Minnesota House Bill HF3312

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/9/25
• Refer: 5/9/25

Caption

Perpich Center for Arts Education high school converted to pupil-based funding for two years; Perpich Center for Arts Education closed on June 30, 2027; and money appropriated.

Impact

The impact of HF3312 on state education laws is profound, particularly concerning the Perpich Center’s future role in arts education. By abolishing the institution, the bill potentially dismantles a dedicated avenue for arts-focused education, requiring the Department of Education to distribute resources and support for arts education through other means. A new division will be created to support arts education statewide, indicating that while the Center itself will cease to exist, efforts will continue in some capacity to enhance arts opportunities for pupils, albeit possibly with fewer resources.

Summary

HF3312 proposes significant changes to the funding and operational status of the Perpich Center for Arts Education. The bill transitions the funding model for this institution to a pupil-based funding approach for the fiscal years 2026 and 2027. It also sets forth the closure of the Perpich Center effective June 30, 2027, establishing that any remaining funds will revert to the state's general fund. This shift may have far-reaching implications on how arts education is delivered in Minnesota, particularly at a time when financial resources are becoming increasingly critical in educational institutions.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HF3312 involve the adequacy of arts education resources provided through the new funding model and the implications of the Perpich Center's closure on local educational institutions. Advocates for the arts express concerns that the elimination of the Center could lead to a reduction in specialized arts programs and a negative impact on students who benefit from robust arts education. Conversely, proponents argue that the changes represent a modernization of funding models that could make arts education more accessible through general school funding rather than a standalone institution.