| 32 | | - | Authored by Koznick and Robbins02/13/2025 |
|---|
| 33 | | - | The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation Finance and Policy |
|---|
| 34 | | - | Adoption of Report: Placed on the General Register as Amended03/13/2025 |
|---|
| 35 | | - | Read for the Second Time 2.1 (2) adds highway traffic capacity or provides for grade separation of motor vehicle traffic |
|---|
| 36 | | - | 2.2at an intersection additional lane miles, excluding auxiliary lanes with a length of less than |
|---|
| 37 | | - | 2.32,500 5,000 feet. |
|---|
| 38 | | - | 2.4 (e) "Greenhouse gas emissions" includes those emissions described in section 216H.01, |
|---|
| 39 | | - | 2.5subdivision 2. |
|---|
| 40 | | - | 2.6 Subd. 2.Project or portfolio assessment.(a) Prior to inclusion of a project or portfolio |
|---|
| 41 | | - | 2.7in the state transportation improvement program or in a metropolitan transportation |
|---|
| 42 | | - | 2.8improvement program, the applicable entity must perform an impact assessment of the |
|---|
| 43 | | - | 2.9project or portfolio. Following the assessment, the applicable entity must determine if the |
|---|
| 44 | | - | 2.10project or portfolio is proportionally in conformance consistent with: |
|---|
| 45 | | - | 2.11 (1) the greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets under section 174.01, subdivision 3; |
|---|
| 46 | | - | 2.12and |
|---|
| 47 | | - | 2.13 (2) the vehicle miles traveled reduction targets established in the statewide multimodal |
|---|
| 48 | | - | 2.14transportation plan under section 174.03, subdivision 1a. |
|---|
| 49 | | - | 2.15 (b) The applicable entity may evaluate consistency under paragraph (a) taking into |
|---|
| 50 | | - | 2.16account net greenhouse gas emissions reductions (1) otherwise resulting from projects within |
|---|
| 51 | | - | 2.17that portfolio, and (2) due to other identified projects in the state transportation improvement |
|---|
| 52 | | - | 2.18program, the appropriate metropolitan transportation improvement program, or a combination. |
|---|
| 53 | | - | 2.19A project or portfolio evaluation must not account for the same projects as identified in a |
|---|
| 54 | | - | 2.20separate evaluation under this subdivision. |
|---|
| 55 | | - | 2.21 (c) If the applicable entity determines that the project or portfolio is not in conformance |
|---|
| 56 | | - | 2.22with does not meet the consistency under paragraph (a), the applicable entity must: |
|---|
| 57 | | - | 2.23 (1) alter the scope or design of the project or any number of projects, add or remove one |
|---|
| 58 | | - | 2.24or more projects from the portfolio, or undertake a combination, and subsequently perform |
|---|
| 59 | | - | 2.25a revised assessment that meets the requirements under this section; |
|---|
| 60 | | - | 2.26 (2) interlink sufficient impact mitigation as provided in subdivision 4; or |
|---|
| 61 | | - | 2.27 (3) halt project development and disallow inclusion of the project or portfolio in the |
|---|
| 62 | | - | 2.28appropriate transportation improvement program. |
|---|
| 63 | | - | 2.29 Subd. 2a.Applicable projects; implementation.(a) For purposes of this section: |
|---|
| 64 | | - | 2.30 (1) prior to the date established under paragraph (b), a project or portfolio is a capacity |
|---|
| 65 | | - | 2.31expansion project (c), the requirements under this section do not apply to any project; and |
|---|
| 66 | | - | 2Section 1. |
|---|
| 67 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT 3.1 (2) on and after the date established under paragraph (b) (c), a project or portfolio is a |
|---|
| 68 | | - | 3.2capacity expansion project or a collection of trunk highway and multimodal projects for a |
|---|
| 69 | | - | 3.3fiscal year and specific region. |
|---|
| 70 | | - | 3.4 (b) A project or portfolio does not include a project that: |
|---|
| 71 | | - | 3.5 (1) is identified as included in the transportation safety investment category established |
|---|
| 72 | | - | 3.6in the Minnesota state highway investment plan under section 174.03, subdivision 1c; |
|---|
| 73 | | - | 3.7 (2) is funded wholly or in part from federal funds; or |
|---|
| 74 | | - | 3.8 (3) is exempted by the commissioner as provided under subdivision 7, paragraph (b). |
|---|
| 75 | | - | 3.9 (c) The commissioner must establish a date to implement impact assessments on the |
|---|
| 76 | | - | 3.10basis of assessing a portfolio or program of projects instead of on a project-by-project basis. |
|---|
| 77 | | - | 3.11The date must be: |
|---|
| 78 | | - | 3.12 (1) August 1, 2027 2030, which applies to projects that first enter the appropriate |
|---|
| 79 | | - | 3.13transportation improvement program for fiscal year 2031 2034 or a subsequent year; or |
|---|
