Minnesota Senate Bill SF3202

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23

Caption

Liquid fuel modernization tax credit establishment

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly modify state laws concerning fuel regulations by providing a financial incentive for businesses to modernize their fuel infrastructure. The liquid fuel modernization tax credit is designed to enhance the adoption of cleaner fuel alternatives, which aligns with broader environmental goals. By requiring retail fueling sites to offer higher ethanol blends, the bill aims to facilitate a transition to more sustainable energy sources and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Additionally, there is an emphasis on setting equipment compatibility goals, ensuring that by 2028, a minimum percentage of gasoline storage and dispensing equipment will be certified for higher blends of ethanol.

Summary

SF3202 aims to establish a liquid fuel modernization tax credit in Minnesota, which facilitates the installation of fuel infrastructure compatible with higher biofuel blends at retail fueling sites and bulk plants. This initiative is a response to the growing demand for environmentally friendly fuel options and is tailored to encourage the adoption of biofuels such as higher blends of ethanol and biodiesel. The legislation defines various terms to ensure clarity around eligible entities and eligible fuel infrastructure, including the necessary components for compliance with the law. It outlines the processes for claiming the tax credit, which can be substantial for qualified entities during their taxable years after the effective date of the law.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SF3202 may stem from potential disparities in implementation across districts and concerns over the adequacy of existing infrastructure to support higher biofuel blends. Stakeholders from various sectors may express differing opinions on the expected outcomes of the bill, particularly regarding financial implications and the feasibility of meeting the proposed goals in the stipulated timeline. While proponents of the bill emphasize the potential environmental benefits, critics may raise issues about the economic impact on traditional fuel suppliers and the initial costs of compliance for businesses adapting to new standards.