California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB236

Introduced
1/13/21  
Introduced
1/13/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Report Pass
3/10/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
4/15/21  
Refer
4/15/21  
Report Pass
4/28/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Campaign disclosure: limited liability companies.

Impact

The introduction of AB 236 is expected to impact the Political Reform Act of 1974 significantly by broadening its scope. By requiring LLCs to disclose ownership and substantial contributions, the bill aims to reduce anonymity in campaign financing, thereby increasing accountability and transparency in political contributions. This move is seen as a step towards limiting potential abuses where LLCs may serve as vehicles for undisclosed political donations, thus contributing to a more transparent political landscape.

Summary

Assembly Bill 236, introduced by Assembly Member Berman, aims to enhance campaign finance transparency related to limited liability companies (LLCs) that function as political committees. The bill mandates that any LLC qualifying as a committee must file a statement of members with the Secretary of State. This statement should disclose key information, including the names and contributions of members who have a significant interest or have made substantial capital contributions to the LLC. This legislation seeks to codify existing regulations set by the Fair Political Practices Commission pertaining to campaign finance activities of LLCs.

Sentiment

Sentiment around AB 236 appears to be generally supportive among advocates of campaign finance reform who argue that it will provide voters with critical information about who is funding political campaigns. However, there are concerns raised by some business groups about the additional regulatory burdens imposed on LLCs. They argue that the requirements could hinder business operations and participation in political processes due to increased disclosure demands. The bill has sparked a debate on the balance between transparency in political financing and the privacy rights of business owners.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 236 include the potential for increased compliance costs for LLCs, particularly smaller companies that may struggle to navigate the new requirements. Critics contend that while transparency is important, the bill could dissuade LLCs from obtaining political involvement due to fear of public scrutiny. The enforcement mechanism proposed could also lead to increased legal scrutiny for violations of the disclosure rules, raising concerns about the implications for responsible corporate political activity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1422

Disclosures: Travel DISCLOSE Act.

CA AB3239

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: disclosures.

CA AB2041

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: security expenses.

CA SB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds.

CA AB2911

Campaign contributions: agency officers.

CA AB2803

Campaign expenditures: criminal convictions: fees and costs.

CA SB248

Political Reform Act of 1974: disclosures: candidate experience.

CA SB1156

Groundwater sustainability agencies: conflicts of interest: financial interest disclosures.

CA SB1027

Political Reform Act of 1974: disclosures.

CA AB37

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: security expenses.

Similar Bills

CA SB686

Campaign disclosure: limited liability companies.

CA AB902

Political Reform Act of 1974: Fair Political Practices Commission: regulations.

CA AB808

Campaign statements and registrations: filing online or electronically.

CA SB1239

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.

CA AB903

Political Reform Act of 1974.