Minnesota Senate Bill SF955

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 1/30/23

Caption

Three-fifths majority approval requirement from booth bodies to extend peacetime emergencies beyond 30 days

Impact

If enacted, SF955 would fundamentally change the process through which peacetime emergencies are handled in Minnesota. By establishing a requirement for significant legislative consensus to extend emergency declarations, the bill would reduce the governor's capacity to act independently in crises. This shift reflects a growing concern regarding the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, particularly in response to the recent experiences during prolonged emergencies, such as those resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Proponents of the bill argue that it will promote accountability and transparency in government operations during emergencies.

Summary

Senate File 955 aims to amend the existing Minnesota Statutes concerning peacetime emergencies by requiring that any extension beyond 30 days must be approved by a three-fifths majority vote from both legislative bodies. The bill seeks to enhance legislative oversight over the governor's power to declare and extend emergencies, ensuring that extended emergency declarations cannot be made unilaterally and instead involve explicit legislative approval. This amendment intends to establish a more democratic check on executive power during emergencies.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding SF955. Supporters emphasize the necessity of legislative involvement in responding to emergencies, citing concerns that unchecked powers can lead to overreach and a lack of accountability. Conversely, opponents argue that the changes could hinder swift responses to emergencies, as requiring a supermajority could complicate and delay necessary actions. Critics also worry that this could lead to political maneuvering during crises, where legislative dynamics might interfere with effective emergency management. Hence, the discussion around this bill underscores the delicate balance between civil safety and governmental accountability.