| 80 | | - | 3.14 (2) as established by the commissioner, if the commissioner: |
|---|
| 81 | | - | 3.15 (i) consults with metropolitan planning organizations; |
|---|
| 82 | | - | 3.16 (ii) prioritizes and makes reasonable efforts to meet the date under clause (1) or an earlier |
|---|
| 83 | | - | 3.17date; |
|---|
| 84 | | - | 3.18 (iii) determines that the date established under this clause is the earliest practicable in |
|---|
| 85 | | - | 3.19which the necessary models and tools are sufficient for analysis under this section; and |
|---|
| 86 | | - | 3.20 (iv) submits a notice to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative |
|---|
| 87 | | - | 3.21committees and divisions with jurisdiction over transportation policy and finance, which |
|---|
| 88 | | - | 3.22must identify the date established and summarize the efforts under item (ii) and the |
|---|
| 89 | | - | 3.23determination under item (iii). |
|---|
| 90 | | - | 3.24 Subd. 3.Assessment requirements.(a) The commissioner must establish a process to |
|---|
| 91 | | - | 3.25implement the requirements under this section, which includes: |
|---|
| 92 | | - | 3.26 (1) any necessary policies, procedures, manuals, and technical specifications; |
|---|
| 93 | | - | 3.27 (2) procedures to perform an impact assessment that provide for the determination under |
|---|
| 94 | | - | 3.28subdivision 2; |
|---|
| 95 | | - | 3.29 (3) in consultation with the technical advisory committee under section 161.1782, criteria |
|---|
| 96 | | - | 3.30for identification of a capacity expansion project; and |
|---|
| 97 | | - | 3Section 1. |
|---|
| 98 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT 4.1 (4) related data reporting from local units of government on local multimodal |
|---|
| 99 | | - | 4.2transportation systems and local project impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle |
|---|
| 100 | | - | 4.3miles traveled. |
|---|
| 101 | | - | 4.4 (b) Analysis under an assessment must include but is not limited to estimates resulting |
|---|
| 102 | | - | 4.5from a project or portfolio for the following: |
|---|
| 103 | | - | 4.6 (1) greenhouse gas emissions over a period of 20 years; and |
|---|
| 104 | | - | 4.7 (2) a net change in vehicle miles traveled for the affected network; and |
|---|
| 105 | | - | 4.8 (3) (2) impacts to trunk highways and related impacts to local road systems, on a local, |
|---|
| 106 | | - | 4.9regional, or statewide basis, as appropriate. |
|---|
| 107 | | - | 4.10 Subd. 4.Impact mitigation; interlinking.(a) To provide for impact mitigation, the |
|---|
| 108 | | - | 4.11applicable entity must interlink the project or portfolio as provided in this subdivision. |
|---|
| 109 | | - | 4.12 (b) Impact mitigation is sufficient under subdivision 2, paragraph (b) (c), if the project |
|---|
| 110 | | - | 4.13or portfolio is interlinked to offset actions such that the total greenhouse gas emissions |
|---|
| 111 | | - | 4.14reduction from the offset actions, after accounting for the greenhouse gas emissions otherwise |
|---|
| 112 | | - | 4.15resulting from the project or portfolio, is consistent with meeting the targets specified under |
|---|
| 113 | | - | 4.16subdivision 2, paragraph (a) that reduce the greenhouse gas emissions otherwise resulting |
|---|
| 114 | | - | 4.17from the project or portfolio. Each comparison under this paragraph must be performed |
|---|
| 115 | | - | 4.18over equal comparison periods. |
|---|
| 116 | | - | 4.19 (c) An offset action consists of a project, program, operations modification, or mitigation |
|---|
| 117 | | - | 4.20plan in one or more of the following areas: |
|---|
| 118 | | - | 4.21 (1) transit expansion, including but not limited to regular route bus, arterial bus rapid |
|---|
| 119 | | - | 4.22transit, highway bus rapid transit, rail transit, and intercity passenger rail; |
|---|
| 120 | | - | 4.23 (2) transit service improvements, including but not limited to increased service level, |
|---|
| 121 | | - | 4.24transit fare reduction, and transit priority treatments; |
|---|
| 122 | | - | 4.25 (3) active transportation infrastructure; |
|---|
| 123 | | - | 4.26 (4) micromobility infrastructure and service, including but not limited to shared vehicle |
|---|
| 124 | | - | 4.27services; |
|---|
| 125 | | - | 4.28 (5) transportation demand management, including but not limited to vanpool and shared |
|---|
| 126 | | - | 4.29vehicle programs, remote work, and broadband access expansion; |
|---|
| 127 | | - | 4.30 (6) parking management, including but not limited to parking requirements reduction |
|---|
| 128 | | - | 4.31or elimination and parking cost adjustments; |
|---|
| 129 | | - | 4Section 1. |
|---|
