937-29.23services. The board must review and update the curriculum as needed.​
938-29.24 Subd. 2.Certification and distribution.By January 1, 2023, the board must develop​
939-29.25a process for certifying individuals to deliver the competency restoration attainment​
940-29.26curriculum and make the curriculum available to every certified competency restoration​
941-29.27attainment program and forensic navigator in the state. Each competency restoration​
942-29.28attainment program in the state must use the competency restoration attainment curriculum​
943-29.29under this section as the foundation for delivering competency restoration attainment​
944-29.30education and must not substantially alter the content.​
945-29​Sec. 34.​
946-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 30.1 Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.59, is amended to read:​
947-30.2 611.59 COMPETENCY RESTORATION ATTAINMENT PROGRAMS.​
948-30.3 Subdivision 1.Availability and certification.The board must provide or contract for​
949-30.4enough competency restoration attainment services to meet the needs of adult defendants​
950-30.5in each judicial district who are found incompetent to proceed and do not have access to​
951-30.6competency restoration attainment services as a part of any other programming in which​
952-30.7they are ordered to participate. The board, in consultation with the Certification Advisory​
953-30.8Committee, shall develop procedures to certify that the standards in this section are met,​
954-30.9including procedures for regular recertification of competency restoration attainment​
955-30.10programs. The board shall maintain a list of programs it has certified competency restoration​
956-30.11programs on the board's website to be updated and shall update the list of competency​
957-30.12attainment programs at least once every year.​
958-30.13 Subd. 2.Competency restoration attainment provider standards.Except for jail-based​
959-30.14programs, a competency restoration attainment provider must:​
960-30.15 (1) be able to provide the appropriate mental health or substance use disorder treatment​
961-30.16ordered by the court, including but not limited to treatment in inpatient, residential, and​
962-30.17home-based settings;​
963-30.18 (2) ensure that competency restoration attainment education certified by the board is​
964-30.19provided to defendants and that regular assessments of defendants' progress in attaining​
965-30.20competency are documented;​
966-30.21 (3) designate a head of the program knowledgeable in the processes and requirements​
967-30.22of the competency to stand trial procedures; and​
968-30.23 (4) develop staff procedures or designate a person responsible to ensure timely​
969-30.24communication with the court system.​
970-30.25 Subd. 3.Jail-based competency restoration attainment standards.Jail-based​
971-30.26competency restoration attainment programs must be housed in correctional facilities licensed​
972-30.27by the Department of Corrections under section 241.021 and must:​
973-30.28 (1) have a designated program director who meets minimum qualification standards set​
974-30.29by the board, including understanding the requirements of competency to stand trial​
975-30.30procedures;​
976-30.31 (2) provide minimum mental health services including:​
926+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 29.1 Sec. 34. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.58, is amended to read:​
927+29.2 611.58 COMPETENCY RESTORATION ATTAINMENT CURRICULUM AND​
928+29.3CERTIFICATION.​
929+29.4 Subdivision 1.Curriculum.(a) By January 1, 2023, the board must recommend a​
930+29.5competency restoration attainment curriculum to educate and assist defendants found​
931+29.6incompetent in attaining the ability to:​
932+29.7 (1) rationally consult with counsel;​
933+29.8 (2) understand the proceedings; and​
934+29.9 (3) participate in the defense.​
935+29.10 (b) The curriculum must be flexible enough to be delivered in community and correctional​
936+29.11settings by individuals with various levels of education and qualifications, including but​
937+29.12not limited to professionals in criminal justice, health care, mental health care, and social​
938+29.13services. The board must review and update the curriculum as needed.​
939+29.14 Subd. 2.Certification and distribution.By January 1, 2023, the board must develop​
940+29.15a process for certifying individuals to deliver the competency restoration attainment​
941+29.16curriculum and make the curriculum available to every certified competency restoration​
942+29.17attainment program and forensic navigator in the state. Each competency restoration​
943+29.18attainment program in the state must use the competency restoration attainment curriculum​
944+29.19under this section as the foundation for delivering competency restoration attainment​
945+29.20education and must not substantially alter the content.​
946+29.21Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 611.59, is amended to read:​
947+29.22 611.59 COMPETENCY RESTORATION ATTAINMENT PROGRAMS.​
948+29.23 Subdivision 1.Availability and certification.The board must provide or contract for​
949+29.24enough competency restoration attainment services to meet the needs of adult defendants​
950+29.25in each judicial district who are found incompetent to proceed and do not have access to​
