Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF2008 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 03/06/2025

                            1.1	A bill for an act​
1.2 relating to higher education; modifying provisions related to campus sexual​
1.3 misconduct; amending Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 135A.15, subdivisions​
1.4 1a, 2a.​
1.5BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:​
1.6 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 135A.15, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:​
1.7 Subd. 1a.Definitions.(a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the​
1.8meanings given.​
1.9 (b) "Advisor" means a person who is selected by a responding or reporting party to serve​
1.10as a support during a campus investigation and disciplinary process. This person may be​
1.11an attorney. An advisor serves as a support to a party by offering comfort or attending​
1.12meetings.​
1.13 (c) "Domestic violence" has the meaning given in section 518B.01, subdivision 2.​
1.14 (d) "Incident" means one report of sexual misconduct to a postsecondary institution,​
1.15regardless of the number of complainants included in the report, the number of respondents​
1.16included in the report, and whether or not the identity of any party is known by the reporting​
1.17postsecondary institution. Incident encompasses all nonconsensual events included within​
1.18one report if multiple events have been identified.​
1.19 (e) "Intimate partner violence" means any physical or sexual harm or a pattern of any​
1.20other coercive behavior committed, enabled, or solicited to gain or maintain power and​
1.21control over a victim, including verbal, psychological, economic, or technological abuse​
1​Section 1.​
REVISOR VH/NS 25-00079​01/08/25 ​
State of Minnesota​
This Document can be made available​
in alternative formats upon request​
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES​
H. F. No.  2008​
NINETY-FOURTH SESSION​
Authored by Hanson, J.; Kotyza-Witthuhn and Finke​03/06/2025​
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Higher Education Finance and Policy​ 2.1that may or may not constitute criminal behavior against an individual, that may be classified​
2.2as a sexual misconduct, dating violence, or domestic violence caused by:​
2.3 (1) a current or former spouse of the individual; or​
2.4 (2) a person in a sexual or romantic relationship with the individual.​
2.5 (f) "Nonconsensual dissemination of sexual images" has the meaning given in section​
2.6617.261.​
2.7 (g) "Reporting party" means the party in a disciplinary proceeding who has reported​
2.8being subjected to conduct or communication that could constitute sexual misconduct.​
2.9 (h) "Responding party" means the party in a disciplinary proceeding who has been​
2.10reported to be the perpetrator of conduct or communication that could constitute sexual​
2.11misconduct.​
2.12 (i) "Retaliation" means intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination against a​
2.13reporting party, responding party, or witness for the purpose of interfering with any right​
2.14or privilege or because the person has reported information, made a complaint, testified,​
2.15assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation,​
2.16proceeding, or hearing under this section, including in nondisciplinary restorative justice​
2.17services.​
2.18 (j) "Sexual assault" means rape, sex offenses - fondling, sex offenses - incest, or sex​
2.19offenses - statutory rape as defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 34, part 668, subpart​
2.20D, appendix A, as amended.​
2.21 (j) (k) "Sexual extortion" has the meaning given in section 609.3458.​
2.22 (k) (l) "Sex trafficking" has the meaning given in section 609.321, subdivision 7a.​
2.23 (l) (m) "Sexual harassment" has the meaning given in section 363A.03, subdivision 43.​
2.24 (m) (n) "Sexual misconduct" means an incident of sexual violence, intimate partner​
2.25violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, sexual harassment, nonconsensual distribution​
2.26of sexual images, sexual extortion, nonconsensual dissemination of a deepfake depicting​
2.27intimate parts or sexual acts, sex trafficking, or stalking.​
2.28 (n) (o) "Stalking" has the meaning given in section 609.749.​
2.29 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 135A.15, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:​
2.30 Subd. 2a.Campus investigation and disciplinary hearing procedures sexual​
2.31misconduct grievance process.(a) A postsecondary institution must establish a sexual​
2​Sec. 2.​
REVISOR VH/NS 25-00079​01/08/25 ​ 3.1misconduct grievance process as outlined in this section. The institution must provide a​
3.2reporting party an opportunity for an impartial, timely, and thorough investigation of a​
3.3report of sexual misconduct against a student. If an investigation reveals that sexual​