| 130 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT 5.1 (7) land use, including but not limited to residential and other density increases, mixed-use |
|---|
| 131 | | - | 5.2development, and transit-oriented development; |
|---|
| 132 | | - | 5.3 (8) infrastructure improvements related to traffic operations, including but not limited |
|---|
| 133 | | - | 5.4to roundabouts and reduced conflict intersections; |
|---|
| 134 | | - | 5.5 (9) natural systems, including but not limited to prairie restoration, reforestation, and |
|---|
| 135 | | - | 5.6urban green space; and |
|---|
| 136 | | - | 5.7 (10) improvements to fuel efficiency or adoption of clean fuel technology; |
|---|
| 137 | | - | 5.8 (11) acceleration of electric vehicle and other zero-emission vehicle adoption, including |
|---|
| 138 | | - | 5.9but not limited to electric vehicle infrastructure and zero-emission transit bus procurement |
|---|
| 139 | | - | 5.10under the requirements specified in law; |
|---|
| 140 | | - | 5.11 (12) freight rail infrastructure and service improvements; |
|---|
| 141 | | - | 5.12 (13) photovoltaic systems attached or adjacent to transportation facilities; and |
|---|
| 142 | | - | 5.13 (14) as specified by the commissioner in the manner provided under paragraph (e). |
|---|
| 143 | | - | 5.14 (d) An offset action may be identified as interlinked to the project or portfolio if: |
|---|
| 144 | | - | 5.15 (1) there is a specified project, program, modification, or mitigation plan; |
|---|
| 145 | | - | 5.16 (2) the necessary funding sources are amount is identified and sufficient amounts are |
|---|
| 146 | | - | 5.17committed; |
|---|
| 147 | | - | 5.18 (3) the mitigation is localized as provided in subdivision 5; and |
|---|
| 148 | | - | 5.19 (4) procedures are established to ensure that the mitigation action remains in substantially |
|---|
| 149 | | - | 5.20the same form or a revised form that continues to meet the calculation under paragraph (b). |
|---|
| 150 | | - | 5.21 (e) The commissioner may authorize additional offset actions under paragraph (c) if: |
|---|
| 151 | | - | 5.22 (1) the offset action is reviewed and recommended by the technical advisory committee |
|---|
| 152 | | - | 5.23under section 161.1782; and |
|---|
| 153 | | - | 5.24 (2) the commissioner determines that the offset action is directly related to reduction in |
|---|
| 154 | | - | 5.25the transportation sector of greenhouse gas emissions or vehicle miles traveled. |
|---|
| 155 | | - | 5.26 Subd. 5.Impact mitigation; localization.(a) An offset action under subdivision 4 must |
|---|
| 156 | | - | 5.27be localized in the following priority order: |
|---|
| 157 | | - | 5.28 (1) if the offset action is for one project, within or associated with at least one of the |
|---|
| 158 | | - | 5.29communities impacted by the project; |
|---|
| 159 | | - | 5Section 1. |
|---|
| 160 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT 6.1 (2) if clause (1) does not apply or there is not a reasonably feasible location under clause |
|---|
| 161 | | - | 6.2(1), in areas of persistent poverty or historically disadvantaged communities, as measured |
|---|
| 162 | | - | 6.3and defined in federal law, guidance, and notices of funding opportunity; |
|---|
| 163 | | - | 6.4 (3) if there is not a reasonably feasible location under clauses (1) and (2), in the region |
|---|
| 164 | | - | 6.5of the project or portfolio; or |
|---|
| 165 | | - | 6.6 (4) if there is not a reasonably feasible location under clauses (1) to (3), on a statewide |
|---|
| 166 | | - | 6.7basis. |
|---|
| 167 | | - | 6.8 (b) The applicable entity must include an explanation regarding the feasibility and |
|---|
| 168 | | - | 6.9rationale for each mitigation action located under paragraph (a), clauses (2) to (4). |
|---|
| 169 | | - | 6.10 Subd. 6.Public information.The commissioner must publish information regarding |
|---|
| 170 | | - | 6.11impact assessments on the department's website. The information must include: |
|---|
| 171 | | - | 6.12 (1) for each project evaluated separately under this section, identification of the project; |
|---|
| 172 | | - | 6.13 (2) for each project evaluated separately, a summary that includes an overview of the |
|---|
| 173 | | - | 6.14assessment, the impact determination by the commissioner, and project disposition, including |
|---|
| 174 | | - | 6.15a review of any offset actions and the offset action costs; |
|---|
| 175 | | - | 6.16 (3) for each portfolio of projects, an overview of the projects, the impact determination |
|---|
| 176 | | - | 6.17by the commissioner, and a summary of any offset actions and the offset action costs; |
|---|
| 177 | | - | 6.18 (4) a review of any interpretation of or additions to offset actions under subdivision 4; |
|---|
| 178 | | - | 6.19 (5) identification of the date established by the commissioner under subdivision 2a, |
