Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF5155

Introduced
3/21/24  

Caption

Extension provision of the five-year rule for a St. Paul tax increment financing district

Impact

The proposed legislation is expected to have a significant impact on the financial management of TIF projects within St. Paul. By extending the time frame for receiving tax increments, local authorities intend to secure more funding opportunities that would facilitate urban redevelopment and infrastructure improvements. This move aligns with broader state economic development initiatives, as it aims to stimulate local economies while transforming underutilized land into productive property. However, this expansion also poses potential implications for property tax revenue streams, which may require careful balancing by local officials.

Summary

SF5155 is a legislative bill that seeks to amend existing laws regarding tax increment financing (TIF) specifically for the city of St. Paul. The bill proposes to extend the five-year duration limit typically associated with TIF districts to a maximum of eleven years for the Ford Site Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. This extension is aimed at providing essential financial flexibility to the city in achieving its redevelopment goals for the designated area, which is crucial for ongoing urban development efforts in St. Paul.

Contention

Some points of contention regarding SF5155 may arise from concerns about the long-term effects of extending TIF durations. Critics could argue that prolonged TIF districts might delay the overall financial returns to the municipality from these areas, as a significant portion of property tax revenue is diverted to fund redevelopment initiatives. Additionally, there may be concerns among taxpayers and local business owners about transparency and accountability regarding how effectively the extended funds are utilized for the intended development goals. Discussions surrounding this bill will likely continue as stakeholders assess the benefits of economic growth against the fiscal responsibilities owed to current residents.

Companion Bills

MN HF4973

Similar To St. Paul; tax increment financing district five-year rule extension provided.

Previously Filed As

MN HF4973

St. Paul; tax increment financing district five-year rule extension provided.

MN HF2035

Tax increment financing; special rules proposed for the city of St. Paul.

MN SF5001

Edina tax increment financing districts five-year rule extensions and duration extensions authorization

MN HF4942

Edina; tax increment financing districts five-year rule extensions and duration extensions provided.

MN SF1476

Edina five-year rule extensions and duration extensions for tax increment financing provision

MN HF806

Edina; five-year rule extensions and duration extensions for tax increment financing districts provided.

MN SF1952

Nonmetropolitan counties tax increment financing districts five and six year rules extension

MN HF335

Savage; tax increment financing provisions modified, and tax increment financing district special rules amended.

MN HF3585

Maple Grove tax increment financing district special rules authorized.

MN HF263

Shakopee; tax increment financing provisions modified, and tax increment financing district established subject to special rules.

Similar Bills

CA AB1806

Public contracts: information technology: Department of Technology: modular contracting.

NM SB293

Housing Study For Some Development Projects

AL SB260

Tax increment districts, redevelopment projects authorizes to continue through a subsequent tax increment district, Secs. 11-99-2, 11-99-4, 11-99-5, 11-99-6, 11-99-8, 11-99-10 am'd.

AL HB481

Tax increment districts, redevelopment projects authorizes to continue through a subsequent tax increment district, Secs. 11-99-2, 11-99-4, 11-99-5, 11-99-6, 11-99-8, 11-99-10 am'd.

HI HB1457

Relating To Tax Increment Financing.

WI SB103

Developer-financed tax incremental districts.

WI AB96

Developer-financed tax incremental districts.

MN SF261

Various pooling provisions clarification