Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF1067 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 02/04/2025

                            1.1	A bill for an act​
1.2 relating to public safety; providing for a process to review case files of cold case​
1.3 homicides at the request of certain family members and to potentially conduct​
1.4 reinvestigations of these cases; requiring a report; proposing coding for new law​
1.5 in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 299C.​
1.6BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:​
1.7 Section 1. [299C.85] COLD CASE HOMICIDES; REVIEWS; REINVESTIGATIONS.​
1.8 Subdivision 1.Definitions.As used in this section, the following terms have the meanings​
1.9given:​
1.10 (1) "agency" means a state or local law enforcement agency;​
1.11 (2) "authorized person" means an immediate family member of a victim, including a​
1.12parent, parent-in-law, grandparent, grandparent-in-law, sibling, spouse, child, or stepchild;​
1.13 (3) "cold case homicide" means a homicide:​
1.14 (i) committed more than three years prior to the date of an application for a case file​
1.15review;​
1.16 (ii) previously investigated by a state, local, or federal law enforcement agency;​
1.17 (iii) for which all probative investigative leads have been exhausted; and​
1.18 (iv) for which no likely perpetrator has been identified; and​
1.19 (4) "victim" means a natural person who died as a result of a cold case homicide.​
1.20 Subd. 2.Initial review.(a) The head of an agency shall review the case file regarding​
1.21a cold case homicide within the agency's jurisdiction upon the receipt of a written application​
1​Section 1.​
25-02684 as introduced​01/24/25 REVISOR KLL/ES​
SENATE​
STATE OF MINNESOTA​
S.F. No. 1067​NINETY-FOURTH SESSION​
(SENATE AUTHORS: CARLSON)​
OFFICIAL STATUS​D-PG​DATE​
Introduction and first reading​02/06/2025​
Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety​ 2.1submitted by an authorized person to determine if a full reinvestigation of the case would​
2.2result in either the identification of probative investigative leads or a likely perpetrator. The​
2.3review must include:​
2.4 (1) an analysis of what investigative steps or follow-up steps may have been missed in​
2.5the initial investigation;​
2.6 (2) an assessment of whether witnesses should be interviewed or reinterviewed;​
2.7 (3) an examination of physical evidence to see if all appropriate forensic testing and​
2.8analysis was performed in the first instance or if additional testing might produce information​
2.9relevant to the investigation; and​
2.10 (4) an update of the case file using the most current investigative standards as of the​
2.11date of the review to the extent it would help develop probative leads.​
2.12 (b) If the head of the agency determines that the case does not satisfy the criteria to be​
2.13considered a cold case homicide, a review under paragraph (a) is not required and the head​
2.14shall issue a written certification to the authorized person stating that a review is not necessary​
2.15because all probative investigative leads have been exhausted or that a likely perpetrator​
2.16will not be identified.​
2.17 (c) A review under paragraph (a) may not be conducted by a person who previously​
2.18investigated the homicide at issue.​
2.19 (d) The agency shall provide in writing to the authorized person as soon as reasonably​
2.20possible:​
2.21 (1) confirmation of the agency's receipt of the application under paragraph (a); and​
2.22 (2) notice of the authorized person's rights under this section.​
2.23 (e) Only one case file review shall be undertaken at any one time with respect to the​
2.24same cold case homicide victim.​
2.25 (f) The agency shall conclude its case file review and reach a conclusion about whether​
2.26or not a full reinvestigation under subdivision 4 is warranted within six months of receiving​
2.27the application for review.​
2.28 (g) The agency may extend the time limit under paragraph (f) once for a period of time​
2.29not to exceed six months if the agency makes a finding that the number of case files to be​
2.30reviewed make it impracticable to comply with the limit without unreasonably taking​
2.31resources from other law enforcement activities. For cases for which the time limit in​
2​Section 1.​
25-02684 as introduced​01/24/25 REVISOR KLL/ES​ 3.1paragraph (f) is extended, the agency shall provide notice and an explanation of its reasoning​
3.2to the authorized person who filed the written application for review.​