|---|
| 179 | | - | 6.20paragraph (b) (c); and |
|---|
| 180 | | - | 6.21 (6) identification of any exemptions provided under subdivision 7, paragraph (b); and |
|---|
| 181 | | - | 6.22 (7) a summary of the activities of the technical advisory committee under section |
|---|
| 182 | | - | 6.23161.1782, including but not limited to any findings or recommendations made by the advisory |
|---|
| 183 | | - | 6.24committee. |
|---|
| 184 | | - | 6.25 Subd. 7.Safety and well-being.(a) The requirements of this section are in addition to |
|---|
| 185 | | - | 6.26and must not supplant the safety and well-being goals established under section 174.01, |
|---|
| 186 | | - | 6.27subdivision 2, clauses (1) and (2). |
|---|
| 187 | | - | 6.28 (b) The commissioner may exempt a project from the requirements under this section |
|---|
| 188 | | - | 6.29if the commissioner: |
|---|
| 189 | | - | 6.30 (1) identifies a priority for urgent traffic safety response to traffic fatalities or serious |
|---|
| 190 | | - | 6.31injuries; and |
|---|
| 191 | | - | 6Section 1. |
|---|
| 192 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT 7.1 (2) in consultation with the technical advisory committee under section 161.1782, |
|---|
| 193 | | - | 7.2determines that the project reasonably addresses the traffic safety priority identified under |
|---|
| 194 | | - | 7.3clause (1). |
|---|
| 195 | | - | 7.4 (c) Within 90 days of issuing an exemption under paragraph (b), the commissioner must |
|---|
| 196 | | - | 7.5submit a notice of the exemption to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative |
|---|
| 197 | | - | 7.6committees with jurisdiction over transportation finance and policy. At a minimum, the |
|---|
| 198 | | - | 7.7notice must identify the project and the reasons for the exemption. |
|---|
| 199 | | - | 7.8 Subd. 8.Transportation impact assessment and mitigation account.(a) A |
|---|
| 200 | | - | 7.9transportation impact assessment and mitigation account is established in the special revenue |
|---|
| 201 | | - | 7.10fund. The account consists of funds provided by law and any other money donated, allotted, |
|---|
| 202 | | - | 7.11transferred, or otherwise provided to the account. |
|---|
| 203 | | - | 7.12 (b) Money in the account is annually appropriated to the commissioner and must only |
|---|
| 204 | | - | 7.13be expended on activities described or required under this section. In determining |
|---|
| 205 | | - | 7.14expenditures from the account, the commissioner must include prioritization for offset |
|---|
| 206 | | - | 7.15actions interlinked to trunk highway projects that reduce traffic fatalities or severe injuries. |
|---|
| 207 | | - | 7.16 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment. |
|---|
| 208 | | - | 7.17 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 174.01, subdivision 2, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 209 | | - | 7.18 Subd. 2.Transportation goals.The goals of the state transportation system are as |
|---|
| 210 | | - | 7.19follows: |
|---|
| 211 | | - | 7.20 (1) to minimize fatalities and injuries for transportation users throughout the state; |
|---|
| 212 | | - | 7.21 (2) to provide multimodal and intermodal transportation facilities and services to increase |
|---|
| 213 | | - | 7.22access for all persons and businesses and to ensure economic well-being and quality of life |
|---|
| 214 | | - | 7.23without undue burden placed on any community; |
|---|
| 215 | | - | 7.24 (3) to provide a reasonable travel time for commuters; |
|---|
| 216 | | - | 7.25 (4) to enhance economic development and provide for the economical, efficient, and |
|---|
| 217 | | - | 7.26safe movement of goods to and from markets by rail, highway, and waterway; |
|---|
| 218 | | - | 7.27 (5) to encourage tourism by providing appropriate transportation to Minnesota facilities |
|---|
| 219 | | - | 7.28designed to attract tourists and to enhance the appeal, through transportation investments, |
|---|
| 220 | | - | 7.29of tourist destinations across the state; |
|---|
| 221 | | - | 7.30 (6) to provide transit services to all counties in the state to meet the needs of transit users; |
|---|
| 222 | | - | 7Sec. 2. |
|---|
| 223 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT 8.1 (7) to promote accountability through systematic management of system performance |
|---|
| 224 | | - | 8.2and productivity through the utilization of technological advancements; |
|---|
| 225 | | - | 8.3 (8) to maximize the long-term benefits received for each state transportation investment; |
|---|
| 226 | | - | 8.4 (9) to provide for and prioritize funding of transportation investments that ensures that |
|---|
