Minnesota Senate Bill SF4513

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/24
• Refer: 3/4/24

Caption

Delivery network benefits and insurance requirements provisions

Impact

If enacted, SF4513 will significantly impact the legal framework surrounding gig work and app-based economy in Minnesota. By defining app-based drivers as independent contractors while demanding DNCs to provide benefits akin to traditional employment, it aims to bridge the gap between gig work and employee protections. This legislation could reshape labor relations by creating a more sustainable livelihood option for app-based drivers, addressing concerns about the precarious nature of gig jobs. However, it also imposes additional operational requirements on DNCs, which may lead to increased costs and regulatory compliance challenges.

Summary

Senate File 4513 (SF4513) establishes new requirements for delivery network companies (DNCs) regarding occupational accident insurance and the creation of portable benefit accounts for app-based drivers. The bill mandates that DNCs must offer occupational accident insurance to app-based drivers, covering medical expenses and lost income due to injuries sustained while providing delivery services. Additionally, the bill stipulates that DNCs will contribute to portable benefit accounts for eligible drivers, aiming to provide a safety net for gig economy workers. Each network company will contribute a specified percentage of the driver's earnings to these accounts quarterly, fostering long-term financial security for workers who often lack traditional employment benefits.

Contention

Notably, the bill has generated discussions regarding the balance of maintaining flexibility in gig work versus ensuring adequate protections for workers. Proponents argue that SF4513 will improve financial security for app-based drivers, while opponents express concerns about the feasibility and costs of compliance for delivery network companies. The preemption clause in the bill, which limits local governments from enacting their own regulations concerning these matters, has also sparked debate about local control and the ability of communities to address unique labor needs.