Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF3054

Introduced
4/2/25  

Caption

Prescription drug transparency provisions modified.

Impact

The proposed changes underpin a broader initiative to regulate and oversee prescription drug pricing transparency in Minnesota. By establishing rigorous reporting obligations for covered entities, HF3054 aims to simplify the tracking of drug costs and enhance public awareness regarding the financial aspects tied to prescription medications. The shift could potentially empower consumers and regulatory bodies to better understand market dynamics and facilitate more informed legislative action aimed at curbing excessive pricing practices among pharmaceutical companies.

Summary

House File 3054 seeks to enhance transparency in prescription drug pricing by modifying existing provisions related to the reporting of costs and revenues for entities participating in the federal 340B program. The bill proposes amendments to Minnesota Statutes aiming to require covered entities, such as hospitals and pharmacies, to report specific data regarding drug acquisition costs, payments received, pricing units, and any associated payments made to contract pharmacies. This reporting requirement encompasses both the forms of payment and the payer types which include commercial insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare, creating a comprehensive data landscape regarding drug pricing and accessibility for stakeholders.

Contention

While HF3054 is aimed at accountability and transparency, its implementation may invite contention among stakeholders. For instance, pharmaceutical manufacturers may argue that the increased reporting requirements could burden their operations and hinder competitive practices. Conversely, advocates for drug pricing reform contend that transparency is crucial for enabling fair market competition and ensuring accessible medication for consumers. As such, the discussions around the bill indicate a duality in perspectives regarding the balance between industry operational freedom and consumer rights.

Companion Bills

MN SF3294

Similar To Prescription drug transparency provisions modifications

Similar Bills

MN SF3294

Prescription drug transparency provisions modifications

MN SF2477

Health insurance, Medicare supplement benefits and prescription drugs provisions modifications

MN HF2851

Reverse auction procurement requirement for SEGIP pharmacy benefit contracts modified, use of spread pricing by pharmacy benefit managers prohibited, license application fees increased, fiduciary duties imposed, and money appropriated.

MN SF3063

Reverse auction procurement requirement modification for SEGIP pharmacy benefit contracts

MN SF102

Hospitals and health care providers gross tax revenue repeal and technical changes made

MN SF1574

Commissioner of human services selection of a state pharmacy benefit manager through procurement requirement provision, commissioner of human services entrance into a master contract with the state pharmacy benefit manager requirement provision, and program authority and eligibility requirements specification provision

MN HF2242

Commissioner of human services required to select a state pharmacy benefit manager through procurement, commissioner required to enter into a master contract with the state pharmacy benefit manager, program authority and eligibility requirements specified, and report required.

TX HB2536

Relating to transparency related to drug costs.