| 227 | | - | 8.5the state's transportation infrastructure is maintained in a state of good repair; |
|---|
| 228 | | - | 8.6 (10) to ensure that the planning and implementation of all modes of transportation are |
|---|
| 229 | | - | 8.7consistent with the environmental and energy goals of the state; |
|---|
| 230 | | - | 8.8 (11) to promote and increase the use of high-occupancy vehicles and low-emission |
|---|
| 231 | | - | 8.9vehicles; |
|---|
| 232 | | - | 8.10 (12) to provide an air transportation system sufficient to encourage economic growth |
|---|
| 233 | | - | 8.11and allow all regions of the state the ability to participate in the global economy; |
|---|
| 234 | | - | 8.12 (13) to increase use of transit as a percentage of all trips statewide by giving highest |
|---|
| 235 | | - | 8.13priority to the transportation modes with the greatest people-moving capacity and lowest |
|---|
| 236 | | - | 8.14long-term economic and environmental cost; |
|---|
| 237 | | - | 8.15 (14) to promote and increase bicycling and walking as a percentage of all trips as |
|---|
| 238 | | - | 8.16energy-efficient, nonpolluting, and healthy forms of transportation; |
|---|
| 239 | | - | 8.17 (15) secondary to the goal under clause (1), to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from |
|---|
| 240 | | - | 8.18the state's transportation sector; and |
|---|
| 241 | | - | 8.19 (16) secondary to the goal under clause (1), to accomplish these goals with minimal |
|---|
| 242 | | - | 8.20impact on the environment. |
|---|
| 243 | | - | 8.21 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment. |
|---|
| 244 | | - | 8.22 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 174.01, subdivision 3, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 245 | | - | 8.23 Subd. 3.Greenhouse gas emissions targets.(a) In association with the goals under |
|---|
| 246 | | - | 8.24subdivision 2, clauses (10) and (13) to (16), and subject to the transportation system safety |
|---|
| 247 | | - | 8.25goal under subdivision 2, clause (1), the commissioner of transportation must establish |
|---|
| 248 | | - | 8.26targets for the statewide greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal under section 216H.02, |
|---|
| 249 | | - | 8.27subdivision 1. |
|---|
| 250 | | - | 8.28 (b) The targets must include: |
|---|
| 251 | | - | 8.29 (1) establishment of proportional emissions reduction performance targets for the |
|---|
| 252 | | - | 8.30transportation sector; |
|---|
| 253 | | - | 8.31 (2) specification of the performance targets on a five-year or more frequent basis; and |
|---|
| 254 | | - | 8Sec. 3. |
|---|
| 255 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT 9.1 (3) allocation across the transportation sector, which: |
|---|
| 256 | | - | 9.2 (i) must provide for an allocation to the metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, |
|---|
| 257 | | - | 9.3subdivision 2; |
|---|
| 258 | | - | 9.4 (ii) must account for differences in the feasibility and extent of emissions reductions |
|---|
| 259 | | - | 9.5across forms of land use and across regions of the state; and |
|---|
| 260 | | - | 9.6 (iii) may include performance targets based on Department of Transportation district, |
|---|
| 261 | | - | 9.7geographic region, a per capita calculation, or transportation mode, or a combination. |
|---|
| 262 | | - | 9.8 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment. |
|---|
| 263 | | - | 9.9 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 174.03, subdivision 1a, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 264 | | - | 9.10 Subd. 1a.Revision of statewide multimodal transportation plan.(a) The commissioner |
|---|
| 265 | | - | 9.11must revise the statewide multimodal transportation plan by January 15, 2022, and by |
|---|
| 266 | | - | 9.12January 15 of every five years thereafter. Before final adoption of a revised plan, the |
|---|
| 267 | | - | 9.13commissioner must hold a hearing to receive public comment on the preliminary draft of |
|---|
| 268 | | - | 9.14the revised plan. |
|---|
| 269 | | - | 9.15 (b) Each revised statewide multimodal transportation plan must: |
|---|
| 270 | | - | 9.16 (1) incorporate the goals of the state transportation system in section 174.01; |
|---|
| 271 | | - | 9.17 (2) establish objectives, policies, and strategies for achieving those goals; and |
|---|
| 272 | | - | 9.18 (3) identify performance targets for measuring progress and achievement of transportation |
|---|
| 273 | | - | 9.19system goals, objectives, or policies. |
|---|
| 274 | | - | 9.20 (c) Any vehicle miles traveled reduction targets established in the plan are secondary to |
|---|
| 275 | | - | 9.21the transportation system safety and economic well-being goals under section 174.01, |
|---|
| 276 | | - | 9.22subdivision 2, clauses (1) and (2). |
