Counties authorized to establish pools of election judges by random selection, and counties and cities allowed to require appointed registered voters to serve as election judges.
Impact
The bill will amend Minnesota Statutes related to election judges, specifically section 204B.21. This modification ensures that election judges must meet all established eligibility requirements without discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or economic status. By allowing for random selection, the bill could lead to a more representative pool of election judges, which is crucial for maintaining public trust in the electoral process.
Summary
House File 2095 aims to enhance the process by which counties in Minnesota can establish pools of election judges through random selection. This bill allows county boards to direct auditors to randomly select registered voters to serve as election judges, thereby potentially increasing the diversity and availability of individuals serving in this critical role during elections. The intent behind this change is to simplify the selection process and encourage broader participation from the general public in overseeing electoral fairness.
Contention
While the provisions of HF2095 are designed to streamline the election process, there may be concerns over how random selection could affect the readiness and experience of those chosen as election judges. Advocacy groups and political representatives may voice differing opinions regarding the effectiveness of this method compared to traditional selection methods, raising questions about preparedness and the maintenance of high standards for those overseeing elections. The bill's passage may therefore trigger discussions surrounding the balance between inclusivity and the professionalism required in election management.
Cities and counties required to establish citizen redistricting commissions to conduct redistricting, certain counties required to have seven-member county boards, certain cities required to have wards, and time frame for voters to challenge redistricting plans expanded.
Certain cities and counties citizen redistricting commissions requirement establishment, seven-member county boards required for certain counties, redistricting plans challenge by voters time from expansion, amending certain state statutes
Ranked choice voting in elections for federal and state offices provided; Ranked Choice Voting Task Force established; jurisdictions authorized to adopt ranked choice voting for local offices; procedures established for adoption, implementation, and use of ranked choice voting; use of electronic voting systems with a reallocation feature allowed; report required; and money appropriated.