3.4misconduct has occurred, the institution must take prompt and effective steps reasonably​
3.5calculated to end the sexual misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and, as appropriate, remedy​
3.6its effects. Remedial action may include either or both of the following:​
3.7 (1) disciplinary action against the responding party; and​
3.8 (2) with the consent of the victim, nondisciplinary restorative justice services.​
3.9 (b) Throughout any investigation or disciplinary proceeding, a postsecondary institution​
3.10must treat the reporting parties, responding parties, witnesses, and other participants in the​
3.11proceeding with dignity and respect.​
3.12 (c) If a postsecondary institution conducts a hearing, an advisor may provide opening​
3.13and closing remarks on behalf of a party or assist with formulating questions to the other​
3.14party or witnesses about related evidence or credibility. A postsecondary institution must​
3.15provide due process protections before imposing disciplinary action against a responding​
3.16party who is a student. The responding party must be informed in writing of the allegations;​
3.17the reporting party; and the date, time, and location of the alleged sexual misconduct. The​
3.18responding party must be provided with the campus code of conduct guidelines listing​
3.19possible sanctions. If the responding party is an employee, the institution must publish the​
3.20employee grievance process if different from the student grievance process for sexual​
3.21misconduct allegations.​
3.22 (d) A hearing or other proceeding related to disciplinary action under this paragraph is​
3.23subject to the following requirements:​
3.24 (1) the reporting and responding party must be given equal opportunity to:​
3.25 (i) present relevant evidence and witnesses;​
3.26 (ii) retain an advisor, who may be an attorney, to serve as support to a reporting or​
3.27responding party, in any meeting, interview, or disciplinary process, and any restriction of​
3.28an advisor's role must be applied equally to the reporting and responding parties;​
3.29 (iii) inspect, review, and respond to relevant evidence and testimony provided by either​
3.30party and witnesses collected through an investigative report written by the institution or​
3.31designee; and​
3.32 (iv) discuss the investigation and disciplinary proceedings with their advisor and parents​
3.33or guardians;​
3​Sec. 2.​
REVISOR VH/NS 25-00079​01/08/25 ​ 4.1 (2) the institution must:​
4.2 (i) allow for the opportunity for both parties to question the credibility of the other party​
4.3and witnesses;​
4.4 (ii) appoint a decision maker or a panel of decision makers who is not the investigator​
4.5to assess credibility of the parties and witnesses;​
4.6 (iii) allow an advisor to provide opening and closing remarks on behalf of a party or​
4.7assist with formulating questions to the other party or witnesses about related evidence or​
4.8credibility, if a postsecondary institution conducts a hearing;​
4.9 (iv) provide the reporting and responding parties with the opportunity to provide​
4.10testimony without encountering the other party in person, and to review testimony provided​
4.11by the other party in a similar manner. This may be done through video conference or​
4.12closed-circuit television;​
4.13 (v) proceed with the campus sexual misconduct grievance process, if requested by the​
4.14victim, concurrently with a criminal investigation; and​
4.15 (vi) deliver the outcome of the grievance process simultaneously to the reporting and​
4.16responding party;​
4.17 (3) if an institution allows for cross-examination of witnesses and parties, neither the​
4.18reporting party nor responding party may be permitted to personally cross-examine one​
4.19another or other witnesses. Any cross-examination must be performed by:​
4.20 (i) a neutral third party; or​
4.21 (ii) an adjudicator of the campus disciplinary proceeding;​
4.22 (4) personal information related to character witness or the sexual behavior of the​
4.23reporting party or mental health records is impermissible;​
4.24 (5) if applicable, the institution must:​
4.25 (i) inform counseling services in a timely manner that a decision of sexual misconduct​
4.26will occur without identifying the parties;​
4.27 (ii) ensure availability of services; and​
4.28 (iii) refer parties equitably;​
4.29 (6) in any grievance process arising from an alleged incident of sexual misconduct​
4.30against a student, a postsecondary institution must apply a preponderance of the evidence​
4.31standard of proof; and​
4​Sec. 2.​
REVISOR VH/NS 25-00079​01/08/25 ​ 5.1 (7) retaliation against a reporting party, responding party, or witness due to a person's​
5.2participation in a campus sexual misconduct process is prohibited.​
5​Sec. 2.​
REVISOR VH/NS 25-00079​01/08/25 ​