|---|
| 277 | | - | 9.23 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment and |
|---|
| 278 | | - | 9.24applies to plans adopted on or after that date. |
|---|
| 279 | | - | 9Sec. 4. |
|---|
| 280 | | - | REVISOR KRB H0748-1HF748 FIRST ENGROSSMENT |
|---|
| 32 | + | Authored by Koznick02/13/2025 |
|---|
| 33 | + | The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation Finance and Policy 2.1 (3) halt project development and disallow inclusion of the project or portfolio in the |
|---|
| 34 | + | 2.2appropriate transportation improvement program. |
|---|
| 35 | + | 2.3 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment and |
|---|
| 36 | + | 2.4applies to plans or projects assessed on or after that date. |
|---|
| 37 | + | 2.5 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 161.178, subdivision 2a, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 38 | + | 2.6 Subd. 2a.Applicable projects.(a) For purposes of this section: |
|---|
| 39 | + | 2.7 (1) prior to the date established under paragraph (b) (c), a project or portfolio is a capacity |
|---|
| 40 | + | 2.8expansion project; and |
|---|
| 41 | + | 2.9 (2) on and after the date established under paragraph (b) (c), a project or portfolio is a |
|---|
| 42 | + | 2.10capacity expansion project or a collection of trunk highway and multimodal projects for a |
|---|
| 43 | + | 2.11fiscal year and specific region. |
|---|
| 44 | + | 2.12 (b) A project or portfolio does not include a project that is identified as included in the |
|---|
| 45 | + | 2.13transportation safety investment category established in the Minnesota state highway |
|---|
| 46 | + | 2.14investment plan under section 174.03, subdivision 1c. |
|---|
| 47 | + | 2.15 (c) The commissioner must establish a date to implement impact assessments on the |
|---|
| 48 | + | 2.16basis of assessing a portfolio or program of projects instead of on a project-by-project basis. |
|---|
| 49 | + | 2.17The date must be: |
|---|
| 50 | + | 2.18 (1) August 1, 2027, which applies to projects that first enter the appropriate transportation |
|---|
| 51 | + | 2.19improvement program for fiscal year 2031 or a subsequent year; or |
|---|
| 52 | + | 2.20 (2) as established by the commissioner, if the commissioner: |
|---|
| 53 | + | 2.21 (i) consults with metropolitan planning organizations; |
|---|
| 54 | + | 2.22 (ii) prioritizes and makes reasonable efforts to meet the date under clause (1) or an earlier |
|---|
| 55 | + | 2.23date; |
|---|
| 56 | + | 2.24 (iii) determines that the date established under this clause is the earliest practicable in |
|---|
| 57 | + | 2.25which the necessary models and tools are sufficient for analysis under this section; and |
|---|
| 58 | + | 2.26 (iv) submits a notice to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative |
|---|
| 59 | + | 2.27committees and divisions with jurisdiction over transportation policy and finance, which |
|---|
| 60 | + | 2.28must identify the date established and summarize the efforts under item (ii) and the |
|---|
| 61 | + | 2.29determination under item (iii). |
|---|
| 62 | + | 2.30 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment and |
|---|
| 63 | + | 2.31applies to plans or projects assessed on or after that date. |
|---|
| 64 | + | 2Sec. 2. |
|---|
| 65 | + | REVISOR KRB/KR 25-0336802/06/25 3.1 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 161.178, subdivision 4, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 66 | + | 3.2 Subd. 4.Impact mitigation; interlinking.(a) To provide for impact mitigation, the |
|---|
| 67 | + | 3.3applicable entity must interlink the project or portfolio as provided in this subdivision. |
|---|
| 68 | + | 3.4 (b) Impact mitigation is sufficient under subdivision 2, paragraph (b), if the project or |
|---|
| 69 | + | 3.5portfolio is interlinked to offset actions such that the total greenhouse gas emissions reduction |
|---|
| 70 | + | 3.6from the offset actions, after accounting for the greenhouse gas emissions otherwise resulting |
|---|
| 71 | + | 3.7from the project or portfolio, is consistent with meeting the targets specified under subdivision |
|---|
| 72 | + | 3.82, paragraph (a). Each comparison under this paragraph must be performed over equal |
|---|
| 73 | + | 3.9comparison periods. |
|---|
| 74 | + | 3.10 (c) An offset action consists of a project, program, operations modification, or mitigation |
|---|
| 75 | + | 3.11plan in one or more of the following areas: |
|---|
| 76 | + | 3.12 (1) transit expansion, including but not limited to regular route bus, arterial bus rapid |
|---|
| 77 | + | 3.13transit, highway bus rapid transit, rail transit, and intercity passenger rail; |
|---|
| 78 | + | 3.14 (2) transit service improvements, including but not limited to increased service level, |