951+29.26competency restoration attainment services as a part of any other programming in which​
952+29.27they are ordered to participate. The board, in consultation with the Certification Advisory​
953+29.28Committee, shall develop procedures to certify that the standards in this section are met,​
954+29.29including procedures for regular recertification of competency restoration attainment​
955+29.30programs. The board shall maintain a list of programs it has certified competency restoration​
956+29.31programs on the board's website to be updated and shall update the list of competency​
957+29.32attainment programs at least once every year.​
958+29​Sec. 35.​
959+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 30.1 Subd. 2.Competency restoration attainment provider standards.Except for jail-based​
960+30.2programs, a competency restoration attainment provider must:​
961+30.3 (1) be able to provide the appropriate mental health or substance use disorder treatment​
962+30.4ordered by the court, including but not limited to treatment in inpatient, residential, and​
963+30.5home-based settings;​
964+30.6 (2) ensure that competency restoration attainment education certified by the board is​
965+30.7provided to defendants and that regular assessments of defendants' progress in attaining​
966+30.8competency are documented;​
967+30.9 (3) designate a head of the program knowledgeable in the processes and requirements​
968+30.10of the competency to stand trial procedures; and​
969+30.11 (4) develop staff procedures or designate a person responsible to ensure timely​
970+30.12communication with the court system.​
971+30.13 Subd. 3.Jail-based competency restoration attainment standards.Jail-based​
972+30.14competency restoration attainment programs must be housed in correctional facilities licensed​
973+30.15by the Department of Corrections under section 241.021 and must:​
974+30.16 (1) have a designated program director who meets minimum qualification standards set​
975+30.17by the board, including understanding the requirements of competency to stand trial​
976+30.18procedures;​
977+30.19 (2) provide minimum mental health services including:​
978+30.20 (i) having multidisciplinary staff sufficient to monitor defendants and provide timely​
979+30.21assessments, treatment, and referrals as needed, including at least one medical professional​
980+30.22licensed to prescribe psychiatric medication;​
981+30.23 (ii) prescribing, dispensing, and administering any medication deemed clinically​
982+30.24appropriate by qualified medical professionals; and​
983+30.25 (iii) having policies and procedures for the administration of involuntary medication;​
984+30.26 (3) ensure that competency restoration attainment education certified by the board is​
985+30.27provided to defendants and regular assessments of defendants' progress in attaining​
986+30.28competency to stand trial are documented;​
987+30.29 (4) develop staff procedures or designate a person responsible to ensure timely​
988+30.30communication with the court system; and​
989+30.31 (5) designate a space in the correctional facility for the program.​
977990 30​Sec. 35.​
978-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 31.1 (i) having multidisciplinary staff sufficient to monitor defendants and provide timely​
979-31.2assessments, treatment, and referrals as needed, including at least one medical professional​
980-31.3licensed to prescribe psychiatric medication;​
981-31.4 (ii) prescribing, dispensing, and administering any medication deemed clinically​
982-31.5appropriate by qualified medical professionals; and​
983-31.6 (iii) having policies and procedures for the administration of involuntary medication;​
984-31.7 (3) ensure that competency restoration attainment education certified by the board is​
985-31.8provided to defendants and regular assessments of defendants' progress in attaining​
986-31.9competency to stand trial are documented;​
987-31.10 (4) develop staff procedures or designate a person responsible to ensure timely​
988-31.11communication with the court system; and​
989-31.12 (5) designate a space in the correctional facility for the program.​
990-31.13 Subd. 4.Program evaluations.(a) The board shall collect the following data:​
991-31.14 (1) the total number of competency examinations ordered in each judicial district​
992-31.15separated by county;​
993-31.16 (2) the age, race, and number of unique defendants and for whom at least one competency​
994-31.17examination was ordered in each judicial district separated by county;​
995-31.18 (3) the age, race, and number of unique defendants found incompetent at least once in​
996-31.19each judicial district separated by county; and​
997-31.20 (4) all available data on the level of charge and adjudication of cases with a defendant​
998-31.21found incompetent and whether a forensic navigator was assigned to the case.​
999-31.22 (b) By February 15 of each year, the board must report to the legislative committees and​
1000-31.23divisions with jurisdiction over human services, public safety, and the judiciary on the data​
1001-31.24collected under this subdivision and may include recommendations for statutory or funding​
1002-31.25changes related to competency restoration attainment.​
1003-31​Sec. 35.​