3.3 Subd. 3.Application.Each agency shall develop a written application to be used for​
3.4authorized persons to request a case file review under subdivision 2.​
3.5 Subd. 4.Full reinvestigation.(a) The agency shall conduct a full reinvestigation of the​
3.6cold case homicide at issue if the review of the case file required by subdivision 2 concludes​
3.7that a full reinvestigation of the cold case homicide would result in probative investigative​
3.8leads.​
3.9 (b) A full reinvestigation must include analyzing all evidence regarding the cold case​
3.10homicide at issue for the purpose of developing probative investigative leads or a likely​
3.11perpetrator.​
3.12 (c) A reinvestigation required under paragraph (a) may not be conducted by a person​
3.13who previously investigated the homicide at issue.​
3.14 (d) Only one full reinvestigation may be undertaken at any one time with respect to the​
3.15same cold case homicide victim.​
3.16 Subd. 5.Consultation and updates.(a) An agency conducting a case file review or full​
3.17reinvestigation under this section shall consult with the authorized person who filed the​
3.18written application for review and provide the person with periodic updates during the case​
3.19file review and full reinvestigation.​
3.20 (b) The agency shall meet with the authorized person and discuss the evidence to explain​
3.21to the person its decision whether or not to engage in the full reinvestigation provided for​
3.22under subdivision 4 at the conclusion of the case file review.​
3.23 Subd. 6.Subsequent reviews.(a) If a case file review is conducted and a conclusion is​
3.24reached not to conduct a full reinvestigation, no additional case file review is required to​
3.25be undertaken with respect to that case for a period of five years, unless there is newly​
3.26discovered, materially significant evidence. An agency may continue an investigation absent​
3.27an authorized person's application.​
3.28 (b) If a full reinvestigation of a cold case homicide is completed, and a suspect is not​
3.29identified at its conclusion, no additional case file review or full reinvestigation need be​
3.30undertaken with regard to that case for a period of five years beginning on the date of the​
3.31conclusion of the reinvestigation, unless there is newly discovered, materially significant​
3.32evidence.​
3​Section 1.​
25-02684 as introduced​01/24/25 REVISOR KLL/ES​ 4.1 Subd. 7.Withholding information.Nothing in this section requires an agency to provide​
4.2information to an authorized person that would endanger the safety of any person,​
4.3unreasonably impede an ongoing investigation, violate a court order, or violate legal​
4.4obligations regarding privacy.​
4.5 Subd. 8.Multiple agencies.In a case where more than one agency conducted the initial​
4.6investigation of a cold case homicide, each agency shall coordinate their case file review​
4.7or full reinvestigation so that there is only one joint case file review or full reinvestigation​
4.8occurring at a time.​
4.9 Subd. 9.Applicability.This section applies to cold case homicides occurring on or after​
4.10January 1, 1970.​
4.11 Subd. 10.Annual report.(a) By January 30 of each year, each agency shall submit to​
4.12the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in a manner determined by the bureau a report​
4.13describing actions taken and results achieved under this section during the previous calendar​
4.14year. At a minimum, the report must include:​
4.15 (1) the number of written applications filed with the agency for case file reviews;​
4.16 (2) the number of extensions granted, and an explanation of the reasons for the extension;​
4.17 (3) the number of cases where the agency head determined a case file review was not​
4.18warranted;​
4.19 (4) the number of cases in which a case file review under subdivision 2 was conducted​
4.20but where a full reinvestigation was determined to be unnecessary;​
4.21 (5) the number of full reinvestigations initiated or closed; and​
4.22 (6) information on the results of any full investigations conducted.​
4.23 (b) By March 15 of each year, the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension​
4.24shall publish on the bureau's website and report to the chairs and ranking minority members​
4.25of the senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over criminal justice​
4.26policy a summary of the reports it received from agencies under paragraph (a).​
4​Section 1.​
25-02684 as introduced​01/24/25 REVISOR KLL/ES​