|---|
| 79 | + | 3.15transit fare reduction, and transit priority treatments; |
|---|
| 80 | + | 3.16 (3) active transportation infrastructure; |
|---|
| 81 | + | 3.17 (4) micromobility infrastructure and service, including but not limited to shared vehicle |
|---|
| 82 | + | 3.18services; |
|---|
| 83 | + | 3.19 (5) transportation demand management, including but not limited to vanpool and shared |
|---|
| 84 | + | 3.20vehicle programs, remote work, and broadband access expansion; |
|---|
| 85 | + | 3.21 (6) parking management, including but not limited to parking requirements reduction |
|---|
| 86 | + | 3.22or elimination and parking cost adjustments; |
|---|
| 87 | + | 3.23 (7) land use, including but not limited to residential and other density increases, mixed-use |
|---|
| 88 | + | 3.24development, and transit-oriented development; |
|---|
| 89 | + | 3.25 (8) infrastructure improvements related to traffic operations, including but not limited |
|---|
| 90 | + | 3.26to roundabouts and reduced conflict intersections; |
|---|
| 91 | + | 3.27 (9) natural systems, including but not limited to prairie restoration, reforestation, and |
|---|
| 92 | + | 3.28urban green space; and |
|---|
| 93 | + | 3.29 (10) freight rail infrastructure and service improvements; and |
|---|
| 94 | + | 3.30 (11) as specified by the commissioner in the manner provided under paragraph (e). |
|---|
| 95 | + | 3.31 (d) An offset action may be identified as interlinked to the project or portfolio if: |
|---|
| 96 | + | 3Sec. 3. |
|---|
| 97 | + | REVISOR KRB/KR 25-0336802/06/25 4.1 (1) there is a specified project, program, modification, or mitigation plan; |
|---|
| 98 | + | 4.2 (2) the necessary funding sources are identified and sufficient amounts are committed; |
|---|
| 99 | + | 4.3 (3) the mitigation is localized as provided in subdivision 5; and |
|---|
| 100 | + | 4.4 (4) procedures are established to ensure that the mitigation action remains in substantially |
|---|
| 101 | + | 4.5the same form or a revised form that continues to meet the calculation under paragraph (b). |
|---|
| 102 | + | 4.6 (e) The commissioner may authorize additional offset actions under paragraph (c) if: |
|---|
| 103 | + | 4.7 (1) the offset action is reviewed and recommended by the technical advisory committee |
|---|
| 104 | + | 4.8under section 161.1782; and |
|---|
| 105 | + | 4.9 (2) the commissioner determines that the offset action is directly related to reduction in |
|---|
| 106 | + | 4.10the transportation sector of greenhouse gas emissions or vehicle miles traveled. |
|---|
| 107 | + | 4.11 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment and |
|---|
| 108 | + | 4.12applies to plans or projects assessed on or after that date. |
|---|
| 109 | + | 4.13 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 174.01, subdivision 2, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 110 | + | 4.14 Subd. 2.Transportation goals.The goals of the state transportation system are as |
|---|
| 111 | + | 4.15follows: |
|---|
| 112 | + | 4.16 (1) to minimize fatalities and injuries for transportation users throughout the state; |
|---|
| 113 | + | 4.17 (2) to provide multimodal and intermodal transportation facilities and services to increase |
|---|
| 114 | + | 4.18access for all persons and businesses and to ensure economic well-being and quality of life |
|---|
| 115 | + | 4.19without undue burden placed on any community; |
|---|
| 116 | + | 4.20 (3) to provide a reasonable travel time for commuters; |
|---|
| 117 | + | 4.21 (4) to enhance economic development and provide for the economical, efficient, and |
|---|
| 118 | + | 4.22safe movement of goods to and from markets by rail, highway, and waterway; |
|---|
| 119 | + | 4.23 (5) to encourage tourism by providing appropriate transportation to Minnesota facilities |
|---|
| 120 | + | 4.24designed to attract tourists and to enhance the appeal, through transportation investments, |
|---|
| 121 | + | 4.25of tourist destinations across the state; |
|---|
| 122 | + | 4.26 (6) to provide transit services to all counties in the state to meet the needs of transit users; |
|---|
| 123 | + | 4.27 (7) to promote accountability through systematic management of system performance |
|---|
| 124 | + | 4.28and productivity through the utilization of technological advancements; |
|---|
| 125 | + | 4.29 (8) to maximize the long-term benefits received for each state transportation investment; |
|---|
| 126 | + | 4Sec. 4. |
|---|
| 127 | + | REVISOR KRB/KR 25-0336802/06/25 5.1 (9) to provide for and prioritize funding of transportation investments that ensures that |
|---|
| 128 | + | 5.2the state's transportation infrastructure is maintained in a state of good repair; |
|---|
