Minnesota House Bill HF1028

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/25
• Refer: 2/17/25

Caption

Education finance increased for school district funding; general education basic formula allowance; special education cross subsidy aid; school unemployment aid account in special revenue fund; English learner cross subsidy aid; safe schools revenue; equalization aid for debt service levies, local optional revenue, and operating referendum; extended time revenue linked to general education basic formula allowance; school's compensatory revenue eligibility calculated on the basis of both direct certification and the application of education benefits; school board authorized to renew voter-approved operating referendum more than one time; and money appropriated.

Impact

The proposed changes in HF1028 would affect various state laws, particularly those concerning education finance and funding allocations for school districts. The adjustments to the funding formula intend to ensure that each district can maintain appropriate levels of educational service amidst rising costs. Furthermore, the introduction of a mechanism allowing school boards to renew voter-approved operating referendums more flexibly may help districts secure ongoing financial support without needing to hold an election each time.

Summary

House File 1028 addresses various aspects of education finance in Minnesota, proposing significant increases in funding for school districts. Key elements of the bill include adjustments to the general education basic formula allowance and the establishment of additional funding for special education cross-subsidy aid. This increase is aimed at providing additional support to districts struggling with the costs associated with special education services, which often exceed their allocated budgets. Funding for programs supporting English learners and safe schools is also set to be increased, reflecting an emphasis on inclusive education.

Contention

While there is a clear intent to bolster education funding, contentious issues may arise from the reforms in how referendums regarding funding can be renewed. Critics may argue that allowing school boards to bypass a democratic vote undermines voter intent and could lead to excessive levying without checks from the electorate. Additionally, the bill may provoke debate on whether the increases in funding are sufficient to meet the diverse needs of all districts, particularly those with dramatically different funding capacities and challenges.