Minnesota House Bill HF1991

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25

Caption

Persons prohibited from allowing minors to access chatbots for recreational purposes, and civil penalties provided.

Impact

If enacted, HF1991 will amend Minnesota Statutes, creating a specific prohibition that will require service providers to implement age verification measures before granting access to chatbots. Non-compliance with this statute can lead to civil actions for damages, with statutory damages capped at $1,000 per violation. Additionally, severe infractions could trigger penalties up to $5 million enforced by the attorney general, representing a significant legal risk for companies involved in offering chatbot services.

Summary

House File 1991 (HF1991) seeks to regulate the accessibility of chatbots to minors, defining chatbots as programs designed to simulate conversation over the internet. The bill explicitly prohibits website owners, application developers, and program operators from allowing individuals under the age of 18 to access such services for recreational purposes. This initiative arises from growing concerns regarding the potential risks that online chatbots pose to young users, particularly in unregulated environments where inappropriate content may be accessible.

Contention

Controversies surrounding HF1991 may arise regarding the practicality and effectiveness of age verification methods, as well as the implications of imposing hefty fines on companies found in violation. Opponents may argue that the bill places an undue burden on smaller developers who may lack the resources to implement comprehensive age verification systems. Furthermore, there may be concerns about the unintended consequences of restricting access to educational and support chatbots that could also be beneficial to minors.

Final_note

In summary, HF1991 addresses a timely issue in the digital landscape by aiming to protect minors from potential risks associated with chatbot interactions. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it will be crucial to address the practical challenges of implementation, balancing youth protection with technological innovation and access.