1004-S0255-1 1st Engrossment​SF255 REVISOR DTT​ 32.1 Sec. 36. Laws 2022, chapter 99, article 3, section 1, is amended to read:​
1005-32.2 Section 1. APPROPRIATION BASE ESTABLISHED; COMPETENCY​
1006-32.3RESTORATION ATTAINMENT.​
1007-32.4 Subdivision 1.Department of Corrections.The general fund appropriation base for​
1008-32.5the commissioner of corrections is $202,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $202,000 in fiscal year​
1009-32.62025 for correctional facilities inspectors.​
1010-32.7 Subd. 2.District courts.The general fund appropriation base for the district courts is​
1011-32.8$5,042,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $5,042,000 in fiscal year 2025 for costs associated with​
1012-32.9additional competency examination costs.​
1013-32.10 Subd. 3.State Competency Restoration Attainment Board.The general fund​
1014-32.11appropriation base for the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board is $11,350,000​
1015-32.12in fiscal year 2024 and $10,900,000 in fiscal year 2025 for staffing and other costs needed​
1016-32.13to establish and perform the duties of the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board,​
1017-32.14including providing educational services necessary to restore defendants to assist defendants​
1018-32.15in attaining competency, or contracting or partnering with other organizations to provide​
1019-32.16those services.​
1020-32.17Sec. 37. COMPETENCY ATTAINMENT BOARD; ESTABLISHMENT;​
1021-32.18APPROPRIATION.​
1022-32.19 $250,000 in fiscal year 2023 is appropriated from the general fund to the State​
1023-32.20Competency Attainment Board to establish the board, hire an administrator and any other​
1024-32.21necessary staff, establish appropriate standards and requirements for a forensic navigator​
1025-32.22program, and establish certifications requirements and procedures for competency attainment​
1026-32.23curriculum and programs.​
1027-32.24Sec. 38. EFFECTIVE DATE.​
1028-32.25 Sections 1 to 37 are effective the day following final enactment.​
991+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 31.1 Subd. 4.Program evaluations.(a) The board shall collect the following data:​
992+31.2 (1) the total number of competency examinations ordered in each judicial district​
993+31.3separated by county;​
994+31.4 (2) the age, race, and number of unique defendants and for whom at least one competency​
995+31.5examination was ordered in each judicial district separated by county;​
996+31.6 (3) the age, race, and number of unique defendants found incompetent at least once in​
997+31.7each judicial district separated by county; and​
998+31.8 (4) all available data on the level of charge and adjudication of cases with a defendant​
999+31.9found incompetent and whether a forensic navigator was assigned to the case.​
1000+31.10 (b) By February 15 of each year, the board must report to the legislative committees and​
1001+31.11divisions with jurisdiction over human services, public safety, and the judiciary on the data​
1002+31.12collected under this subdivision and may include recommendations for statutory or funding​
1003+31.13changes related to competency restoration attainment.​
1004+31.14Sec. 36. Laws 2022, chapter 99, article 3, section 1, is amended to read:​
1005+31.15Section 1. APPROPRIATION BASE ESTABLISHED; COMPETENCY​
1006+31.16RESTORATION ATTAINMENT.​
1007+31.17 Subdivision 1.Department of Corrections.The general fund appropriation base for​
1008+31.18the commissioner of corrections is $202,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $202,000 in fiscal year​
1009+31.192025 for correctional facilities inspectors.​
1010+31.20 Subd. 2.District courts.The general fund appropriation base for the district courts is​
1011+31.21$5,042,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $5,042,000 in fiscal year 2025 for costs associated with​
1012+31.22additional competency examination costs.​
1013+31.23 Subd. 3.State Competency Restoration Attainment Board.The general fund​
1014+31.24appropriation base for the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board is $11,350,000​
1015+31.25in fiscal year 2024 and $10,900,000 in fiscal year 2025 for staffing and other costs needed​
1016+31.26to establish and perform the duties of the State Competency Restoration Attainment Board,​
1017+31.27including providing educational services necessary to restore defendants to assist defendants​
1018+31.28in attaining competency, or contracting or partnering with other organizations to provide​
1019+31.29those services.​
1020+31​Sec. 36.​
1021+23-00794 as introduced​12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL​ 32.1 Sec. 37. COMPETENCY ATTAINMENT BOARD; ESTABLISHMENT;​
1022+32.2APPROPRIATION.​
1023+32.3 $....... in fiscal year 2023 is appropriated from the general fund to the State Competency​
1024+32.4Attainment Board to establish the board, hire an administrator and any other necessary staff,​
1025+32.5establish appropriate standards and requirements for a forensic navigator program, and​
1026+32.6establish certifications requirements and procedures for competency attainment curriculum​
1027+32.7and programs.​
1028+32.8 Sec. 38. EFFECTIVE DATE.​
1029+32.9 Sections 1 to 37 are effective the day following final enactment.​
10291030 32​Sec. 38.​
1030-S0255-1 1st EngrossmentSF255 REVISOR DTT​
1031+23-00794 as introduced12/16/22 REVISOR DTT/HL