| 129 | + | 5.3 (10) to ensure that the planning and implementation of all modes of transportation are |
|---|
| 130 | + | 5.4consistent with the environmental and energy goals of the state; |
|---|
| 131 | + | 5.5 (11) to promote and increase the use of high-occupancy vehicles and low-emission |
|---|
| 132 | + | 5.6vehicles; |
|---|
| 133 | + | 5.7 (12) to provide an air transportation system sufficient to encourage economic growth |
|---|
| 134 | + | 5.8and allow all regions of the state the ability to participate in the global economy; |
|---|
| 135 | + | 5.9 (13) to increase use of transit as a percentage of all trips statewide by giving highest |
|---|
| 136 | + | 5.10priority to the transportation modes with the greatest people-moving capacity and lowest |
|---|
| 137 | + | 5.11long-term economic and environmental cost; |
|---|
| 138 | + | 5.12 (14) to promote and increase bicycling and walking as a percentage of all trips as |
|---|
| 139 | + | 5.13energy-efficient, nonpolluting, and healthy forms of transportation; |
|---|
| 140 | + | 5.14 (15) secondary to the goal under clause (1), to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from |
|---|
| 141 | + | 5.15the state's transportation sector; and |
|---|
| 142 | + | 5.16 (16) secondary to the goal under clause (1), to accomplish these goals with minimal |
|---|
| 143 | + | 5.17impact on the environment. |
|---|
| 144 | + | 5.18 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment. |
|---|
| 145 | + | 5.19 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 174.01, subdivision 3, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 146 | + | 5.20 Subd. 3.Greenhouse gas emissions targets.(a) In association with the goals under |
|---|
| 147 | + | 5.21subdivision 2, clauses (10) and (13) to (16), and subject to the transportation system safety |
|---|
| 148 | + | 5.22goal under subdivision 2, clause (1), the commissioner of transportation must establish |
|---|
| 149 | + | 5.23targets for the statewide greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal under section 216H.02, |
|---|
| 150 | + | 5.24subdivision 1. |
|---|
| 151 | + | 5.25 (b) The targets must include: |
|---|
| 152 | + | 5.26 (1) establishment of proportional emissions reduction performance targets for the |
|---|
| 153 | + | 5.27transportation sector; |
|---|
| 154 | + | 5.28 (2) specification of the performance targets on a five-year or more frequent basis; and |
|---|
| 155 | + | 5.29 (3) allocation across the transportation sector, which: |
|---|
| 156 | + | 5.30 (i) must provide for an allocation to the metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, |
|---|
| 157 | + | 5.31subdivision 2; |
|---|
| 158 | + | 5Sec. 5. |
|---|
| 159 | + | REVISOR KRB/KR 25-0336802/06/25 6.1 (ii) must account for differences in the feasibility and extent of emissions reductions |
|---|
| 160 | + | 6.2across forms of land use and across regions of the state; and |
|---|
| 161 | + | 6.3 (iii) may include performance targets based on Department of Transportation district, |
|---|
| 162 | + | 6.4geographic region, a per capita calculation, or transportation mode, or a combination. |
|---|
| 163 | + | 6.5 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment. |
|---|
| 164 | + | 6.6 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 174.03, subdivision 1a, is amended to read: |
|---|
| 165 | + | 6.7 Subd. 1a.Revision of statewide multimodal transportation plan.(a) The commissioner |
|---|
| 166 | + | 6.8must revise the statewide multimodal transportation plan by January 15, 2022, and by |
|---|
| 167 | + | 6.9January 15 of every five years thereafter. Before final adoption of a revised plan, the |
|---|
| 168 | + | 6.10commissioner must hold a hearing to receive public comment on the preliminary draft of |
|---|
| 169 | + | 6.11the revised plan. |
|---|
| 170 | + | 6.12 (b) Each revised statewide multimodal transportation plan must: |
|---|
| 171 | + | 6.13 (1) incorporate the goals of the state transportation system in section 174.01; |
|---|
| 172 | + | 6.14 (2) establish objectives, policies, and strategies for achieving those goals; and |
|---|
| 173 | + | 6.15 (3) identify performance targets for measuring progress and achievement of transportation |
|---|
| 174 | + | 6.16system goals, objectives, or policies. |
|---|
| 175 | + | 6.17 (c) Any vehicle miles traveled reduction targets established in the plan are secondary to |
|---|
| 176 | + | 6.18the transportation system safety goal under section 174.01, subdivision 2, clause (1). |
|---|
| 177 | + | 6.19 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment and |
|---|
| 178 | + | 6.20applies to plans adopted on or after that date. |
|---|
| 179 | + | 6Sec. 6. |
|---|
| 180 | + | REVISOR KRB/KR 25-0336802/06/25 |
|---|