California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB808

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Engrossed
5/8/25  
Refer
5/8/25  
Refer
5/21/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  
Refer
7/8/25  
Report Pass
7/15/25  

Caption

Campaign statements and registrations: filing online or electronically.

Impact

If enacted, AB 808 would significantly alter the requirements placed on candidates for elective state, county, or city office. One notable provision is the removal of the $100,000 cap on personal loans candidates can extend to their campaigns, which could potentially raise concerns regarding increased influence by wealthy candidates over political processes. Additionally, the bill mandates that all subsequent campaign reports be filed electronically, enhancing the overall transparency and traceability of campaign financing in an increasingly digital age.

Summary

Assembly Bill 808, introduced by Assembly Member Addis, seeks to modernize the processes of campaign statements and registrations by allowing filing online or electronically. This amendment to the Political Reform Act of 1974 aims to eliminate the outdated options of filing via facsimile and instead authorize certain reports to be submitted by email. By making these changes, the bill is expected to streamline campaign finance operations and enhance the accessibility and efficiency of the filing process for candidates and political entities in California.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 808 appears to be generally positive among legislators who advocate for increased transparency and accountability in campaign finance. Supporters argue that these reforms are necessary to adapt to contemporary technological standards, making it easier for candidates to comply. On the other side, some critics express concerns over potential inequities this could create by enabling wealthier candidates to have greater leverage through expanded personal loan options and the implications of digital filing for less tech-savvy candidates.

Contention

A key point of contention within AB 808 revolves around the implications of revoking the cap on personal loans to campaigns, raising questions about fairness in political financing and the influence of money in politics. Additionally, the push for mandatory electronic filing raises accessibility issues for those not familiar with technology, highlighting the need for adequate support systems to ensure that all candidates can comply with these new requirements effectively. The debate reflects broader themes in political reform regarding transparency, voter engagement, and the preservation of democratic principles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

CA AB2041

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: security expenses.

CA SB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds.

CA AB270

Political Reform Act of 1974: public campaign financing.

CA AB2803

Campaign expenditures: criminal convictions: fees and costs.

CA AB37

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: security expenses.

CA SB251

Candidates’ statements: false statements.

CA SB888

Political Reform Act of 1974.

CA SB409

Elections: candidate’s statement.

CA AB3239

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: disclosures.

Similar Bills

CA AB1511

Political Reform Act of 1974: refunding and transferring contributions: voter information guide.

CA SB1239

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.

CA AB1217

Political Reform Act of 1974: electioneering and issue lobbying communications: disclosures.

CA SB888

Political Reform Act of 1974.

CA AB902

Political Reform Act of 1974: Fair Political Practices Commission: regulations.

CA AB236

Campaign disclosure: limited liability companies.

CA AB864

Political Reform Act of 1974: disclosures.