Minnesota House Bill HF2119

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/10/25

Caption

Elections integrity act established requiring photo ID to register and to vote, ID cards and provisional ballots established, and criminal penalties increased.

Impact

The implementation of HF2119 is expected to significantly alter current voting procedures in Minnesota. All applicants for voting will now need to present a valid photo ID to register and participate in elections. This mandates an expansion of voter education campaigns to ensure that citizens are aware of these new requirements. It also influences administrative budgets, with allocations for public education campaigns and necessary adjustments in the statewide voter registration system. The bill further tightens provisions around absentee voting and the identification of individuals assisting voters.

Summary

House File 2119, known as the Minnesota Elections Integrity Act, establishes stricter voter identification measures by requiring photo identification for voter registration and voting. The bill aims to enhance the integrity of elections in Minnesota, contending that stricter identification will reduce voter fraud and improve accountability. Additionally, the act introduces a new voter identification card and sets forth guidelines for the issuance of provisional ballots. These ballots will come into play when voters cannot provide the required identification at the polling station, thus ensuring that no eligible voter is turned away.

Contention

The bill has sparked considerable debate among legislators and the public. Proponents argue that it is a necessary step to safeguard elections and ensure that only eligible voters can cast ballots, thereby reinforcing public confidence in electoral processes. Conversely, critics express concern that the new identification requirements could disenfranchise eligible voters, particularly those from low-income communities or minority groups who may not possess the required identification. Additionally, the potential increase in criminal penalties for violations associated with voter fraud adds a level of contention, raising fears of punitive measures against citizens trying to exercise their democratic rights.